WRD vs NBIS vs AMBA Stock Comparison

WeRide, Nebius and Ambarella Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
WRD WeRide Inc.
$4.18 -24.4% 1M -60.7% 1Y
Market cap
$1.31B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$92.10M
Div. yield
–
Autonomous Driving Technology
2 wins
NBIS Nebius Group N.V.
$153.27 -35.4% 1M +30.7% 1Y
Market cap
$40.35B
P/E
45.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.36B
Div. yield
–
Cloud Platforms Technology
5 wins
AMBA Ambarella Inc
$66.82 -8.1% 1M -22.0% 1Y
Market cap
$2.97B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$417.80M
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Design Technology

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Nebius leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Nebius 5, WeRide 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionWRDNBISAMBALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.31B $40.35B $2.97B NBIS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -5.9x 45.0x -52.7x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 86.8x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +244.8% +506.9% +20.0% NBIS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -243.6% 66.1% -13.5% NBIS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -24.9% -3.3% — NBIS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.0x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -60.7% +30.7% -22.0% NBIS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — -18.1%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 60.2% 107.0% 74.6% WRD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 70/100 66/100 40/100 WRD

Percentile Scorecard

WRDNBISAMBA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisWRDNBISAMBA
Valuation 58 #6 of 13 78 #9 of 38 31 #66 of 95
Growth 91 #2 of 12 34 #24 of 36 55 #42 of 93
Profitability 82 #3 of 12 76 #9 of 34 26 #68 of 91
Financial Health 50 #7 of 13 76 #10 of 38 59 #42 of 101
Shareholder Returns – – 31 #52 of 75
Overall 70 66 40
  • WRD ranked among 14 companies in Robotics and Automation
  • NBIS ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing
  • AMBA ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodWRDNBISAMBASPY
1 month -24.4%-35.4%-8.1% -0.8%
3 months -25.8%-18.4%-2.1% +3.5%
6 months -48.8%+5.7%+3.0% +7.0%
Year to date -51.8%+83.1%-5.7% +12.2%
1 year -60.7%+30.7%-22.0% +13.0%
3 years ——+42.8% +86.3%
3 years, per year ——+12.6% +23.1%
5 years ——-63.2% +68.6%
5 years, per year ——-18.1% +11.0%
10 years ——+6.9% +258.0%
10 years, per year ——+0.7% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureWRDNBISAMBASPY
Volatility, 1Y 60.2%107.0%74.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 63.5%98.4%79.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.253.782.61 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.010.29-0.29 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.9%-58.3%-81.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -64.3%-46.5%-30.0% -1.8%
52-week high $11.72$286.69$95.51 $779.14
52-week low $4.08$73.87$48.65 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleWRDNBISAMBA
P/E now vs peer median -5.8x 41.5xmedian 29.6x -52.2xmedian 42.1x
P/S now vs peer median 14.0xmedian 17.8x 28.6xmedian 4.2x 7.1xmedian 7.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median — 231.6xmedian 24.2x -72.0xmedian 27.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 14.0x 2.4xmedian 15.1x 303.4xmedian 37.2x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.0x 3.8xmedian 3.9x 4.8xmedian 4.2x
PEG now vs peer median — -0.59median 0.38 -2.66median 2.23

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsWRDNBISAMBA
Revenue $92.10M $1.36B $417.80M
Gross profit $39.20M $1.01B $244.50M
Operating income -$260.29M -$668.60M -$62.24M
Net income -$237.93M $61.60M -$56.32M
Free cash flow – $16.40B $9.72M
R&D $219.70M $356.40M $228.69M
EPS (diluted) – $3.17 $-1.28
Cash & equivalents $629.27M $8.04B $101.85M
Total debt $194.84M $25.23B –
Shares (diluted) – 282.72M 44.01M
Enterprise value -$1.73B $13.78B $1.81B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricWRDNBISAMBA
P/E -5.8x 41.5x -52.2x
P/FCF – 2.4x 303.4x
P/Operating cash flow – 7.4x 107.9x
P/S 14.0x 28.6x 7.1x
P/B 1.4x 3.8x 4.8x
P/Tangible book 1.4x 3.8x 5.2x
EV/EBITDA – 231.6x -72.0x
EV/EBIT -2.7x -58.8x -43.0x
EV/Revenue 7.5x 29.0x 6.4x
EV/FCF – 2.4x 275.4x
EV/Operating cash flow – 7.5x 98.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -0.59 -2.66

Growth

14 metrics
MetricWRDNBISAMBA
Revenue growth (1Y) 244.8% 506.9% 20.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -83.4% 12.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 142.5% 631.9% 17.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -81.7% 11.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) -22.9% -49.0% 36.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -26.7% 18.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 29.9% -73.4% 36.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -90.6% 16.9%
EPS growth (1Y) – 318.1% 38.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -70.8% 19.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 1,193% -47.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -55.8% 1.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 1,310% -73.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -47.1% -5.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricWRDNBISAMBA
Gross margin 42.6% 74.3% 58.5%
EBITDA margin – 12.5% -8.9%
Operating margin -282.6% -49.3% -14.9%
Pretax margin -258.0% 5.3% -12.9%
Net margin -243.6% 66.1% -13.5%
FCF margin – 1,210% 2.3%
Operating cash flow margin – 388.0% 6.5%
Return on equity -24.1% 0.7% -9.2%
Return on assets -20.5% 0.2% -7.2%
Return on invested capital -24.9% -3.3% –
Return on capital employed -26.6% -2.9% -9.6%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.1x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 85.4x -0.5x
Stock comp / revenue – 13.9% 21.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricWRDNBISAMBA
Debt / assets 6.3% 30.6% –
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.8x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.0x –
Debt / FCF – 0.5x –
Liabilities / assets 17.5% 63.0% 20.5%
Equity / assets 82.5% 37.0% 79.5%
Interest coverage – -2.8x –
Current ratio 5.4x 4.0x 2.8x
Quick ratio 4.0x 3.5x 2.2x
Cash ratio 3.7x 3.4x 2.0x
Altman Z-score 2.03 1.79 11.10

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricWRDNBISAMBA
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 7,333% -0.1%
Shareholder yield – 7,333% -0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusWRDNBISAMBA
Forward P/E – – 86.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.61FY2026 $-1.88FY2026 $0.77FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +24.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +40.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $149.54MFY2026 $3.25BFY2026 $454.23MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +52.8%FY2026 +512.5%FY2026 +16.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +89.2% +248.5% +3.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersWRDNBISAMBA
Held by institutions 26.0% 66.4% 81.7%
Institutions holding 110 1,052 337
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.2% +29.6% -1.5%
Institutions buying 51 694 203
Institutions selling 35 274 89
Buyers to sellers 1.46 2.53 2.28

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

WRDNBISAMBA
WRD 1.00 0.28 0.28
NBIS 0.28 1.00 0.32
AMBA 0.28 0.32 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, WRD, NBIS and AMBA?

Nebius (NBIS) is the largest by market capitalisation: WeRide (WRD) $1.31B, Nebius (NBIS) $40.35B, Ambarella (AMBA) $2.97B.

Which company is growing faster?

Nebius (NBIS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: WeRide (WRD) +244.8%, Nebius (NBIS) +506.9%, Ambarella (AMBA) +20.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Nebius (NBIS) has the highest net margin (WeRide (WRD) -243.6%, Nebius (NBIS) 66.1%, Ambarella (AMBA) -13.5%). On return on invested capital, Nebius (NBIS) leads (WeRide (WRD) -24.9%, Nebius (NBIS) -3.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Nebius (NBIS) returned the most: WeRide (WRD) -60.7%, Nebius (NBIS) +30.7%, Ambarella (AMBA) -22.0%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, WeRide (WRD) has been the steadiest (WeRide (WRD) 60.2%, Nebius (NBIS) 107.0%, Ambarella (AMBA) 74.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, WRD, NBIS and AMBA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Nebius (NBIS) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.