WW vs OSW vs DRVN Stock Comparison

Ww International, Onespaworld Holdings and Driven Brands Holdings Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
WW Ww International, Inc.
$13.70 -4.5% 1M -58.4% 1Y
Market cap
$142.61M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Personal Services Consumer Discretionary
OSW ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd
$24.95 +8.9% 1M +17.0% 1Y
Market cap
$2.81B
P/E
34.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.01B
Div. yield
–
Personal Services Consumer Discretionary
8 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Onespaworld Holdings leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Onespaworld Holdings 8, Driven Brands Holdings 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionWWOSWDRVNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $142.61M $2.81B $1.94B OSW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 34.8x 11.7x DRVN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 22.5x 10.1x DRVN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +9.8% +7.6% OSW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 8.0% 8.6% DRVN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 13.1% 10.8% OSW
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.4x 3.8x OSW
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -58.4% +17.0% -23.8% OSW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +18.2%/yr -17.6%/yr OSW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 94.9% 35.1% 55.7% OSW
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 49/100 49/100 OSW

Percentile Scorecard

WWOSWDRVN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisWWOSWDRVN
Valuation – 13 #29 of 33 59 #14 of 33
Growth – 69 #10 of 30 62 #12 of 30
Profitability – 43 #17 of 29 57 #13 of 29
Financial Health 40 #24 of 39 90 #5 of 39 16 #33 of 39
Shareholder Returns – 31 #10 of 14 –
Overall – 49 49
  • WW ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services
  • OSW ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services
  • DRVN ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodWWOSWDRVNSPY
1 month -4.5%+8.9%-5.7% -0.2%
3 months -0.4%-10.0%-22.4% +3.9%
6 months +39.8%+5.1%-7.6% +8.2%
Year to date -53.1%+20.3%-21.7% +12.9%
1 year -58.4%+17.0%-23.8% +12.3%
3 years —+141.1%+5.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year —+34.1%+1.8% +23.3%
5 years —+131.0%-62.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year —+18.2%-17.6% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureWWOSWDRVNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 94.9%35.1%55.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 98.6%35.3%63.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.590.930.41 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.620.48-0.43 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -79.7%-45.0%-70.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -60.8%-13.0%-32.1% -1.2%
52-week high $34.92$28.68$17.09 $779.14
52-week low $9.12$19.37$10.30 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleWWOSWDRVN
P/E now vs peer median —median 15.2x 31.5xmedian 15.2x 11.6xmedian 15.2x
P/S now vs peer median —median 1.3x 2.5xmedian 1.3x 1.0xmedian 1.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 9.8x 21.9xmedian 9.8x 8.7xmedian 9.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 14.5x 32.4xmedian 14.5x 14.3xmedian 14.5x
P/B now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 2.0x 4.3xmedian 2.0x 2.3xmedian 2.0x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.35 0.35median 0.35 1.47median 0.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsWWOSWDRVN
Revenue – $1.01B $1.93B
Gross profit – $169.55M –
Operating income – $90.05M $269.79M
Net income – $80.95M $165.27M
Free cash flow – $78.23M $133.78M
EPS (diluted) – $0.79 $1.00
Cash & equivalents $160.28M $40.36M $183.95M
Total debt $465.47M $81.60M $1.69B
Shares (diluted) 9.99M 102.48M 164.94M
Enterprise value -$564.74M $2.71B $1.41B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricWWOSWDRVN
P/E – 31.5x 11.6x
P/FCF – 32.4x 14.3x
P/Operating cash flow – 26.5x 6.1x
P/S – 2.5x 1.0x
P/B 0.4x 4.3x 2.3x
P/Tangible book -0.8x 31.9x 8.4x
EV/EBITDA – 21.9x 8.7x
EV/EBIT – 28.6x 12.7x
EV/Revenue – 2.5x 1.8x
EV/FCF – 32.9x 25.5x
EV/Operating cash flow – 26.9x 10.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.35 1.47

Growth

14 metrics
MetricWWOSWDRVN
Revenue growth (1Y) – 9.8% 7.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 12.2% -4.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 9.7% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 13.8% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 10.9% 62.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 25.9% -7.1%
Net income growth (1Y) – 13.8% 163.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 93.3% 7.4%
EPS growth (1Y) – 15.0% 163.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 91.0% 7.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 26.4% 6.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 25.9% 9.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 17.3% 276.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 22.2% 33.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricWWOSWDRVN
Gross margin – 16.8% –
EBITDA margin – 11.6% 20.4%
Operating margin – 8.9% 14.0%
Pretax margin – 8.4% 8.3%
Net margin – 8.0% 8.6%
FCF margin – 7.7% 6.9%
Operating cash flow margin – 9.5% 16.2%
Return on equity – 14.2% 20.6%
Return on assets – 11.2% 4.8%
Return on invested capital – 13.1% 10.8%
Return on capital employed – 13.6% 8.6%
Asset turnover – 1.4x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.2x 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.9% 1.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricWWOSWDRVN
Debt / assets 49.2% 11.2% 47.6%
Debt / equity 1.5x 0.1x 2.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.4x 3.8x
Debt / FCF – 1.0x 12.6x
Liabilities / assets 66.4% 20.2% 76.5%
Equity / assets 33.6% 79.8% 23.5%
Interest coverage – 16.8x 2.8x
Current ratio 1.7x 2.9x 1.5x
Quick ratio 1.4x 2.5x 0.9x
Cash ratio 1.3x 0.7x 0.5x
Altman Z-score – 11.86 0.94

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricWWOSWDRVN
Dividend yield – 0.8% –
Net buyback yield – 1.5% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 2.3% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusWWOSWDRVN
Forward P/E – 22.5xFY2026 10.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-3.38FY2026 $1.11FY2026 $1.15FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +12.1%FY2026 -5.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +10.8% +30.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $656.64MFY2026 $1.09BFY2026 $1.93BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -7.6%FY2026 +13.7%FY2026 +3.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -9.3% +7.9% +18.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersWWOSWDRVN
Held by institutions 77.9% 100.0% 43.3%
Institutions holding 78 258 193
Change in shares held, QoQ +8.1% -0.5% -8.5%
Institutions buying 35 144 111
Institutions selling 17 79 51
Buyers to sellers 2.06 1.82 2.18

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

WWOSWDRVN
WW 1.00 0.22 0.02
OSW 0.22 1.00 0.18
DRVN 0.02 0.18 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, WW, OSW and DRVN?

Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ww International (WW) $142.61M, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) $2.81B, Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) $1.94B.

Which stock is cheaper, WW, OSW and DRVN?

Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) 34.8x, Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) 11.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) is cheapest (Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) 22.5x, Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) 10.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) +9.8%, Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) +7.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) has the highest net margin (Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) 8.0%, Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) 8.6%). On return on invested capital, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) leads (Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) 13.1%, Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) 10.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) returned the most: Ww International (WW) -58.4%, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) +17.0%, Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) -23.8%. Over five years, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) compounded fastest (Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) +18.2%/yr, Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) -17.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) has been the steadiest (Ww International (WW) 94.9%, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) 35.1%, Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) 55.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, WW, OSW and DRVN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.