WRD vs MBLY vs QCOM Stock Comparison

WeRide, Mobileye Global and Qualcomm Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
WRD WeRide Inc.
$4.18 -24.4% 1M -60.7% 1Y
Market cap
$1.35B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$92.10M
Div. yield
–
Autonomous Driving Technology
2 wins
MBLY Mobileye Global Inc.
$6.66 -17.1% 1M -50.4% 1Y
Market cap
$5.62B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.02B
Div. yield
–
Autonomous Driving Technology
1 win
QCOM Qualcomm Inc/De
$179.60 -11.1% 1M +6.3% 1Y
Market cap
$194.85B
P/E
21.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$44.07B
Div. yield
0.02%
Semiconductor Design Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Qualcomm leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Qualcomm 5, WeRide 2, Mobileye Global 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionWRDMBLYQCOMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.35B $5.62B $194.85B QCOM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -6.0x -1.4x 21.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 14.2x 16.6x MBLY
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +244.8% +5.0% +1.9% WRD
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -243.6% -201.5% 21.0% QCOM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -24.9% — 20.5% QCOM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 0.4x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -60.7% -50.4% +6.3% QCOM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — +6.5%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 60.2% 56.0% 53.1% QCOM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 70/100 69/100 62/100 WRD

Percentile Scorecard

WRDMBLYQCOM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisWRDMBLYQCOM
Valuation 58 #6 of 13 92 #2 of 13 80 #20 of 95
Growth 91 #2 of 12 36 #8 of 12 34 #62 of 93
Profitability 82 #3 of 12 91 #2 of 12 87 #13 of 91
Financial Health 50 #7 of 13 58 #6 of 13 28 #73 of 101
Shareholder Returns – – 80 #16 of 75
Overall 70 69 62
  • WRD ranked among 14 companies in Robotics and Automation
  • MBLY ranked among 14 companies in Robotics and Automation
  • QCOM ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodWRDMBLYQCOMSPY
1 month -24.4%-17.1%-11.1% -0.8%
3 months -25.8%-16.9%+5.6% +3.5%
6 months -48.8%-26.1%+19.5% +7.0%
Year to date -51.8%-36.2%+5.0% +12.2%
1 year -60.7%-50.4%+6.3% +13.0%
3 years —-81.0%+68.7% +86.3%
3 years, per year —-42.5%+19.1% +23.1%
5 years ——+36.9% +68.6%
5 years, per year ——+6.5% +11.0%
10 years ——+163.3% +258.0%
10 years, per year ——+10.2% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureWRDMBLYQCOMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 60.2%56.0%53.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 63.5%56.6%52.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.252.142.07 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.01-0.900.12 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.9%-86.1%-45.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -64.3%-50.3%-28.5% -1.8%
52-week high $11.72$13.41$251.02 $779.14
52-week low $4.08$6.54$124.07 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleWRDMBLYQCOM
P/E now vs peer median -5.8x -1.3x 20.5xmedian 42.1x
P/S now vs peer median 14.0xmedian 17.8x 2.7xmedian 17.8x 4.3xmedian 7.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median — -1.1x 16.5xmedian 27.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 14.0x 14.0xmedian 14.0x 18.2xmedian 37.2x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.0x 0.7xmedian 1.0x 6.9xmedian 4.2x
PEG now vs peer median — 0.01 4.93median 2.23

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsWRDMBLYQCOM
Revenue $92.10M $2.02B $44.07B
Gross profit $39.20M $955.00M $23.90B
Operating income -$260.29M -$4.18B $10.22B
Net income -$237.93M -$4.06B $9.26B
Free cash flow – $388.00M $10.42B
R&D $219.70M $1.12B $9.89B
EPS (diluted) – $-4.97 $8.66
Cash & equivalents $629.27M $1.31B $4.53B
Total debt $194.84M – $12.78B
Shares (diluted) – 818.00M 1.07B
Enterprise value -$1.69B -$483.25M $154.77B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricWRDMBLYQCOM
P/E -5.8x -1.3x 20.5x
P/FCF – 14.0x 18.2x
P/Operating cash flow – 11.1x 15.3x
P/S 14.0x 2.7x 4.3x
P/B 1.4x 0.7x 6.9x
P/Tangible book 1.4x 0.8x 7.3x
EV/EBITDA – -1.1x 16.5x
EV/EBIT -2.7x -1.0x 19.0x
EV/Revenue 7.5x 2.1x 4.4x
EV/FCF – 10.7x 18.7x
EV/Operating cash flow – 8.4x 15.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.01 4.93

Growth

14 metrics
MetricWRDMBLYQCOM
Revenue growth (1Y) 244.8% 5.0% 1.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 1.5% 4.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 142.5% 1.9% -0.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 0.2% 3.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) -22.9% -35.4% -15.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -231.1% 0.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 29.9% -37.5% -20.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -221.7% 2.4%
EPS growth (1Y) – -36.5% -17.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -220.0% 4.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -24.8% -2.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -1.3% 12.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -34.1% -10.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -0.5% 14.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricWRDMBLYQCOM
Gross margin 42.6% 47.4% 54.2%
EBITDA margin – -180.9% 26.8%
Operating margin -282.6% -207.1% 23.2%
Pretax margin -258.0% -204.2% 25.4%
Net margin -243.6% -201.5% 21.0%
FCF margin – 19.2% 23.6%
Operating cash flow margin – 24.3% 28.1%
Return on equity -24.1% -49.6% 33.7%
Return on assets -20.5% -46.2% 16.2%
Return on invested capital -24.9% – 20.5%
Return on capital employed -26.6% -50.1% 22.3%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.2x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – -0.1x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 15.6% 7.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricWRDMBLYQCOM
Debt / assets 6.3% – 22.3%
Debt / equity 0.1x – 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 0.4x
Debt / FCF – – 1.2x
Liabilities / assets 17.5% 7.1% 51.8%
Equity / assets 82.5% 92.9% 48.2%
Interest coverage – – 14.8x
Current ratio 5.4x 4.6x 2.0x
Quick ratio 4.0x 3.4x 1.1x
Cash ratio 3.7x 2.9x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 2.03 2.94 6.10

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricWRDMBLYQCOM
Dividend yield – – 2.0%
Net buyback yield – – 4.6%
Shareholder yield – – 6.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 41.3%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 36.7%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 0.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 3.9%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusWRDMBLYQCOM
Forward P/E – 14.2xFY2026 16.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.62FY2026 $0.47FY2026 $10.79FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +30.6%FY2026 -10.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +2.1% -3.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $149.56MFY2026 $2.11BFY2026 $45.55BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +52.8%FY2026 +11.7%FY2026 +3.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +88.4% +7.9% -5.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersWRDMBLYQCOM
Held by institutions 26.0% 21.9% 79.7%
Institutions holding 110 294 3,029
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.2% +0.6% +2.8%
Institutions buying 51 169 1,416
Institutions selling 35 82 1,332
Buyers to sellers 1.46 2.06 1.06

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

WRDMBLYQCOM
WRD 1.00 0.25 0.26
MBLY 0.25 1.00 0.29
QCOM 0.26 0.29 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, WRD, MBLY and QCOM?

Qualcomm (QCOM) is the largest by market capitalisation: WeRide (WRD) $1.35B, Mobileye Global (MBLY) $5.62B, Qualcomm (QCOM) $194.85B.

Which company is growing faster?

WeRide (WRD) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: WeRide (WRD) +244.8%, Mobileye Global (MBLY) +5.0%, Qualcomm (QCOM) +1.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Qualcomm (QCOM) has the highest net margin (WeRide (WRD) -243.6%, Mobileye Global (MBLY) -201.5%, Qualcomm (QCOM) 21.0%). On return on invested capital, Qualcomm (QCOM) leads (WeRide (WRD) -24.9%, Qualcomm (QCOM) 20.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Qualcomm (QCOM) returned the most: WeRide (WRD) -60.7%, Mobileye Global (MBLY) -50.4%, Qualcomm (QCOM) +6.3%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: WeRide (WRD) 0.00%, Mobileye Global (MBLY) 0.00%, Qualcomm (QCOM) 0.02%. WeRide (WRD) and Mobileye Global (MBLY) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Qualcomm (QCOM) has been the steadiest (WeRide (WRD) 60.2%, Mobileye Global (MBLY) 56.0%, Qualcomm (QCOM) 53.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, WRD, MBLY and QCOM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Qualcomm (QCOM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.