WPRT vs OSK vs BWA Stock Comparison

Aetherion Technologies, Oshkosh and Borgwarner Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
OSK Oshkosh Corp
$135.10 +2.7% 1M +8.2% 1Y
Market cap
$8.58B
P/E
17.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.76B
Div. yield
–
Heavy Equipment Industrials
8 wins
BWA Borgwarner Inc
$53.28 -12.6% 1M +24.4% 1Y
Market cap
$10.34B
P/E
21.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$14.24B
Div. yield
0.01%
Heavy Equipment Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Oshkosh leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Oshkosh 8, Borgwarner 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionWPRTOSKBWALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $34.58M $8.58B $10.34B BWA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.8x 17.2x 21.6x OSK
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 13.5x 9.9x BWA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -73.4% +4.2% +0.4% OSK
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -493.2% 4.6% 3.4% OSK
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -39.8% 10.2% 5.9% OSK
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.0x 0.6x — OSK
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -0.6% +8.2% +24.4% BWA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -43.0%/yr +4.8%/yr +3.4%/yr OSK
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 53.5% 39.3% 41.0% OSK
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 25/100 67/100 63/100 OSK

Percentile Scorecard

WPRTOSKBWA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisWPRTOSKBWA
Valuation 11 #180 of 203 91 #20 of 203 95 #12 of 203
Growth 31 #131 of 188 40 #113 of 188 50 #94 of 188
Profitability 4 #175 of 183 61 #72 of 183 48 #96 of 183
Financial Health 54 #100 of 216 52 #105 of 216 41 #129 of 216
Shareholder Returns – 92 #13 of 152 83 #26 of 152
Overall 25 67 63
  • WPRT ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • OSK ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • BWA ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodWPRTOSKBWASPY
1 month -2.9%+2.7%-12.6% +0.7%
3 months +18.5%-5.4%-17.3% +3.7%
6 months +2.8%-13.6%-6.5% +7.1%
Year to date +26.8%+7.5%+18.2% +12.8%
1 year -0.6%+8.2%+24.4% +11.9%
3 years -59.8%+53.5%+45.1% +85.2%
3 years, per year -26.2%+15.4%+13.2% +22.8%
5 years -94.0%+26.3%+18.2% +67.6%
5 years, per year -43.0%+4.8%+3.4% +10.9%
10 years -87.2%+154.3%+49.5% +262.0%
10 years, per year -18.6%+9.8%+4.1% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureWPRTOSKBWASPY
Volatility, 1Y 53.5%39.3%41.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 47.8%38.3%34.6% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.631.411.31 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.010.210.59 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -96.1%-43.5%-51.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.4%-24.1%-30.8% -1.2%
52-week high $2.47$177.94$77.03 $779.14
52-week low $1.54$118.59$40.96 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleWPRTOSKBWA
P/E now vs peer median -0.8xmedian 25.8x 16.8xmedian 25.8x 22.4xmedian 25.8x
P/S now vs peer median 4.1xmedian 1.9x 0.8xmedian 1.9x 0.8xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -0.5xmedian 14.6x 9.0xmedian 14.6x —median 14.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median -3.9xmedian 22.2x 8.8xmedian 22.2x 9.3xmedian 22.2x
P/B now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 2.2x 1.8xmedian 2.2x 1.8xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -0.11median 1.45 45.16median 1.45 -2.55median 1.45

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsWPRTOSKBWA
Revenue $8.50M $10.76B $14.24B
Gross profit $952.00K $1.66B $2.79B
Operating income -$23.52M $734.30M $770.00M
Net income -$41.91M $498.50M $538.00M
Free cash flow -$8.83M $942.10M $1.15B
R&D $5.35M – –
EPS (diluted) $-2.42 $8.01 $2.34
Cash & equivalents $23.95M $558.00M $1.58B
Total debt $972.00K $1.10B $3.01B
Shares (diluted) 17.34M 62.24M 204.60M
Enterprise value -$202.52M $6.88B $1.88B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricWPRTOSKBWA
P/E -0.8x 16.8x 22.4x
P/FCF -3.9x 8.8x 9.3x
P/Operating cash flow -4.4x 7.3x 6.4x
P/S 4.1x 0.8x 0.8x
P/B 0.7x 1.8x 1.8x
P/Tangible book 0.7x 2.1x 1.9x
EV/EBITDA -0.5x 9.0x –
EV/EBIT -0.5x 12.0x 15.7x
EV/Revenue 1.4x 0.8x 0.9x
EV/FCF -1.3x 9.4x 10.5x
EV/Operating cash flow -1.5x 7.8x 7.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.11 45.16 -2.55

Growth

14 metrics
MetricWPRTOSKBWA
Revenue growth (1Y) -73.4% 4.2% 0.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -70.1% 4.6% 0.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -72.0% -10.1% 6.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -72.0% 2.4% 3.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) -71.1% -22.8% 68.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -35.5% -1.5% -12.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 21.9% -25.2% 186.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 7.3% -1.5% -10.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 18.0% -22.4% 277.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 7.7% 0.4% -8.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 55.5% 16.3% -2.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.8% 36.2% 13.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 55.5% 26.0% -7.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 27.8% 69.7% 53.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricWPRTOSKBWA
Gross margin 11.2% 15.4% 19.6%
EBITDA margin -267.3% 9.1% –
Operating margin -276.7% 6.8% 5.4%
Pretax margin -423.1% 5.9% 5.3%
Net margin -493.2% 4.6% 3.4%
FCF margin -103.9% 8.8% 8.1%
Operating cash flow margin -93.2% 10.5% 11.8%
Return on equity -29.3% 11.0% 9.2%
Return on assets -19.9% 4.9% 4.0%
Return on invested capital -39.8% 10.2% 5.9%
Return on capital employed -42.2% 10.5% 8.5%
Asset turnover 0.1x 1.1x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.2x 2.3x 3.1x
Stock comp / revenue 8.2% 0.4% 1.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricWPRTOSKBWA
Debt / assets 1.1% 10.7% 22.8%
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.2x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.0x 0.6x –
Debt / FCF -0.1x 1.2x 2.6x
Liabilities / assets 38.5% 55.6% 55.6%
Equity / assets 61.5% 44.4% 44.4%
Interest coverage -100.9x 6.1x –
Current ratio 1.1x 1.7x 1.4x
Quick ratio 1.1x 0.7x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.8x 0.2x 0.4x
Altman Z-score -19.47 3.13 3.07

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricWPRTOSKBWA
Dividend yield – 1.6% 1.3%
Net buyback yield 320.2% 4.1% 6.8%
Shareholder yield 320.2% 5.7% 8.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 25.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 12.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 28.7%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – -1.4%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusWPRTOSKBWA
Forward P/E – 13.5xFY2026 9.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-1.37FY2026 $10.00FY2026 $5.38FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -7.3%FY2026 +9.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +46.4% +2.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $10.34MFY2026 $10.70BFY2026 $13.71BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -55.7%FY2026 +2.6%FY2026 -4.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +10.1% +5.3% +0.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersWPRTOSKBWA
Held by institutions 21.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 47 599 816
Change in shares held, QoQ +70.5% +5.1% +3.7%
Institutions buying 17 310 420
Institutions selling 13 188 295
Buyers to sellers 1.31 1.65 1.42

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

WPRTOSKBWA
WPRT 1.00 0.19 0.10
OSK 0.19 1.00 0.35
BWA 0.10 0.35 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, WPRT, OSK and BWA?

Borgwarner (BWA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Aetherion Technologies (WPRT) $34.58M, Oshkosh (OSK) $8.58B, Borgwarner (BWA) $10.34B.

Which stock is cheaper, WPRT, OSK and BWA?

Oshkosh (OSK) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Aetherion Technologies (WPRT) -0.8x, Oshkosh (OSK) 17.2x, Borgwarner (BWA) 21.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Borgwarner (BWA) is cheapest (Oshkosh (OSK) 13.5x, Borgwarner (BWA) 9.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Oshkosh (OSK) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Aetherion Technologies (WPRT) -73.4%, Oshkosh (OSK) +4.2%, Borgwarner (BWA) +0.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Oshkosh (OSK) has the highest net margin (Aetherion Technologies (WPRT) -493.2%, Oshkosh (OSK) 4.6%, Borgwarner (BWA) 3.4%). On return on invested capital, Oshkosh (OSK) leads (Aetherion Technologies (WPRT) -39.8%, Oshkosh (OSK) 10.2%, Borgwarner (BWA) 5.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Borgwarner (BWA) returned the most: Aetherion Technologies (WPRT) -0.6%, Oshkosh (OSK) +8.2%, Borgwarner (BWA) +24.4%. Over five years, Oshkosh (OSK) compounded fastest (Aetherion Technologies (WPRT) -43.0%/yr, Oshkosh (OSK) +4.8%/yr, Borgwarner (BWA) +3.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Oshkosh (OSK) 0.00%, Borgwarner (BWA) 0.01%. Aetherion Technologies (WPRT) and Oshkosh (OSK) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Oshkosh (OSK) has been the steadiest (Aetherion Technologies (WPRT) 53.5%, Oshkosh (OSK) 39.3%, Borgwarner (BWA) 41.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, WPRT, OSK and BWA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Oshkosh (OSK) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.