XCH vs LI vs BEEM Stock Comparison

Xchg, Li Auto and Beam Global Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
XCH XCHG Ltd
$1.94 -42.1% 1M +10.9% 1Y
Market cap
$6.47M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
EV Charging Industrials
1 win
LI Li Auto Inc.
$11.35 -1.3% 1M -48.2% 1Y
Market cap
$11.26B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$15.07B
Div. yield
–
Auto Manufacturers Consumer Discretionary
5 wins
BEEM Beam Global
$0.91 -23.5% 1M -69.8% 1Y
Market cap
$19.55M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$26.53M
Div. yield
–
EV Charging Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Li Auto leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Li Auto 5, Beam Global 1, Xchg 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionXCHLIBEEMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.47M $11.26B $19.55M LI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — -15.2x -1.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -24.5% -20.5% BEEM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -4.9% -64.5% LI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -9.0% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 0.1x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +10.9% -48.2% -69.8% XCH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -19.1%/yr -49.5%/yr LI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 329.5% 38.5% 78.9% LI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 36/100 29/100 LI

Percentile Scorecard

XCHLIBEEM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisXCHLIBEEM
Valuation – 29 #36 of 50 25 #46 of 61
Growth – 0 #48 of 48 25 #44 of 58
Profitability – 29 #33 of 46 32 #38 of 55
Financial Health 29 #51 of 71 88 #7 of 52 39 #44 of 71
Shareholder Returns – – 25 #22 of 29
Overall – 36 29
  • XCH ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • LI ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • BEEM ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodXCHLIBEEMSPY
1 month -42.1%-1.3%-23.5% -0.8%
3 months +273.1%-10.1%-13.3% +3.5%
6 months +92.5%-36.8%-51.1% +7.0%
Year to date +71.7%-33.0%-39.3% +12.2%
1 year +10.9%-48.2%-69.8% +13.0%
3 years —-67.6%-83.5% +86.3%
3 years, per year —-31.3%-45.2% +23.1%
5 years —-65.3%-96.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year —-19.1%-49.5% +11.0%
10 years ——-89.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year ——-19.8% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureXCHLIBEEMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 329.5%38.5%78.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 134.8%38.8%78.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.700.642.60 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.03-1.25-0.88 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.2%-77.1%-97.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -58.0%-47.4%-68.5% -1.8%
52-week high $4.62$21.56$2.89 $779.14
52-week low $0.23$10.69$0.87 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleXCHLIBEEM
P/E now vs peer median —median 25.4x -15.4xmedian 18.9x -1.2xmedian 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median —median 2.1x 0.8xmedian 0.5x 0.8xmedian 2.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 17.5x —median 8.2x -1.4xmedian 17.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 27.3x -17.2xmedian 9.4x -1.6xmedian 27.3x
P/B now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 1.7x 1.2xmedian 0.9x 1.0xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.77 0.23median 1.40 0.03median 0.77

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsXCHLIBEEM
Revenue – $15.07B $26.53M
Gross profit – $2.04B $2.70M
Operating income – -$1.00B -$17.23M
Net income – -$877.96M -$17.11M
Free cash flow – -$670.38M -$12.98M
R&D – $1.65B –
EPS (diluted) – $-0.69 $-0.97
Cash & equivalents $11.41M $5.91B $1.03M
Total debt $29.61M $4.97B $165.00K
Shares (diluted) 3.50M 1.07B 17.69M
Enterprise value -$61.96M -$37.70B $12.20M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricXCHLIBEEM
P/E – -15.4x -1.2x
P/FCF – -17.2x -1.6x
P/Operating cash flow – -8.1x -1.5x
P/S – 0.8x 0.8x
P/B 1.3x 1.2x 1.0x
P/Tangible book 1.3x 1.2x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA – – -1.4x
EV/EBIT – 0.1x -1.1x
EV/Revenue – 0.0x 0.7x
EV/FCF – 0.1x -1.5x
EV/Operating cash flow – 0.0x -1.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.23 0.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricXCHLIBEEM
Revenue growth (1Y) – -24.5% -20.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 12.9% -16.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -50.5% -50.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -0.7% 92.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -187.2% 27.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -206.1% 7.8%
Net income growth (1Y) – -177.8% 25.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -74.8% -39.1%
EPS growth (1Y) – -163.7% 35.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -68.1% -35.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -167.4% -214.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -34.3% 5.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -122.6% -132.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -29.7% 8.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricXCHLIBEEM
Gross margin – 13.5% 10.2%
EBITDA margin – – -51.9%
Operating margin – -6.7% -64.9%
Pretax margin – -5.1% -64.9%
Net margin – -4.9% -64.5%
FCF margin – -4.4% -48.9%
Operating cash flow margin – -9.4% -49.8%
Return on equity – -8.9% -82.4%
Return on assets – -4.2% -44.1%
Return on invested capital – -9.0% –
Return on capital employed – -7.8% -64.0%
Asset turnover – 0.7x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.6x 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue – – 5.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricXCHLIBEEM
Debt / assets 19.7% 5.1% 0.4%
Debt / equity 0.8x 0.1x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 0.1x
Debt / FCF – -1.6x 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 74.7% 53.5% 46.9%
Equity / assets 25.3% 46.5% 53.1%
Interest coverage – -30.4x -861.4x
Current ratio 1.2x 1.8x 1.5x
Quick ratio 0.7x 1.6x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.4x 1.6x 0.1x
Altman Z-score – – -5.14

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricXCHLIBEEM
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – -15.0%
Shareholder yield – 0.0% -15.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusXCHLIBEEM
EPS, next fiscal year $-2.46FY2026 $-0.61FY2026 $-0.72FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -290.6%FY2026 –
Revenue, next fiscal year $34.13MFY2026 $15.79BFY2026 $27.60MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +36.0%FY2026 -1.7%FY2026 -2.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +27.9% +41.2% +23.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersXCHLIBEEM
Held by institutions – 4.1% 9.8%
Institutions holding – 160 50
Change in shares held, QoQ – +17.2% -14.9%
Institutions buying – 92 26
Institutions selling – 47 9
Buyers to sellers – 1.96 2.89

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

XCHLIBEEM
XCH 1.00 0.01 0.21
LI 0.01 1.00 0.19
BEEM 0.21 0.19 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, XCH, LI and BEEM?

Li Auto (LI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Xchg (XCH) $6.47M, Li Auto (LI) $11.26B, Beam Global (BEEM) $19.55M.

Which company is growing faster?

Beam Global (BEEM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Li Auto (LI) -24.5%, Beam Global (BEEM) -20.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Li Auto (LI) has the highest net margin (Li Auto (LI) -4.9%, Beam Global (BEEM) -64.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Xchg (XCH) returned the most: Xchg (XCH) +10.9%, Li Auto (LI) -48.2%, Beam Global (BEEM) -69.8%. Over five years, Li Auto (LI) compounded fastest (Li Auto (LI) -19.1%/yr, Beam Global (BEEM) -49.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Li Auto (LI) has been the steadiest (Xchg (XCH) 329.5%, Li Auto (LI) 38.5%, Beam Global (BEEM) 78.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, XCH, LI and BEEM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Li Auto (LI) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.