XCH vs ST vs HRNNF Stock Comparison

Xchg, Sensata Technologies Holding and Hydro One Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
XCH XCHG Ltd
$1.94 -42.1% 1M +10.9% 1Y
Market cap
$6.99M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
EV Charging Industrials
HRNNF Hydro One Ltd
$38.68 +7.8% 1M +3.0% 1Y
Market cap
$23.20B
P/E
22.7x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
3.52%
Regulated Electric Utilities Utilities
5 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Hydro One leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Hydro One 5, Sensata Technologies Holding 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionXCHSTHRNNFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.99M $6.14B $23.20B HRNNF
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 68.3x 22.7x HRNNF
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 11.3x 22.9x ST
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +0.8% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 2.4% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 2.6% 6.4% HRNNF
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.8x 5.7x ST
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 3.52% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +10.9% +27.6% +3.0% ST
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -5.8%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 329.5% 39.7% 17.6% HRNNF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 48/100 66/100 HRNNF

Percentile Scorecard

XCHSTHRNNF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisXCHSTHRNNF
Valuation – 77 #47 of 203 32 #46 of 67
Growth – 31 #130 of 187 70 #20 of 65
Profitability – 47 #98 of 185 91 #7 of 64
Financial Health 29 #51 of 71 35 #142 of 219 52 #31 of 64
Shareholder Returns – 47 #81 of 153 83 #12 of 67
Overall – 48 66
  • XCH ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • ST ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • HRNNF ranked among 67 companies in Regulated Utilities

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodXCHSTHRNNFSPY
1 month -42.1%-3.6%+7.8% -0.8%
3 months +273.1%-12.3%-9.2% +3.5%
6 months +92.5%-3.7%-9.2% +7.0%
Year to date +71.7%+22.2%-2.4% +12.2%
1 year +10.9%+27.6%+3.0% +13.0%
3 years —+18.6%— +86.3%
3 years, per year —+5.9%— +23.1%
5 years —-25.7%— +68.6%
5 years, per year —-5.8%— +11.0%
10 years —+9.0%— +258.0%
10 years, per year —+0.9%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureXCHSTHRNNFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 329.5%39.7%17.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 134.8%36.8%18.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.701.92-0.24 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.030.700.17 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.2%-72.8%-18.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -58.0%-24.0%-11.8% -1.8%
52-week high $4.62$53.55$43.85 $779.14
52-week low $0.23$28.53$35.56 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleXCHSTHRNNF
P/E now vs peer median —median 25.4x 65.8xmedian 26.0x 22.7xmedian 20.8x
P/S now vs peer median —median 2.1x 1.6xmedian 1.9x —median 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 17.5x 15.0xmedian 14.0x 15.3xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 27.3x 10.2xmedian 21.4x 12.1xmedian 36.7x
P/B now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 1.7x 2.0xmedian 2.2x 2.5xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.77 -1.74median 1.26 2.15median 2.23

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsXCHSTHRNNF
Revenue – $3.78B –
Gross profit – $1.11B –
Operating income – $284.24M –
Net income – $89.91M $1.03B
Free cash flow – $579.20M $1.92B
R&D – $128.20M –
EPS (diluted) – $0.61 $1.70
Cash & equivalents $11.41M $403.30M $452.53M
Total debt $29.61M $11.62B $54.53B
Shares (diluted) 3.50M 146.70M 600.71M
Enterprise value -$61.44M $3.74B $22.10B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricXCHSTHRNNF
P/E – 65.8x 22.7x
P/FCF – 10.2x 12.1x
P/Operating cash flow – 8.5x 12.1x
P/S – 1.6x –
P/B 1.3x 2.0x 2.5x
P/Tangible book 1.3x 2.3x 2.6x
EV/EBITDA – 15.0x 15.3x
EV/EBIT – 28.0x 21.8x
EV/Revenue – 2.1x –
EV/FCF – 13.7x 19.2x
EV/Operating cash flow – 11.5x 19.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -1.74 2.15

Growth

14 metrics
MetricXCHSTHRNNF
Revenue growth (1Y) – 0.8% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -2.7% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 2.5% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -5.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 110.8% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -24.9% –
Net income growth (1Y) – -19.3% 14.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -38.6% 9.9%
EPS growth (1Y) – -19.4% 13.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -37.8% 10.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 23.5% 9.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 9.3% 5.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 34.0% 9.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 16.0% 5.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricXCHSTHRNNF
Gross margin – 29.5% –
EBITDA margin – 14.0% –
Operating margin – 7.5% –
Pretax margin – 4.6% –
Net margin – 2.4% –
FCF margin – 15.3% –
Operating cash flow margin – 18.4% –
Return on equity – 3.1% 11.2%
Return on assets – 1.3% 3.6%
Return on invested capital – 2.6% 6.4%
Return on capital employed – 4.8% –
Asset turnover – 0.6x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 7.7x 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.7% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricXCHSTHRNNF
Debt / assets 19.7% 36.9% 48.8%
Debt / equity 0.8x 0.8x 1.5x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.8x 5.7x
Debt / FCF – 4.2x 7.3x
Liabilities / assets 74.7% 55.1% 68.1%
Equity / assets 25.3% 44.9% 31.9%
Interest coverage – 2.0x 3.3x
Current ratio 1.2x 2.3x –
Quick ratio 0.7x 1.4x –
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.5x –
Altman Z-score – 2.41 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricXCHSTHRNNF
Dividend yield – 1.2% 3.5%
Net buyback yield – 0.4% –
Shareholder yield – 1.6% 3.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusXCHSTHRNNF
Forward P/E – 11.3xFY2026 22.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-2.46FY2026 $3.60FY2026 $1.69FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +5.3%FY2026 +4.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +19.7% +3.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $34.13MFY2026 $3.79BFY2026 $7.16BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +36.0%FY2026 +2.3%FY2026 +8.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +27.9% +1.1% +2.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersXCHSTHRNNF
Held by institutions – 100.0% 0.0%
Institutions holding – 467 1
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.1% –
Institutions buying – 265 0
Institutions selling – 149 0
Buyers to sellers – 1.78 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

XCHSTHRNNF
XCH 1.00 0.04 -0.15
ST 0.04 1.00 -0.13
HRNNF -0.15 -0.13 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, XCH, ST and HRNNF?

Hydro One (HRNNF) is the largest by market capitalisation: Xchg (XCH) $6.99M, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) $6.14B, Hydro One (HRNNF) $23.20B.

Which stock is cheaper, XCH, ST and HRNNF?

Hydro One (HRNNF) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) 68.3x, Hydro One (HRNNF) 22.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) is cheapest (Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) 11.3x, Hydro One (HRNNF) 22.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) returned the most: Xchg (XCH) +10.9%, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) +27.6%, Hydro One (HRNNF) +3.0%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Xchg (XCH) 0.00%, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) 0.00%, Hydro One (HRNNF) 3.52%. Xchg (XCH) and Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Hydro One (HRNNF) has been the steadiest (Xchg (XCH) 329.5%, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) 39.7%, Hydro One (HRNNF) 17.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, XCH, ST and HRNNF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Hydro One (HRNNF) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.