WIT vs INGM vs GLOB Stock Comparison

Wipro, Ingram Micro Holding and Globant Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
WIT Wipro Ltd
$2.08 +26.1% 1M -22.7% 1Y
Market cap
$21.27B
P/E
15.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.37B
Div. yield
–
IT Services Technology
5 wins
INGM Ingram Micro Holding Corp
$28.49 +5.6% 1M +31.1% 1Y
Market cap
$6.72B
P/E
15.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$55.98B
Div. yield
0.01%
Technology Distribution Technology
3 wins
GLOB Globant S.A.
$44.99 +30.4% 1M -24.7% 1Y
Market cap
$1.89B
P/E
16.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.45B
Div. yield
–
IT Services Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Wipro leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Wipro 5, Globant 3, Ingram Micro Holding 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionWITINGMGLOBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $21.27B $6.72B $1.89B WIT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 15.1x 15.6x 16.7x WIT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.9x 8.8x 7.9x GLOB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -0.4% +11.5% -1.3% INGM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 13.6% 0.8% 4.6% WIT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 16.6% 8.2% 8.1% WIT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.4x 2.5x -0.2x GLOB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -22.7% +31.1% -24.7% INGM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -14.6%/yr — -32.0%/yr WIT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 46.7% 44.1% 60.5% INGM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 50/100 49/100 69/100 GLOB

Percentile Scorecard

WITINGMGLOB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisWITINGMGLOB
Valuation 39 #31 of 50 63 #19 of 50 94 #4 of 50
Growth 14 #39 of 45 86 #7 of 45 41 #27 of 45
Profitability 93 #4 of 41 30 #29 of 41 65 #15 of 41
Financial Health 56 #28 of 62 28 #45 of 62 75 #16 of 62
Shareholder Returns 52 #15 of 30 38 #19 of 30 –
Overall 50 49 69
  • WIT ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services
  • INGM ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services
  • GLOB ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodWITINGMGLOBSPY
1 month +26.1%+5.6%+30.4% -0.8%
3 months +8.3%-2.2%+37.9% +3.5%
6 months +1.5%-5.6%+6.1% +7.0%
Year to date -26.8%+33.5%-31.2% +12.2%
1 year -22.7%+31.1%-24.7% +13.0%
3 years -7.8%—-73.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year -2.7%—-35.7% +23.1%
5 years -54.6%—-85.4% +68.6%
5 years, per year -14.6%—-32.0% +11.0%
10 years +15.8%—-1.1% +258.0%
10 years, per year +1.5%—-0.1% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureWITINGMGLOBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 46.7%44.1%60.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 47.2%46.8%62.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.441.250.74 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.490.71-0.41 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -66.8%-40.8%-92.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -32.0%-10.0%-36.8% -1.8%
52-week high $3.06$31.64$71.21 $779.14
52-week low $1.62$19.51$27.73 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleWITINGMGLOB
P/E now vs peer median 15.5xmedian 17.9x 15.3xmedian 17.9x 17.5xmedian 17.9x
P/S now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 0.7x 0.1xmedian 0.7x 0.8xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.1xmedian 11.0x 8.1xmedian 11.0x 8.2xmedian 11.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 13.9xmedian 12.1x -29.0xmedian 12.1x 4.6xmedian 12.1x
P/B now vs peer median 2.6xmedian 1.4x 1.6xmedian 1.4x 0.9xmedian 1.4x
PEG now vs peer median 11.60median 1.49 —median 1.49 -1.74median 1.49

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsWITINGMGLOB
Revenue $10.37B $55.98B $2.45B
Gross profit $3.00B $3.72B $846.14M
Operating income $1.68B $992.13M $187.55M
Net income $1.43B $430.60M $119.56M
Free cash flow $1.57B -$231.59M $427.56M
EPS (diluted) $0.13 $1.85 $2.52
Cash & equivalents $992.00M $808.97M $163.77M
Total debt $7.07B $3.80B $903.43M
Shares (diluted) 10.50B 232.23M 45.01M
Enterprise value $16.41B $2.33B $1.10B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricWITINGMGLOB
P/E 15.5x 15.3x 17.5x
P/FCF 13.9x -29.0x 4.6x
P/Operating cash flow 12.6x -69.4x 5.7x
P/S 2.1x 0.1x 0.8x
P/B 2.6x 1.6x 0.9x
P/Tangible book 2.8x 1.9x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA 11.1x 8.1x 8.2x
EV/EBIT 13.4x 9.8x 10.2x
EV/Revenue 2.2x 0.2x 0.8x
EV/FCF 14.4x -41.9x 4.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.1x -100.4x 5.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 11.60 – -1.74

Growth

14 metrics
MetricWITINGMGLOB
Revenue growth (1Y) -0.4% 11.5% -1.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.4% – 8.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -4.6% 7.9% -4.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -3.1% – 6.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) -4.6% 22.4% 4.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -36.3% – -1.8%
Net income growth (1Y) -9.5% 61.2% 6.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 0.1% – -7.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -10.4% 63.1% 1.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 1.3% – -10.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -8.4% 79.3% 31.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -3.2% – 12.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -9.1% 61.7% 16.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -8.2% – 6.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricWITINGMGLOB
Gross margin 28.9% 6.6% 34.5%
EBITDA margin 19.6% 2.1% 9.5%
Operating margin 16.2% 1.8% 7.7%
Pretax margin 17.9% 1.2% 6.5%
Net margin 13.6% 0.8% 4.6%
FCF margin 15.2% -0.4% 17.4%
Operating cash flow margin 16.7% -0.2% 14.2%
Return on equity 17.1% 10.2% 9.2%
Return on assets 10.1% 2.0% 6.1%
Return on invested capital 16.6% 8.2% 8.1%
Return on capital employed 17.6% 14.0% 6.8%
Asset turnover 0.7x 2.6x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x -0.2x 2.9x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 0.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricWITINGMGLOB
Debt / assets 13.6% 17.6% 3.6%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.9x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.4x 2.5x -0.2x
Debt / FCF 1.2x -16.4x 0.3x
Liabilities / assets 41.4% 80.1% 32.7%
Equity / assets 58.6% 19.9% 67.3%
Interest coverage 8.4x 3.3x 4.9x
Current ratio 1.7x 1.3x 1.8x
Quick ratio 0.6x 0.8x 1.8x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.1x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 4.27 3.34 2.66

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricWITINGMGLOB
Dividend yield 4.3% 1.2% –
Net buyback yield 0.0% 1.6% –
Shareholder yield 4.3% 2.7% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – 17.6% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – -32.8% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 85.9% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusWITINGMGLOB
Forward P/E 14.9xFY2026 8.8xFY2026 7.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.14FY2026 $3.25FY2026 $5.67FY2026
EPS growth, next FY 0.0%FY2026 +12.1%FY2026 -7.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -7.1% +10.2% +13.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $10.90BFY2026 $55.78BFY2026 $2.36BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +9.3%FY2026 +6.1%FY2026 -3.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.3% +3.1% +1.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersWITINGMGLOB
Held by institutions 3.1% 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 297 228 291
Change in shares held, QoQ -3.4% +1.0% +26.5%
Institutions buying 175 165 186
Institutions selling 93 44 71
Buyers to sellers 1.88 3.75 2.62

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

WITINGMGLOB
WIT 1.00 0.02 0.34
INGM 0.02 1.00 0.20
GLOB 0.34 0.20 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, WIT, INGM and GLOB?

Wipro (WIT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Wipro (WIT) $21.27B, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) $6.72B, Globant (GLOB) $1.89B.

Which stock is cheaper, WIT, INGM and GLOB?

Wipro (WIT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Wipro (WIT) 15.1x, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 15.6x, Globant (GLOB) 16.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Globant (GLOB) is cheapest (Wipro (WIT) 14.9x, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 8.8x, Globant (GLOB) 7.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Wipro (WIT) -0.4%, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) +11.5%, Globant (GLOB) -1.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Wipro (WIT) has the highest net margin (Wipro (WIT) 13.6%, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 0.8%, Globant (GLOB) 4.6%). On return on invested capital, Wipro (WIT) leads (Wipro (WIT) 16.6%, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 8.2%, Globant (GLOB) 8.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) returned the most: Wipro (WIT) -22.7%, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) +31.1%, Globant (GLOB) -24.7%. Over five years, Wipro (WIT) compounded fastest (Wipro (WIT) -14.6%/yr, Globant (GLOB) -32.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Wipro (WIT) 0.00%, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 0.01%, Globant (GLOB) 0.00%. Wipro (WIT) and Globant (GLOB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) has been the steadiest (Wipro (WIT) 46.7%, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 44.1%, Globant (GLOB) 60.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, WIT, INGM and GLOB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Wipro (WIT) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.