WPRT vs CVGI vs OSK Stock Comparison

Aetherion Technologies, Commercial Vehicle and Oshkosh Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
OSK Oshkosh Corp
$134.20 +1.0% 1M -3.6% 1Y
Market cap
$8.30B
P/E
15.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.61B
Div. yield
1.65%
Heavy Equipment Industrials
8 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Oshkosh leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Oshkosh 8, Commercial Vehicle 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionWPRTCVGIOSKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $37.53M $114.84M $8.30B OSK
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.9x -4.6x 15.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 13.4x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -73.4% -0.4% +2.2% OSK
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -493.2% -3.4% 5.2% OSK
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -39.8% 5.9% 11.4% OSK
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.0x 3.0x 0.7x OSK
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 1.65% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +7.5% +84.8% -3.6% CVGI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -41.4%/yr -21.6%/yr +4.5%/yr OSK
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 53.3% 82.4% 40.4% OSK
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 25/100 43/100 72/100 OSK

Percentile Scorecard

WPRTCVGIOSK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisWPRTCVGIOSK
Valuation 11 #181 of 203 85 #32 of 203 95 #12 of 203
Growth 29 #133 of 188 35 #122 of 188 59 #78 of 188
Profitability 4 #175 of 183 28 #132 of 183 63 #69 of 183
Financial Health 54 #100 of 217 23 #168 of 217 52 #105 of 217
Shareholder Returns – – 91 #15 of 153
Overall 25 43 72
  • WPRT ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • CVGI ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • OSK ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodWPRTCVGIOSKSPY
1 month +6.4%+2.3%+1.0% -0.2%
3 months +22.7%-31.9%-11.9% +3.9%
6 months +9.6%-28.6%-10.3% +8.2%
Year to date +37.6%+111.8%+6.8% +12.9%
1 year +7.5%+84.8%-3.6% +12.3%
3 years -56.4%-55.5%+55.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year -24.2%-23.7%+15.9% +23.3%
5 years -93.1%-70.4%+24.4% +67.9%
5 years, per year -41.4%-21.6%+4.5% +10.9%
10 years -87.2%-37.5%+155.2% +261.1%
10 years, per year -18.6%-4.6%+9.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureWPRTCVGIOSKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 53.3%82.4%40.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 47.3%69.4%40.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.651.631.40 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.141.03-0.09 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -96.1%-92.7%-43.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.6%-47.2%-24.6% -1.2%
52-week high $2.47$5.78$177.94 $779.14
52-week low $1.54$1.34$118.59 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleWPRTCVGIOSK
P/E now vs peer median -0.9xmedian 25.2x -4.6xmedian 25.2x 15.1xmedian 25.2x
P/S now vs peer median 4.4xmedian 1.9x 0.2xmedian 1.9x 0.8xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -0.6xmedian 14.0x 6.8xmedian 14.0x 8.7xmedian 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -4.2xmedian 21.7x -294.4xmedian 21.7x 7.4xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 2.3x 0.8xmedian 2.3x 1.8xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median -0.12median 1.32 0.14median 1.32 1.18median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsWPRTCVGIOSK
Revenue $8.50M $673.98M $10.61B
Gross profit $952.00K $75.61M $1.69B
Operating income -$23.52M $13.41M $797.60M
Net income -$41.91M -$23.05M $556.30M
Free cash flow -$8.83M -$390.00K $1.12B
R&D $5.35M – –
EPS (diluted) $-2.42 $-0.66 $8.87
Cash & equivalents $23.95M – $403.60M
Total debt $972.00K $91.78M $1.10B
Shares (diluted) 17.34M 34.77M 62.75M
Enterprise value -$199.57M $114.84M $6.95B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricWPRTCVGIOSK
P/E -0.9x -4.6x 15.1x
P/FCF -4.2x -294.4x 7.4x
P/Operating cash flow -4.7x 10.7x 6.4x
P/S 4.4x 0.2x 0.8x
P/B 0.7x 0.8x 1.8x
P/Tangible book 0.7x 0.9x 2.2x
EV/EBITDA -0.6x 6.8x 8.7x
EV/EBIT -0.6x 15.4x 11.3x
EV/Revenue 1.7x 0.3x 0.8x
EV/FCF -1.6x -529.8x 8.0x
EV/Operating cash flow -1.8x 19.3x 6.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.12 0.14 1.18

Growth

14 metrics
MetricWPRTCVGIOSK
Revenue growth (1Y) -73.4% -0.4% 2.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -70.1% -6.0% 5.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -72.0% 13.2% -10.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -72.0% -12.1% 7.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) -71.1% 425.0% -16.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -35.5% -31.0% 8.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 21.9% 39.8% -14.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 7.3% -33.9% 11.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 18.0% 41.5% -11.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 7.7% -32.2% 12.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 55.5% 211.2% 60.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.8% -49.8% 57.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 55.5% 98.2% 99.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 27.8% -26.1% 49.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricWPRTCVGIOSK
Gross margin 11.2% 11.2% 15.9%
EBITDA margin -267.3% 4.5% 9.8%
Operating margin -276.7% 2.0% 7.5%
Pretax margin -423.1% -2.4% 6.5%
Net margin -493.2% -3.4% 5.2%
FCF margin -103.9% -0.1% 10.6%
Operating cash flow margin -93.2% 1.6% 12.3%
Return on equity -29.3% -17.3% 12.4%
Return on assets -19.9% -5.3% 5.6%
Return on invested capital -39.8% 5.9% 11.4%
Return on capital employed -42.2% 4.9% 11.5%
Asset turnover 0.1x 1.6x 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.2x -0.5x 2.3x
Stock comp / revenue 8.2% 0.7% 0.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricWPRTCVGIOSK
Debt / assets 1.1% 20.2% 11.0%
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.7x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.0x 3.0x 0.7x
Debt / FCF -0.1x -235.3x 1.0x
Liabilities / assets 38.5% 70.1% 55.0%
Equity / assets 61.5% 29.9% 45.0%
Interest coverage -100.9x 0.9x 6.6x
Current ratio 1.1x 2.0x 1.7x
Quick ratio 1.1x – 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.8x – 0.1x
Altman Z-score -19.42 1.88 3.18

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricWPRTCVGIOSK
Dividend yield – – 1.7%
Net buyback yield 295.0% – 4.2%
Shareholder yield 295.0% – 5.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusWPRTCVGIOSK
Forward P/E – – 13.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-1.37FY2026 $-0.20FY2026 $10.00FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – -7.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +46.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $10.34MFY2026 $777.74MFY2026 $10.70BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -55.7%FY2026 +19.8%FY2026 +2.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +10.1% +3.3% +5.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersWPRTCVGIOSK
Held by institutions 21.0% 60.7% 100.0%
Institutions holding 46 111 598
Change in shares held, QoQ +70.5% +55.8% +5.1%
Institutions buying 16 80 309
Institutions selling 13 20 188
Buyers to sellers 1.23 4.00 1.64

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

WPRTCVGIOSK
WPRT 1.00 0.06 0.19
CVGI 0.06 1.00 0.17
OSK 0.19 0.17 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, WPRT, CVGI and OSK?

Oshkosh (OSK) is the largest by market capitalisation: Aetherion Technologies (WPRT) $37.53M, Commercial Vehicle (CVGI) $114.84M, Oshkosh (OSK) $8.30B.

Which company is growing faster?

Oshkosh (OSK) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Aetherion Technologies (WPRT) -73.4%, Commercial Vehicle (CVGI) -0.4%, Oshkosh (OSK) +2.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Oshkosh (OSK) has the highest net margin (Aetherion Technologies (WPRT) -493.2%, Commercial Vehicle (CVGI) -3.4%, Oshkosh (OSK) 5.2%). On return on invested capital, Oshkosh (OSK) leads (Aetherion Technologies (WPRT) -39.8%, Commercial Vehicle (CVGI) 5.9%, Oshkosh (OSK) 11.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Commercial Vehicle (CVGI) returned the most: Aetherion Technologies (WPRT) +7.5%, Commercial Vehicle (CVGI) +84.8%, Oshkosh (OSK) -3.6%. Over five years, Oshkosh (OSK) compounded fastest (Aetherion Technologies (WPRT) -41.4%/yr, Commercial Vehicle (CVGI) -21.6%/yr, Oshkosh (OSK) +4.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Oshkosh (OSK) 1.65%. Aetherion Technologies (WPRT) and Commercial Vehicle (CVGI) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Oshkosh (OSK) has been the steadiest (Aetherion Technologies (WPRT) 53.3%, Commercial Vehicle (CVGI) 82.4%, Oshkosh (OSK) 40.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, WPRT, CVGI and OSK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Oshkosh (OSK) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.