WM vs RSG vs GFL Stock Comparison

Waste Management, Republic Services and GFL Environmental Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
WM Waste Management Inc
$241.10 +16.5% 1M +12.3% 1Y
Market cap
$95.36B
P/E
33.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$25.67B
Div. yield
0.01%
Solid Waste Industrials
5 wins
RSG Republic Services, Inc.
$241.35 +13.8% 1M +8.2% 1Y
Market cap
$73.54B
P/E
33.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.89B
Div. yield
0.01%
Solid Waste Industrials
6 wins
GFL GFL Environmental Inc.
$45.68 +8.1% 1M +0.2% 1Y
Market cap
$16.75B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$7.00B
Div. yield
–
Solid Waste Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Republic Services leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Republic Services 6, Waste Management 5, GFL Environmental 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionWMRSGGFLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $95.36B $73.54B $16.75B WM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 33.4x 33.6x -334.4x WM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.9x 32.4x 73.7x WM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.2% +3.2% +9.7% GFL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 11.1% 12.9% -0.7% RSG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.7% 11.0% 7.6% RSG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.0x 2.6x 3.0x RSG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.01% 0.00% WM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +12.3% +8.2% +0.2% WM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +9.2%/yr +13.3%/yr +2.8%/yr RSG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.3% 20.3% 29.1% RSG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 58/100 49/100 RSG

Percentile Scorecard

WMRSGGFL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisWMRSGGFL
Valuation 53 #8 of 16 47 #9 of 16 80 #4 of 16
Growth 69 #5 of 14 54 #7 of 14 23 #11 of 14
Profitability 92 #2 of 14 100 #1 of 14 54 #7 of 14
Financial Health 13 #14 of 16 33 #11 of 16 40 #10 of 16
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 57 58 49
  • WM ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management
  • RSG ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management
  • GFL ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodWMRSGGFLSPY
1 month +16.5%+13.8%+8.1% -0.8%
3 months +1.4%+11.3%+17.2% +3.5%
6 months +6.6%+17.1%+15.1% +7.0%
Year to date +9.7%+13.9%+6.4% +12.2%
1 year +12.3%+8.2%+0.2% +13.0%
3 years +49.4%+65.3%+62.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year +14.3%+18.3%+17.5% +23.1%
5 years +55.4%+86.9%+14.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year +9.2%+13.3%+2.8% +11.0%
10 years +276.9%+370.6%— +258.0%
10 years, per year +14.2%+16.8%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureWMRSGGFLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.3%20.3%29.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 20.7%18.9%28.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.41-0.420.25 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.580.400.01 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -18.7%-23.4%-42.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -2.2%-0.2%-1.8% -1.8%
52-week high $246.51$241.83$46.51 $779.14
52-week low $196.77$197.73$33.54 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleWMRSGGFL
P/E now vs peer median 33.9xmedian 34.0x 34.0xmedian 34.0x -337.0xmedian 34.0x
P/S now vs peer median 3.8xmedian 3.4x 4.4xmedian 3.4x 2.4xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.9xmedian 15.3x 16.4xmedian 15.3x 8.4xmedian 15.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 27.0xmedian 18.5x 27.9xmedian 18.5x 6.2xmedian 18.5x
P/B now vs peer median 9.7xmedian 3.0x 6.1xmedian 3.0x 2.2xmedian 3.0x
PEG now vs peer median 4.17median 3.42 2.68median 3.42 -12.15median 3.42

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsWMRSGGFL
Revenue $25.67B $16.89B $7.00B
Gross profit $10.49B $7.09B $1.47B
Operating income $4.51B $3.37B $1.71B
Net income $2.85B $2.19B -$249.50M
Free cash flow $3.57B $2.65B $2.72B
EPS (diluted) $7.09 $7.10 $-0.13
Cash & equivalents $557.00M $107.00M $192.10M
Total debt $93.65B $14.07B $19.12B
Shares (diluted) 402.40M 307.63M 378.69M
Enterprise value $94.27B $73.15B $14.87B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricWMRSGGFL
P/E 33.9x 34.0x -337.0x
P/FCF 27.0x 27.9x 6.2x
P/Operating cash flow 14.8x 16.3x 11.2x
P/S 3.8x 4.4x 2.4x
P/B 9.7x 6.1x 2.2x
P/Tangible book 15.3x 6.5x 3.2x
EV/EBITDA 15.9x 16.4x 8.4x
EV/EBIT 26.4x 26.1x 15.4x
EV/Revenue 4.6x 5.2x 3.8x
EV/FCF 33.4x 33.1x 9.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 18.3x 19.3x 17.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 4.17 2.68 -12.15

Growth

14 metrics
MetricWMRSGGFL
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.2% 3.2% 9.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.6% 5.4% -1.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -18.6% 2.5% 16.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.8% 7.8% 12.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 7.3% 1.6% 1.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 9.1% 9.1% -3.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 4.8% 2.9% -107.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 7.7% 11.5% 8.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 5.3% 4.9% -101.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 8.1% 12.7% 27.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 15.9% 9.2% 13.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.8% 10.2% -8.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 65.2% 12.6% 7.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 33.4% 12.3% -2.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricWMRSGGFL
Gross margin 40.9% 42.0% 20.9%
EBITDA margin 29.3% 31.7% 44.5%
Operating margin 17.6% 19.9% 24.4%
Pretax margin 14.1% 15.2% -3.8%
Net margin 11.1% 12.9% -0.7%
FCF margin 13.9% 15.7% 38.9%
Operating cash flow margin 25.4% 26.9% 21.6%
Return on equity 28.6% 18.2% -3.3%
Return on assets 6.2% 6.3% -1.2%
Return on invested capital 10.7% 11.0% 7.6%
Return on capital employed 11.2% 10.9% 8.9%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.5x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.3x 2.1x -6.1x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% – 2.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricWMRSGGFL
Debt / assets 50.3% 40.0% 44.6%
Debt / equity 2.4x 1.2x 1.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.0x 2.6x 3.0x
Debt / FCF 6.5x 5.3x 3.5x
Liabilities / assets 78.6% 65.8% 65.0%
Equity / assets 21.4% 34.2% 35.0%
Interest coverage – 5.7x 3.0x
Current ratio 0.9x 0.6x 0.8x
Quick ratio 0.8x 0.6x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.0x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 2.99 3.14 1.27

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricWMRSGGFL
Dividend yield 1.5% 1.1% 0.2%
Net buyback yield 1.0% 2.0% –
Shareholder yield 2.5% 3.0% 0.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) 50.1% 34.8% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 40.0% 28.7% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 12.4% 6.9% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 8.9% 7.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusWMRSGGFL
Forward P/E 27.9xFY2026 32.4xFY2026 73.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $8.65FY2026 $7.45FY2026 $0.62FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +15.3%FY2026 +6.1%FY2026 +12.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +9.5% +5.8% +25.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $25.84BFY2026 $16.59BFY2026 $6.08BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.6%FY2026 +0.0%FY2026 +26.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +12.0% +15.6% +22.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersWMRSGGFL
Held by institutions 82.3% 58.9% 74.8%
Institutions holding 2,348 1,302 323
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.8% +0.5% +10.3%
Institutions buying 1,094 622 185
Institutions selling 901 484 101
Buyers to sellers 1.21 1.29 1.83

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

WMRSGGFL
WM 1.00 0.83 0.41
RSG 0.83 1.00 0.41
GFL 0.41 0.41 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, WM, RSG and GFL?

Waste Management (WM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Waste Management (WM) $95.36B, Republic Services (RSG) $73.54B, GFL Environmental (GFL) $16.75B.

Which stock is cheaper, WM, RSG and GFL?

Waste Management (WM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Waste Management (WM) 33.4x, Republic Services (RSG) 33.6x, GFL Environmental (GFL) -334.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Waste Management (WM) is cheapest (Waste Management (WM) 27.9x, Republic Services (RSG) 32.4x, GFL Environmental (GFL) 73.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

GFL Environmental (GFL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Waste Management (WM) +7.2%, Republic Services (RSG) +3.2%, GFL Environmental (GFL) +9.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Republic Services (RSG) has the highest net margin (Waste Management (WM) 11.1%, Republic Services (RSG) 12.9%, GFL Environmental (GFL) -0.7%). On return on invested capital, Republic Services (RSG) leads (Waste Management (WM) 10.7%, Republic Services (RSG) 11.0%, GFL Environmental (GFL) 7.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Waste Management (WM) returned the most: Waste Management (WM) +12.3%, Republic Services (RSG) +8.2%, GFL Environmental (GFL) +0.2%. Over five years, Republic Services (RSG) compounded fastest (Waste Management (WM) +9.2%/yr, Republic Services (RSG) +13.3%/yr, GFL Environmental (GFL) +2.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Waste Management (WM) has the highest dividend yield: Waste Management (WM) 0.01%, Republic Services (RSG) 0.01%, GFL Environmental (GFL) 0.00%. GFL Environmental (GFL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Republic Services (RSG) has been the steadiest (Waste Management (WM) 21.3%, Republic Services (RSG) 20.3%, GFL Environmental (GFL) 29.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, WM, RSG and GFL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Republic Services (RSG) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.