WM vs RETO vs CWST Stock Comparison

Waste Management, ReTo Eco-Solutions and Casella Waste Systems Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
WM Waste Management Inc
$235.63 +13.9% 1M +10.2% 1Y
Market cap
$90.37B
P/E
29.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$26.07B
Div. yield
–
Solid Waste Industrials
7 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Waste Management leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Waste Management 7, Casella Waste Systems 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionWMRETOCWSTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $90.37B $4.77K $5.64B WM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 29.4x 0.0x 988.3x WM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.2x — 72.6x WM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.2% — +13.6% CWST
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — 0.3% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 1.5% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 3.4x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +10.2% -96.1% +5.5% WM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +8.4%/yr -87.0%/yr +2.4%/yr WM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.4% 353.7% 37.0% WM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 61/100 — 47/100 WM

Percentile Scorecard

WMRETOCWST

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisWMRETOCWST
Valuation 60 #7 of 16 67 #6 of 16 40 #10 of 16
Growth 77 #4 of 14 – 39 #9 of 14
Profitability 92 #2 of 14 – 62 #6 of 14
Financial Health 13 #14 of 16 87 #3 of 16 47 #9 of 16
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 61 – 47
  • WM ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management
  • RETO ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management
  • CWST ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodWMRETOCWSTSPY
1 month +13.9%+433.3%+13.9% -0.2%
3 months -1.6%-69.0%+2.9% +3.9%
6 months +3.6%-68.4%+20.5% +8.2%
Year to date +7.2%-89.5%-4.3% +12.9%
1 year +10.2%-96.1%+5.5% +12.3%
3 years +46.0%-99.9%+27.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year +13.5%-91.4%+8.4% +23.3%
5 years +49.6%-100.0%+12.7% +67.9%
5 years, per year +8.4%-87.0%+2.4% +10.9%
10 years +271.9%—+755.8% +261.1%
10 years, per year +14.0%—+24.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureWMRETOCWSTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.4%353.7%37.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 20.8%244.5%34.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.422.240.09 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.48-0.270.15 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -18.7%-100.0%-37.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.4%-96.1%-12.7% -1.2%
52-week high $246.51$20.40$107.34 $779.14
52-week low $196.77$0.09$74.97 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleWMRETOCWST
P/E now vs peer median 30.8xmedian 33.2x 0.0xmedian 33.2x 1,045xmedian 33.2x
P/S now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 3.3x 0.1xmedian 3.3x 3.0xmedian 3.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.5x —median 14.5x 18.3xmedian 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 23.2xmedian 16.4x 0.0xmedian 16.4x 55.6xmedian 16.4x
P/B now vs peer median 9.6xmedian 3.0x 0.0xmedian 3.0x 3.7xmedian 3.0x
PEG now vs peer median 3.00median 2.81 —median 2.81 -20.53median 2.81

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsWMRETOCWST
Revenue $26.07B – $1.96B
Gross profit – – $653.52M
Operating income $4.80B – $66.07M
Net income $3.07B – $5.70M
Free cash flow – – $105.67M
EPS (diluted) $7.63 – $0.09
Cash & equivalents $247.00M $250.01K $25.54M
Total debt – $13.30M $1.36B
Shares (diluted) 402.40M 5.97K 63.69M
Enterprise value $90.37B -$4.97M $4.76B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricWMRETOCWST
P/E 30.8x 0.0x 1,045x
P/FCF 23.2x 0.0x 55.6x
P/Operating cash flow 8.2x – 16.7x
P/S 3.6x 0.1x 3.0x
P/B 9.6x 0.0x 3.7x
P/Tangible book 14.9x 0.0x 4.7x
EV/EBITDA – – 18.3x
EV/EBIT – – 109.1x
EV/Revenue 3.6x – 3.7x
EV/FCF – – 68.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 8.2x – 20.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.00 – -20.53

Growth

14 metrics
MetricWMRETOCWST
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.2% – 13.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.0% – 20.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 12.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 20.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 17.9% – 1.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 10.5% – -8.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 19.7% – -48.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 10.0% – -47.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 20.3% – -48.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 10.3% – -50.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 95.1% – 2.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 37.6% – 19.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – 16.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 8.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricWMRETOCWST
Gross margin – – 33.4%
EBITDA margin – – 20.1%
Operating margin – – 3.4%
Pretax margin – – 0.5%
Net margin – – 0.3%
FCF margin – – 5.4%
Operating cash flow margin 43.8% – 18.0%
Return on equity 31.0% – 0.4%
Return on assets 6.6% – 0.2%
Return on invested capital – – 1.5%
Return on capital employed – – 2.1%
Asset turnover 0.6x – 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.7x – 61.6x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricWMRETOCWST
Debt / assets – 7.0% 38.3%
Debt / equity – 0.1x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 3.4x
Debt / FCF – – 12.9x
Liabilities / assets 78.8% 22.3% 55.6%
Equity / assets 21.2% 77.7% 44.4%
Interest coverage – – 1.0x
Current ratio 0.8x 0.2x 1.0x
Quick ratio – 24,122x 0.8x
Cash ratio – 0.0x 0.1x
Altman Z-score – – 2.34

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricWMRETOCWST
Dividend yield 1.5% – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 1.5% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusWMRETOCWST
Forward P/E 27.2xFY2026 – 72.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $8.65FY2026 – $1.29FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +15.3%FY2026 – +1.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +9.5% – +16.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $25.84BFY2026 – $2.05BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.6%FY2026 – +11.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +12.0% – +7.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersWMRETOCWST
Held by institutions 82.3% – 100.0%
Institutions holding 2,348 – 415
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.8% – +4.2%
Institutions buying 1,094 – 231
Institutions selling 901 – 127
Buyers to sellers 1.21 – 1.82

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

WMRETOCWST
WM 1.00 0.05 0.55
RETO 0.05 1.00 0.09
CWST 0.55 0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, WM, RETO and CWST?

Waste Management (WM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Waste Management (WM) $90.37B, ReTo Eco-Solutions (RETO) $4.77K, Casella Waste Systems (CWST) $5.64B.

Which stock is cheaper, WM, RETO and CWST?

Waste Management (WM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Waste Management (WM) 29.4x, ReTo Eco-Solutions (RETO) 0.0x, Casella Waste Systems (CWST) 988.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Waste Management (WM) is cheapest (Waste Management (WM) 27.2x, Casella Waste Systems (CWST) 72.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Casella Waste Systems (CWST) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Waste Management (WM) +5.2%, Casella Waste Systems (CWST) +13.6%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Waste Management (WM) returned the most: Waste Management (WM) +10.2%, ReTo Eco-Solutions (RETO) -96.1%, Casella Waste Systems (CWST) +5.5%. Over five years, Waste Management (WM) compounded fastest (Waste Management (WM) +8.4%/yr, ReTo Eco-Solutions (RETO) -87.0%/yr, Casella Waste Systems (CWST) +2.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Waste Management (WM) has been the steadiest (Waste Management (WM) 21.4%, ReTo Eco-Solutions (RETO) 353.7%, Casella Waste Systems (CWST) 37.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, WM, RETO and CWST?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Waste Management (WM) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.