WPM vs OAK-PA vs CG Stock Comparison

Wheaton Precious Metals, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings and Carlyle Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
WPM Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
$123.24 -8.9% 1M +29.5% 1Y
Market cap
$52.33B
P/E
25.7x
Revenue (TTM)
-$35.66M
Div. yield
0.01%
Alternative Asset Managers Financial Services
6 wins
CG Carlyle Group Inc.
$40.57 +2.2% 1M -29.6% 1Y
Market cap
$14.32B
P/E
39.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.61B
Div. yield
0.04%
Alternative Asset Managers Financial Services
1 win

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Wheaton Precious Metals leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Wheaton Precious Metals 6, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings 5, Carlyle 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionWPMOAK-PACGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $52.33B $2.33B $14.32B WPM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 25.7x 7.8x 39.3x OAK-PA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 29.0x — 10.9x CG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -6.5% -2.3% -41.9% OAK-PA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 48.6% 10.1% OAK-PA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 18.7% — 6.4% WPM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.7x — 1.8x WPM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.07% 0.04% OAK-PA
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +29.5% -12.6% -29.6% WPM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +25.0%/yr -6.2%/yr -6.3%/yr WPM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 50.8% 14.6% 37.4% OAK-PA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 78/100 42/100 32/100 WPM

Percentile Scorecard

WPMOAK-PACG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisWPMOAK-PACG
Valuation 75 #46 of 181 36 #116 of 181 31 #125 of 181
Growth 92 #10 of 110 60 #45 of 110 5 #105 of 110
Profitability 98 #3 of 127 51 #63 of 127 29 #91 of 127
Financial Health 78 #37 of 162 45 #89 of 162 53 #77 of 162
Shareholder Returns 47 #41 of 76 16 #64 of 76 45 #42 of 76
Overall 78 42 32
  • WPM ranked among 209 companies in Asset and Wealth Management
  • OAK-PA ranked among 209 companies in Asset and Wealth Management
  • CG ranked among 209 companies in Asset and Wealth Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodWPMOAK-PACGSPY
1 month -8.9%-3.8%+2.2% +0.7%
3 months +8.7%-6.9%-10.6% +3.7%
6 months -2.5%-6.4%-19.0% +7.1%
Year to date +4.9%-7.0%-31.4% +12.8%
1 year +29.5%-12.6%-29.6% +11.9%
3 years +183.5%+1.9%+45.9% +85.2%
3 years, per year +41.6%+0.6%+13.4% +22.8%
5 years +205.0%-27.2%-27.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year +25.0%-6.2%-6.3% +10.9%
10 years +425.8%—+156.8% +262.0%
10 years, per year +18.1%—+9.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureWPMOAK-PACGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 50.8%14.6%37.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 54.3%16.5%39.0% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.950.201.46 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.58-0.86-0.79 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -43.8%-28.7%-57.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -25.6%-12.6%-38.6% -1.2%
52-week high $165.72$22.31$66.12 $779.14
52-week low $94.37$19.51$35.77 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleWPMOAK-PACG
P/E now vs peer median 27.4xmedian 33.5x 7.7xmedian 33.5x 39.9xmedian 33.5x
P/S now vs peer median -1,569xmedian 4.9x 5.1xmedian 4.9x 4.0xmedian 4.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 22.0xmedian 12.0x —median 12.0x 16.3xmedian 12.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 22.0xmedian 14.3x -13.4xmedian 14.3x -3.5xmedian 14.3x
P/B now vs peer median 5.8xmedian 1.8x 1.5xmedian 1.8x 2.0xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 0.47median 0.97 0.34median 0.97 -8.96median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsWPMOAK-PACG
Revenue -$35.66M $617.93M $3.61B
Gross profit $2.40B – –
Operating income $2.28B – –
Net income $2.05B $716.53M $540.90M
Free cash flow $2.54B -$233.55M -$4.12B
EPS (diluted) $4.48 $2.53 $0.99
Cash & equivalents $100.19M $255.46M $1.26B
Total debt $1.99B $4.99B $11.98B
Shares (diluted) 454.69M 118.83M 367.30M
Enterprise value $47.75B $1.29B $7.20B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricWPMOAK-PACG
P/E 27.4x 7.7x 39.9x
P/FCF 22.0x -13.4x -3.5x
P/Operating cash flow 22.0x -13.4x -3.6x
P/S -1,569x 5.1x 4.0x
P/B 5.8x 1.5x 2.0x
P/Tangible book 5.8x 1.5x 2.0x
EV/EBITDA 22.0x – 16.3x
EV/EBIT 25.4x – 20.4x
EV/Revenue -1,622x 7.1x 4.5x
EV/FCF 22.7x -18.7x -3.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 22.7x -18.7x -4.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.47 0.34 -8.96

Growth

14 metrics
MetricWPMOAK-PACG
Revenue growth (1Y) -6.5% -2.3% -41.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -17.4% -14.4% 4.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 114.5% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 69.4% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 149.2% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 73.5% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 159.9% 44.9% -59.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 49.4% 9.2% 5.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 158.1% 140.7% -71.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 58.1% 22.7% -4.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 88.5% -130.2% -4,787%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 56.5% 43.7% -81.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 88.5% -130.2% -2,448%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 56.5% 43.7% -78.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricWPMOAK-PACG
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – 27.3%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – – 17.8%
Net margin – 48.6% 10.1%
FCF margin – -37.8% -114.2%
Operating cash flow margin -7,135% -37.8% -110.7%
Return on equity 21.5% 32.5% 7.4%
Return on assets 18.5% 10.0% 1.9%
Return on invested capital 18.7% – 6.4%
Return on capital employed 21.2% – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.1x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x -0.3x -7.4x
Stock comp / revenue -67.5% – 11.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricWPMOAK-PACG
Debt / assets 16.3% 21.2% 10.6%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.7x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.7x – 1.8x
Debt / FCF 0.8x -6.4x -0.7x
Liabilities / assets 20.3% 70.9% 74.4%
Equity / assets 79.7% 29.1% 25.6%
Interest coverage 61.9x – 5.4x
Current ratio 0.5x – –
Quick ratio 0.5x – –
Cash ratio 0.4x – –
Altman Z-score 14.85 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricWPMOAK-PACG
Dividend yield 0.6% 0.0% 3.5%
Net buyback yield 0.0% – 6.4%
Shareholder yield 0.6% 0.0% 9.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) 23.5% 22.5% 93.3%
Payout ratio (FCF) 19.0% -68.9% -12.2%
Dividend growth (1Y) 11.7% -68.0% 0.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 7.9% 3.0% 1.6%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusWPMOAK-PACG
Forward P/E 29.0xFY2026 – 10.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.25FY2026 – $3.73FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +40.7%FY2026 – -7.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +22.8% – +26.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.35BFY2026 – $3.88BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +45.2%FY2026 – -0.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +24.2% – +29.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersWPMOAK-PACG
Held by institutions 63.9% – 61.2%
Institutions holding 847 – 580
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.8% – +0.4%
Institutions buying 420 – 292
Institutions selling 266 – 197
Buyers to sellers 1.58 – 1.48

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

WPMOAK-PACG
WPM 1.00 0.11 0.23
OAK-PA 0.11 1.00 0.16
CG 0.23 0.16 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, WPM, OAK-PA and CG?

Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) $52.33B, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) $2.33B, Carlyle (CG) $14.32B.

Which stock is cheaper, WPM, OAK-PA and CG?

Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) 25.7x, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) 7.8x, Carlyle (CG) 39.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Carlyle (CG) is cheapest (Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) 29.0x, Carlyle (CG) 10.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) -6.5%, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) -2.3%, Carlyle (CG) -41.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) has the highest net margin (Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) 48.6%, Carlyle (CG) 10.1%). On return on invested capital, Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) leads (Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) 18.7%, Carlyle (CG) 6.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) returned the most: Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) +29.5%, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) -12.6%, Carlyle (CG) -29.6%. Over five years, Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) compounded fastest (Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) +25.0%/yr, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) -6.2%/yr, Carlyle (CG) -6.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) has the highest dividend yield: Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) 0.01%, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) 0.07%, Carlyle (CG) 0.04%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) has been the steadiest (Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) 50.8%, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) 14.6%, Carlyle (CG) 37.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, WPM, OAK-PA and CG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.