WULF vs GDS vs WYFI Stock Comparison

Terawulf, GDS Holdings and WhiteFiber Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
WULF Terawulf Inc.
$12.75 -15.5% 1M -12.1% 1Y
Market cap
$6.36B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$165.19M
Div. yield
–
Data Centers Technology
4 wins
GDS GDS Holdings Ltd
$23.16 -26.0% 1M -38.5% 1Y
Market cap
$4.78B
P/E
8.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.75B
Div. yield
–
Data Centers Technology
4 wins
WYFI WhiteFiber, Inc.
$11.23 -39.4% 1M -66.8% 1Y
Market cap
$436.19M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$91.24M
Div. yield
–
Data Centers Technology
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Terawulf leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Terawulf 4, GDS Holdings 4, WhiteFiber 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionWULFGDSWYFILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.36B $4.78B $436.19M WULF
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -3.2x 8.3x -47.8x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 44.5x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.1% +15.8% +57.0% WYFI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -1,179.9% 30.1% -9.9% GDS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -9.2% 1.0% — GDS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -8.4x 3.1x -0.7x WULF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -12.1% -38.5% -66.8% WULF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -13.7%/yr -17.2%/yr — WULF
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 91.3% 56.9% 120.5% GDS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 12/100 68/100 39/100 GDS

Percentile Scorecard

WULFGDSWYFI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisWULFGDSWYFI
Valuation 3 #37 of 38 92 #4 of 38 54 #18 of 38
Growth 6 #34 of 36 57 #16 of 36 9 #33 of 36
Profitability 6 #32 of 34 73 #10 of 34 36 #22 of 34
Financial Health 28 #27 of 37 50 #19 of 37 56 #17 of 37
Shareholder Returns 16 #17 of 20 – –
Overall 12 68 39
  • WULF ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing
  • GDS ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing
  • WYFI ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodWULFGDSWYFISPY
1 month -15.5%-26.0%-39.4% +0.7%
3 months -28.5%-27.6%-57.2% +3.7%
6 months -41.3%-45.2%-26.6% +7.1%
Year to date +11.0%-33.6%-28.9% +12.8%
1 year -12.1%-38.5%-66.8% +11.9%
3 years +1,038.4%+126.4%— +85.2%
3 years, per year +125.1%+31.3%— +22.8%
5 years -52.1%-61.0%— +67.6%
5 years, per year -13.7%-17.2%— +10.9%
10 years +20.1%—— +262.0%
10 years, per year +1.8%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureWULFGDSWYFISPY
Volatility, 1Y 91.3%56.9%120.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 89.5%58.1%117.8% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.732.014.48 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.13-0.68-0.55 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -98.7%-91.8%-78.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -56.0%-51.3%-74.9% -1.2%
52-week high $28.98$47.52$44.77 $779.14
52-week low $10.99$22.14$9.52 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleWULFGDSWYFI
P/E now vs peer median -3.2xmedian 27.6x 8.3xmedian 27.6x -47.8xmedian 27.6x
P/S now vs peer median 38.5xmedian 4.6x 2.7xmedian 4.6x 4.8xmedian 4.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -28.9xmedian 25.6x 11.3xmedian 25.6x -37.2xmedian 25.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median -2.3xmedian 15.4x 5.0xmedian 15.4x —median 15.4x
P/B now vs peer median 43.1xmedian 4.1x 1.1xmedian 4.1x 1.3xmedian 4.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.03median 0.80 0.13median 0.80 —median 0.80

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsWULFGDSWYFI
Revenue $165.19M $1.75B $91.24M
Gross profit $114.42M $436.56M –
Operating income -$413.59M $82.93M -$38.11M
Net income -$1.95B $542.46M -$41.09M
Free cash flow -$2.74B $952.99M –
R&D – $4.66M –
EPS (diluted) $-4.01 $2.57 $-0.23
Cash & equivalents $2.62B $2.20B $56.06M
Total debt $5.21B $15.20B $65.40M
Shares (diluted) 485.73M 205.57M 38.66M
Enterprise value -$2.87B -$3.36B $79.07M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricWULFGDSWYFI
P/E -3.2x 8.3x -47.8x
P/FCF -2.3x 5.0x –
P/Operating cash flow -22.8x 9.3x –
P/S 38.5x 2.7x 4.8x
P/B 43.1x 1.1x 1.3x
P/Tangible book 43.2x 1.1x 1.3x
EV/EBITDA -28.9x 11.3x -37.2x
EV/EBIT -21.7x 79.7x -11.7x
EV/Revenue 54.2x 3.8x 4.9x
EV/FCF -3.3x 6.9x –
EV/Operating cash flow -32.1x 12.9x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.03 0.13 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricWULFGDSWYFI
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.1% 15.8% 57.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 59.9% 8.1% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 47.3% 27.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 79.3% 14.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -190.5% -57.2% -302.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -114.6% -5.5% –
Net income growth (1Y) -942.8% -14.6% -395.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -166.8% 71.9% –
EPS growth (1Y) -728.9% -26.4% -349.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -101.1% 65.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -350.5% 15.3% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -141.4% 20.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -508.0% 3.3% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -276.0% -11.1% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricWULFGDSWYFI
Gross margin 69.3% 24.9% –
EBITDA margin -187.4% 33.5% -13.1%
Operating margin -250.4% 4.7% -41.8%
Pretax margin -1,164% 14.8% -47.7%
Net margin -1,180% 30.1% -9.9%
FCF margin -1,656% 54.3% –
Operating cash flow margin -169.0% 29.3% –
Return on equity -5,567% 12.5% -10.0%
Return on assets -25.8% 4.4% -5.4%
Return on invested capital -9.2% 1.0% –
Return on capital employed -11.0% 0.8% -6.0%
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.1x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.1x 0.9x –
Stock comp / revenue 118.8% 2.5% 22.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricWULFGDSWYFI
Debt / assets 64.8% 31.9% 7.3%
Debt / equity 35.3x 0.9x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA -8.4x 3.1x -0.7x
Debt / FCF -1.9x 4.2x –
Liabilities / assets 98.2% 64.8% 61.7%
Equity / assets 1.8% 35.2% 38.3%
Interest coverage -2.1x 0.4x –
Current ratio 0.7x 1.8x 0.8x
Quick ratio 0.7x 1.4x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.7x 1.1x 0.4x
Altman Z-score -0.22 0.63 0.32

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricWULFGDSWYFI
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -19.1% – –
Shareholder yield -19.1% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusWULFGDSWYFI
Forward P/E – 44.5xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-3.04FY2026 $0.52FY2026 $-1.03FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +550.0%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – -103.8% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $247.09MFY2026 $1.96BFY2026 $128.36MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +46.6%FY2026 +20.4%FY2026 +62.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +255.6% +1.6% +122.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersWULFGDSWYFI
Held by institutions 79.4% 50.9% 25.7%
Institutions holding 495 199 125
Change in shares held, QoQ +25.2% +15.4% +23.5%
Institutions buying 307 121 97
Institutions selling 137 61 22
Buyers to sellers 2.24 1.98 4.41

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

WULFGDSWYFI
WULF 1.00 0.42 0.65
GDS 0.42 1.00 0.41
WYFI 0.65 0.41 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, WULF, GDS and WYFI?

Terawulf (WULF) is the largest by market capitalisation: Terawulf (WULF) $6.36B, GDS Holdings (GDS) $4.78B, WhiteFiber (WYFI) $436.19M.

Which company is growing faster?

WhiteFiber (WYFI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Terawulf (WULF) +4.1%, GDS Holdings (GDS) +15.8%, WhiteFiber (WYFI) +57.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

GDS Holdings (GDS) has the highest net margin (Terawulf (WULF) -1,179.9%, GDS Holdings (GDS) 30.1%, WhiteFiber (WYFI) -9.9%). On return on invested capital, GDS Holdings (GDS) leads (Terawulf (WULF) -9.2%, GDS Holdings (GDS) 1.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Terawulf (WULF) returned the most: Terawulf (WULF) -12.1%, GDS Holdings (GDS) -38.5%, WhiteFiber (WYFI) -66.8%. Over five years, Terawulf (WULF) compounded fastest (Terawulf (WULF) -13.7%/yr, GDS Holdings (GDS) -17.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, GDS Holdings (GDS) has been the steadiest (Terawulf (WULF) 91.3%, GDS Holdings (GDS) 56.9%, WhiteFiber (WYFI) 120.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, WULF, GDS and WYFI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Terawulf (WULF) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.