WM vs CWST vs CLH Stock Comparison

Waste Management, Casella Waste Systems and Clean Harbors Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
WM Waste Management Inc
$239.38 +15.1% 1M +10.8% 1Y
Market cap
$96.86B
P/E
34.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$25.67B
Div. yield
0.01%
Solid Waste Industrials
6 wins
CLH Clean Harbors Inc
$318.70 +1.8% 1M +30.8% 1Y
Market cap
$16.74B
P/E
38.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.24B
Div. yield
–
Hazardous Waste Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Waste Management leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Waste Management 6, Clean Harbors 4, Casella Waste Systems 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionWMCWSTCLHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $96.86B $6.12B $16.74B WM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 34.0x 1,074x 38.1x WM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.7x 75.7x 31.1x WM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.2% +13.6% +5.1% CWST
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 11.1% 0.3% 7.0% WM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.7% 1.5% 9.7% WM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.0x 3.4x 1.9x CLH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +10.8% +7.5% +30.8% CLH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +7.8%/yr +3.1%/yr +22.7%/yr CLH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.3% 37.0% 27.9% WM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 41/100 66/100 CLH

Percentile Scorecard

WMCWSTCLH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisWMCWSTCLH
Valuation 47 #9 of 16 40 #10 of 16 60 #7 of 16
Growth 77 #4 of 14 39 #9 of 14 54 #7 of 14
Profitability 92 #2 of 14 54 #7 of 14 77 #4 of 14
Financial Health 13 #14 of 16 33 #11 of 16 80 #4 of 16
Shareholder Returns 43 #5 of 8 – 57 #4 of 8
Overall 54 41 66
  • WM ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management
  • CWST ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management
  • CLH ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodWMCWSTCLHSPY
1 month +15.1%+15.1%+1.8% -1.0%
3 months +0.2%+9.2%+4.9% +2.9%
6 months +4.3%+21.7%+3.1% +6.4%
Year to date +9.0%-0.3%+35.9% +11.4%
1 year +10.8%+7.5%+30.8% +13.1%
3 years +54.8%+30.1%+105.0% +79.4%
3 years, per year +15.7%+9.2%+27.1% +21.5%
5 years +45.6%+16.7%+177.7% +67.7%
5 years, per year +7.8%+3.1%+22.7% +10.9%
10 years +284.8%+793.9%+603.7% +255.2%
10 years, per year +14.4%+24.5%+21.5% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureWMCWSTCLHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.3%37.0%27.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 20.5%34.1%31.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.420.100.26 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.510.201.11 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -18.7%-37.7%-30.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -2.9%-9.1%-2.6% -2.5%
52-week high $246.51$107.34$327.10 $779.14
52-week low $196.77$74.97$201.73 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleWMCWSTCLH
P/E now vs peer median 33.7xmedian 33.8x 1,089xmedian 33.8x 38.3xmedian 33.8x
P/S now vs peer median 3.7xmedian 3.4x 3.1xmedian 3.4x 2.7xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.8xmedian 15.8x 18.9xmedian 15.8x 15.9xmedian 15.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 26.8xmedian 18.4x 57.9xmedian 18.4x 36.4xmedian 18.4x
P/B now vs peer median 9.6xmedian 3.1x 3.9xmedian 3.1x 5.7xmedian 3.1x
PEG now vs peer median 4.14median 4.14 -21.38median 4.14 10.77median 4.14

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsWMCWSTCLH
Revenue $25.67B $1.96B $6.24B
Gross profit $10.49B $653.52M $2.01B
Operating income $4.51B $66.07M $739.29M
Net income $2.85B $5.70M $439.05M
Free cash flow $3.57B $105.67M $461.72M
EPS (diluted) $7.09 $0.09 $8.29
Cash & equivalents $557.00M $25.54M $408.36M
Total debt $93.65B $1.36B $2.77B
Shares (diluted) 402.40M 63.69M 52.96M
Enterprise value $95.77B $5.24B $13.75B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricWMCWSTCLH
P/E 33.7x 1,089x 38.3x
P/FCF 26.8x 57.9x 36.4x
P/Operating cash flow 14.7x 17.4x 18.6x
P/S 3.7x 3.1x 2.7x
P/B 9.6x 3.9x 5.7x
P/Tangible book 15.2x 4.9x 7.7x
EV/EBITDA 15.8x 18.9x 15.9x
EV/EBIT 26.3x 112.8x 25.8x
EV/Revenue 4.6x 3.8x 3.1x
EV/FCF 33.2x 70.5x 41.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 18.2x 21.2x 21.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 4.14 -21.38 10.77

Growth

14 metrics
MetricWMCWSTCLH
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.2% 13.6% 5.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.6% 20.4% 5.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -18.6% 12.6% 10.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.8% 20.0% 6.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 7.3% 1.1% 13.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 9.1% -8.5% 4.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 4.8% -48.4% 14.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 7.7% -47.8% 2.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 5.3% -48.5% 15.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 8.1% -50.9% 3.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 15.9% 2.9% 19.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.8% 19.0% 7.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 65.2% 16.1% 20.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 33.4% 8.9% 12.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricWMCWSTCLH
Gross margin 40.9% 33.4% 32.3%
EBITDA margin 29.3% 20.1% 19.2%
Operating margin 17.6% 3.4% 11.8%
Pretax margin 14.1% 0.5% 9.6%
Net margin 11.1% 0.3% 7.0%
FCF margin 13.9% 5.4% 7.4%
Operating cash flow margin 25.4% 18.0% 14.5%
Return on equity 28.6% 0.4% 15.4%
Return on assets 6.2% 0.2% 5.7%
Return on invested capital 10.7% 1.5% 9.7%
Return on capital employed 11.2% 2.1% 11.3%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.6x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.3x 61.6x 2.1x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 0.7% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricWMCWSTCLH
Debt / assets 50.3% 38.3% 35.4%
Debt / equity 2.4x 0.9x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.0x 3.4x 1.9x
Debt / FCF 6.5x 12.9x 6.0x
Liabilities / assets 78.6% 55.6% 62.6%
Equity / assets 21.4% 44.4% 37.4%
Interest coverage – 1.0x –
Current ratio 0.9x 1.0x 2.1x
Quick ratio 0.8x 0.8x 1.7x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.1x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 2.97 2.42 3.90

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricWMCWSTCLH
Dividend yield 1.5% – –
Net buyback yield 1.0% – 1.4%
Shareholder yield 2.5% – 1.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) 50.1% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 40.0% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 12.4% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 8.9% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusWMCWSTCLH
Forward P/E 27.7xFY2026 75.7xFY2026 31.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $8.65FY2026 $1.29FY2026 $10.26FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +15.3%FY2026 +1.6%FY2026 +40.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +9.5% +17.1% +4.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $25.84BFY2026 $2.05BFY2026 $6.27BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.6%FY2026 +11.6%FY2026 +4.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +12.0% +7.1% +15.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersWMCWSTCLH
Held by institutions 82.3% 100.0% 93.5%
Institutions holding 2,348 415 658
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.8% +4.2% 0.0%
Institutions buying 1,094 231 306
Institutions selling 901 127 246
Buyers to sellers 1.21 1.82 1.24

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

WMCWSTCLH
WM 1.00 0.55 0.30
CWST 0.55 1.00 0.31
CLH 0.30 0.31 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, WM, CWST and CLH?

Waste Management (WM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Waste Management (WM) $96.86B, Casella Waste Systems (CWST) $6.12B, Clean Harbors (CLH) $16.74B.

Which stock is cheaper, WM, CWST and CLH?

Waste Management (WM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Waste Management (WM) 34.0x, Casella Waste Systems (CWST) 1,074x, Clean Harbors (CLH) 38.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Waste Management (WM) is cheapest (Waste Management (WM) 27.7x, Casella Waste Systems (CWST) 75.7x, Clean Harbors (CLH) 31.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Casella Waste Systems (CWST) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Waste Management (WM) +7.2%, Casella Waste Systems (CWST) +13.6%, Clean Harbors (CLH) +5.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Waste Management (WM) has the highest net margin (Waste Management (WM) 11.1%, Casella Waste Systems (CWST) 0.3%, Clean Harbors (CLH) 7.0%). On return on invested capital, Waste Management (WM) leads (Waste Management (WM) 10.7%, Casella Waste Systems (CWST) 1.5%, Clean Harbors (CLH) 9.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Clean Harbors (CLH) returned the most: Waste Management (WM) +10.8%, Casella Waste Systems (CWST) +7.5%, Clean Harbors (CLH) +30.8%. Over five years, Clean Harbors (CLH) compounded fastest (Waste Management (WM) +7.8%/yr, Casella Waste Systems (CWST) +3.1%/yr, Clean Harbors (CLH) +22.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Waste Management (WM) 0.01%, Casella Waste Systems (CWST) 0.00%, Clean Harbors (CLH) 0.00%. Casella Waste Systems (CWST) and Clean Harbors (CLH) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Waste Management (WM) has been the steadiest (Waste Management (WM) 21.3%, Casella Waste Systems (CWST) 37.0%, Clean Harbors (CLH) 27.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, WM, CWST and CLH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Waste Management (WM) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.