WRD vs BIDU vs YMM Stock Comparison

WeRide, Baidu and Full Truck Alliance Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
WRD WeRide Inc.
$4.18 -24.4% 1M -60.7% 1Y
Market cap
$1.36B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$92.10M
Div. yield
–
Autonomous Driving Technology
1 win
BIDU Baidu, Inc.
$77.85 -10.9% 1M -36.6% 1Y
Market cap
$2.67B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$18.33B
Div. yield
–
AI Platforms Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Full Truck Alliance leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Full Truck Alliance 6, Baidu 2, WeRide 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionWRDBIDUYMMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.36B $2.67B $8.72B YMM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -6.1x -5.5x 14.3x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 14.4x 11.1x YMM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +244.8% -0.9% — WRD
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -243.6% -2.6% — BIDU
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -24.9% -2.0% — BIDU
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -60.7% -36.6% -36.0% YMM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -14.2%/yr -11.1%/yr YMM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 60.2% 47.1% 36.3% YMM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 70/100 55/100 74/100 YMM

Percentile Scorecard

WRDBIDUYMM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisWRDBIDUYMM
Valuation 58 #6 of 13 92 #11 of 124 84 #28 of 167
Growth 91 #2 of 12 19 #92 of 113 76 #38 of 153
Profitability 82 #3 of 12 54 #51 of 110 69 #48 of 153
Financial Health 50 #7 of 13 57 #56 of 129 94 #11 of 179
Shareholder Returns – – 50 #48 of 94
Overall 70 55 74
  • WRD ranked among 14 companies in Robotics and Automation
  • BIDU ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • YMM ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodWRDBIDUYMMSPY
1 month -24.4%-10.9%+2.8% -0.8%
3 months -25.8%-26.1%-10.1% +3.5%
6 months -48.8%-39.2%-3.0% +7.0%
Year to date -51.8%-40.4%-22.2% +12.2%
1 year -60.7%-36.6%-36.0% +13.0%
3 years —-27.3%+15.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year —-10.1%+4.9% +23.1%
5 years —-53.6%-44.4% +68.6%
5 years, per year —-14.2%-11.1% +11.0%
10 years —-55.0%— +258.0%
10 years, per year —-7.7%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureWRDBIDUYMMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 60.2%47.1%36.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 63.5%45.0%40.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.251.661.13 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.01-0.78-0.99 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.9%-55.3%-71.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -64.3%-52.1%-37.2% -1.8%
52-week high $11.72$162.52$13.30 $779.14
52-week low $4.08$77.20$7.54 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleWRDBIDUYMM
P/E now vs peer median -5.8x -5.6xmedian 38.1x 14.3xmedian 17.5x
P/S now vs peer median 14.0xmedian 17.8x 1.4xmedian 4.3x —median 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median — —median 35.4x —median 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 14.0x 5.5xmedian 27.1x 8.7xmedian 12.1x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.0x 0.6xmedian 3.4x 1.4xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median — 0.10median 1.27 0.35median 0.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsWRDBIDUYMM
Revenue $92.10M $18.33B –
Gross profit $39.20M $1.81B –
Operating income -$260.29M -$999.00M $620.89M
Net income -$237.93M -$543.00M $671.27M
Free cash flow – $4.78B $1.00B
R&D $219.70M $2.84B $145.15M
EPS (diluted) – $-11.24 $0.58
Cash & equivalents $629.27M $3.61B $1.00B
Total debt $194.84M $42.23B –
Shares (diluted) – 42.88M 1.05B
Enterprise value -$1.68B -$72.79B -$2.05B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricWRDBIDUYMM
P/E -5.8x -5.6x 14.3x
P/FCF – 5.5x 8.7x
P/Operating cash flow – 17.9x 9.0x
P/S 14.0x 1.4x –
P/B 1.4x 0.6x 1.4x
P/Tangible book 1.4x 0.7x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA – – –
EV/EBIT -2.7x -13.0x 8.4x
EV/Revenue 7.5x 0.7x –
EV/FCF – 2.7x 5.2x
EV/Operating cash flow – 8.8x 5.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.10 0.35

Growth

14 metrics
MetricWRDBIDUYMM
Revenue growth (1Y) 244.8% -0.9% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -0.5% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 142.5% 12,345% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -36.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -22.9% -140.6% 13.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -32.9% 90.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 29.9% -114.0% 21.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -30.7% 59.4%
EPS growth (1Y) – -201.2% 4.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -55.3% 40.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 2,449% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -31.9% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 236.1% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -6.5% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricWRDBIDUYMM
Gross margin 42.6% 9.9% –
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin -282.6% -5.5% –
Pretax margin -258.0% -2.3% –
Net margin -243.6% -2.6% –
FCF margin – 26.1% –
Operating cash flow margin – 8.1% –
Return on equity -24.1% -1.3% 10.3%
Return on assets -20.5% -0.8% 9.3%
Return on invested capital -24.9% -2.0% –
Return on capital employed -26.6% -1.8% 10.2%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.3x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – -2.7x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricWRDBIDUYMM
Debt / assets 6.3% 15.8% –
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – 2.3x –
Liabilities / assets 17.5% 40.1% 10.4%
Equity / assets 82.5% 59.9% 89.6%
Interest coverage – -2.7x –
Current ratio 5.4x 2.3x 8.0x
Quick ratio 4.0x 2.0x 6.6x
Cash ratio 3.7x 1.9x 6.6x
Altman Z-score 2.03 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricWRDBIDUYMM
Dividend yield – – 2.9%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – 2.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusWRDBIDUYMM
Forward P/E – 14.4xFY2026 11.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.62FY2026 $5.42FY2026 $0.75FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -29.1%FY2026 +15.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +21.8% +6.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $149.56MFY2026 $19.51BFY2026 $1.97BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +52.8%FY2026 +5.7%FY2026 +10.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +88.4% -0.6% -4.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersWRDBIDUYMM
Held by institutions 26.0% 17.5% 71.1%
Institutions holding 110 490 247
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.2% +8.1% +3.0%
Institutions buying 51 236 168
Institutions selling 35 144 58
Buyers to sellers 1.46 1.64 2.90

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

WRDBIDUYMM
WRD 1.00 0.39 0.34
BIDU 0.39 1.00 0.45
YMM 0.34 0.45 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, WRD, BIDU and YMM?

Full Truck Alliance (YMM) is the largest by market capitalisation: WeRide (WRD) $1.36B, Baidu (BIDU) $2.67B, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) $8.72B.

Which company is growing faster?

WeRide (WRD) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: WeRide (WRD) +244.8%, Baidu (BIDU) -0.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Baidu (BIDU) has the highest net margin (WeRide (WRD) -243.6%, Baidu (BIDU) -2.6%). On return on invested capital, Baidu (BIDU) leads (WeRide (WRD) -24.9%, Baidu (BIDU) -2.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Full Truck Alliance (YMM) returned the most: WeRide (WRD) -60.7%, Baidu (BIDU) -36.6%, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) -36.0%. Over five years, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) compounded fastest (Baidu (BIDU) -14.2%/yr, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) -11.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) has been the steadiest (WeRide (WRD) 60.2%, Baidu (BIDU) 47.1%, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) 36.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, WRD, BIDU and YMM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.