XCH vs ST vs VFS Stock Comparison

Xchg, Sensata Technologies Holding and VinFast Auto Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
XCH XCHG Ltd
$1.94 -42.1% 1M +10.9% 1Y
Market cap
$6.82M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
EV Charging Industrials
VFS VinFast Auto Ltd.
$3.05 -4.1% 1M -5.3% 1Y
Market cap
$7.36B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3,514.06T
Div. yield
–
Auto Manufacturers Consumer Discretionary
3 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Sensata Technologies Holding leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Sensata Technologies Holding 5, VinFast Auto 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionXCHSTVFSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.82M $6.14B $7.36B VFS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 68.3x 0.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 11.3x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +0.8% +4,424.0% VFS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 2.4% -69.2% ST
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 2.6% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.8x -0.5x VFS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +10.9% +27.6% -5.3% ST
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -5.8%/yr -20.8%/yr ST
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 329.5% 39.7% 41.4% ST
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 48/100 7/100 ST

Percentile Scorecard

XCHSTVFS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisXCHSTVFS
Valuation – 77 #47 of 203 10 #45 of 50
Growth – 31 #130 of 187 4 #46 of 48
Profitability – 47 #98 of 185 11 #41 of 46
Financial Health 29 #51 of 71 35 #142 of 219 4 #50 of 52
Shareholder Returns – 47 #81 of 153 –
Overall – 48 7
  • XCH ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • ST ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • VFS ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodXCHSTVFSSPY
1 month -42.1%-3.6%-4.1% -0.8%
3 months +273.1%-12.3%+3.4% +3.5%
6 months +92.5%-3.7%-27.6% +7.0%
Year to date +71.7%+22.2%-8.7% +12.2%
1 year +10.9%+27.6%-5.3% +13.0%
3 years —+18.6%-42.7% +86.3%
3 years, per year —+5.9%-16.9% +23.1%
5 years —-25.7%-68.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year —-5.8%-20.8% +11.0%
10 years —+9.0%— +258.0%
10 years, per year —+0.9%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureXCHSTVFSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 329.5%39.7%41.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 134.8%36.8%39.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.701.920.79 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.030.70-0.13 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.2%-72.8%-97.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -58.0%-24.0%-35.9% -1.8%
52-week high $4.62$53.55$4.76 $779.14
52-week low $0.23$28.53$2.81 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleXCHSTVFS
P/E now vs peer median —median 25.4x 65.8xmedian 26.0x 0.0xmedian 18.9x
P/S now vs peer median —median 2.1x 1.6xmedian 1.9x 0.0xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 17.5x 15.0xmedian 14.0x -0.5xmedian 8.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 27.3x 10.2xmedian 21.4x 0.0xmedian 9.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 1.7x 2.0xmedian 2.2x 0.0xmedian 0.9x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.77 -1.74median 1.26 —median 1.40

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsXCHSTVFS
Revenue – $3.78B $3,514.06T
Gross profit – $1.11B -$1,799.20T
Operating income – $284.24M -$3,021.72T
Net income – $89.91M -$3,525.77T
Free cash flow – $579.20M -$1,569.01T
R&D – $128.20M $376.86T
EPS (diluted) – $0.61 $-1,039,497.78
Cash & equivalents $11.41M $403.30M $281.02T
Total debt $29.61M $11.62B $7,424.18T
Shares (diluted) 3.50M 146.70M 2.34B
Enterprise value -$61.62M $3.74B -$1,239.61T

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricXCHSTVFS
P/E – 65.8x 0.0x
P/FCF – 10.2x 0.0x
P/Operating cash flow – 8.5x 0.0x
P/S – 1.6x 0.0x
P/B 1.3x 2.0x 0.0x
P/Tangible book 1.3x 2.3x 0.0x
EV/EBITDA – 15.0x -0.5x
EV/EBIT – 28.0x -0.1x
EV/Revenue – 2.1x 0.1x
EV/FCF – 13.7x -0.3x
EV/Operating cash flow – 11.5x -0.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -1.74 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricXCHSTVFS
Revenue growth (1Y) – 0.8% 4,424%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -2.7% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 2.5% -6,447%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -5.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 110.8% -4,777%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -24.9% –
Net income growth (1Y) – -19.3% -3,441%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -38.6% –
EPS growth (1Y) – -19.4% -2,344%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -37.8% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 23.5% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 9.3% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 34.0% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 16.0% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricXCHSTVFS
Gross margin – 29.5% -51.2%
EBITDA margin – 14.0% -24.7%
Operating margin – 7.5% -86.0%
Pretax margin – 4.6% -102.7%
Net margin – 2.4% -69.2%
FCF margin – 15.3% -44.6%
Operating cash flow margin – 18.4% -50.4%
Return on equity – 3.1% –
Return on assets – 1.3% -47.1%
Return on invested capital – 2.6% –
Return on capital employed – 4.8% -208.1%
Asset turnover – 0.6x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 7.7x 0.5x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.7% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricXCHSTVFS
Debt / assets 19.7% 36.9% 29.1%
Debt / equity 0.8x 0.8x -0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.8x -0.5x
Debt / FCF – 4.2x -0.6x
Liabilities / assets 74.7% 55.1% 256.0%
Equity / assets 25.3% 44.9% -156.0%
Interest coverage – 2.0x -5.7x
Current ratio 1.2x 2.3x 0.5x
Quick ratio 0.7x 1.4x 0.2x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.5x 0.1x
Altman Z-score – 2.41 -10.29

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricXCHSTVFS
Dividend yield – 1.2% –
Net buyback yield – 0.4% –
Shareholder yield – 1.6% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusXCHSTVFS
Forward P/E – 11.3xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-2.46FY2026 $3.60FY2026 $-1.86FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +5.3%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +19.7% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $34.13MFY2026 $3.79BFY2026 $5.02BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +36.0%FY2026 +2.3%FY2026 +39.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +27.9% +1.1% +20.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersXCHSTVFS
Held by institutions – 100.0% 0.2%
Institutions holding – 467 32
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.1% -8.3%
Institutions buying – 265 20
Institutions selling – 149 8
Buyers to sellers – 1.78 2.50

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

XCHSTVFS
XCH 1.00 0.04 0.04
ST 0.04 1.00 0.17
VFS 0.04 0.17 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, XCH, ST and VFS?

VinFast Auto (VFS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Xchg (XCH) $6.82M, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) $6.14B, VinFast Auto (VFS) $7.36B.

Which company is growing faster?

VinFast Auto (VFS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) +0.8%, VinFast Auto (VFS) +4,424.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) has the highest net margin (Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) 2.4%, VinFast Auto (VFS) -69.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) returned the most: Xchg (XCH) +10.9%, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) +27.6%, VinFast Auto (VFS) -5.3%. Over five years, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) compounded fastest (Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) -5.8%/yr, VinFast Auto (VFS) -20.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) has been the steadiest (Xchg (XCH) 329.5%, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) 39.7%, VinFast Auto (VFS) 41.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, XCH, ST and VFS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.