WIT vs ARW vs EPAM Stock Comparison

Wipro, Arrow Electronics and EPAM Systems Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
WIT Wipro Ltd
$2.08 +26.1% 1M -22.7% 1Y
Market cap
$21.32B
P/E
15.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.37B
Div. yield
–
IT Services Technology
3 wins
ARW Arrow Electronics, Inc.
$214.35 -7.9% 1M +78.7% 1Y
Market cap
$11.17B
P/E
13.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$35.92B
Div. yield
–
Technology Distribution Technology
6 wins
EPAM EPAM Systems, Inc.
$137.43 +27.0% 1M -13.8% 1Y
Market cap
$6.93B
P/E
17.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.62B
Div. yield
–
IT Services Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Arrow Electronics leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Arrow Electronics 6, Wipro 3, EPAM Systems 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionWITARWEPAMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $21.32B $11.17B $6.93B WIT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 15.1x 13.8x 17.3x ARW
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.9x 9.3x 10.0x ARW
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -0.4% +26.1% +10.8% ARW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 13.6% 2.3% 7.2% WIT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 16.6% 10.2% 11.5% WIT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.4x 1.4x -1.1x EPAM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -22.7% +78.7% -13.8% ARW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -14.6%/yr +13.7%/yr -26.8%/yr ARW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 46.7% 37.5% 53.6% ARW
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 50/100 52/100 71/100 EPAM

Percentile Scorecard

WITARWEPAM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisWITARWEPAM
Valuation 39 #31 of 50 76 #13 of 50 55 #23 of 50
Growth 14 #39 of 45 77 #11 of 45 43 #26 of 45
Profitability 93 #4 of 41 43 #24 of 41 80 #9 of 41
Financial Health 56 #28 of 62 31 #43 of 62 89 #8 of 62
Shareholder Returns 52 #15 of 30 35 #20 of 30 90 #4 of 30
Overall 50 52 71
  • WIT ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services
  • ARW ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services
  • EPAM ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodWITARWEPAMSPY
1 month +26.1%-7.9%+27.0% -0.8%
3 months +8.3%+0.5%+45.8% +3.5%
6 months +1.5%+14.9%+18.2% +7.0%
Year to date -26.8%+94.5%-32.9% +12.2%
1 year -22.7%+78.7%-13.8% +13.0%
3 years -7.8%+91.7%-34.7% +86.3%
3 years, per year -2.7%+24.2%-13.2% +23.1%
5 years -54.6%+90.1%-78.9% +68.6%
5 years, per year -14.6%+13.7%-26.8% +11.0%
10 years +15.8%+243.6%+107.1% +258.0%
10 years, per year +1.5%+13.1%+7.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureWITARWEPAMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 46.7%37.5%53.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 47.2%34.8%60.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.441.470.42 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.492.10-0.26 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -66.8%-38.2%-89.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -32.0%-11.5%-37.9% -1.8%
52-week high $3.06$242.14$221.40 $779.14
52-week low $1.62$101.87$76.04 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleWITARWEPAM
P/E now vs peer median 15.5xmedian 17.9x 13.6xmedian 17.9x 17.9xmedian 17.9x
P/S now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 0.7x 0.3xmedian 0.7x 1.3xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.1xmedian 11.0x 9.5xmedian 11.0x 9.2xmedian 11.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 13.9xmedian 12.1x 13.2xmedian 12.1x 14.7xmedian 12.1x
P/B now vs peer median 2.6xmedian 1.4x 1.5xmedian 1.4x 2.0xmedian 1.4x
PEG now vs peer median 11.60median 1.49 -1.46median 1.49 -3.45median 1.49

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsWITARWEPAM
Revenue $10.37B $35.92B $5.62B
Gross profit $3.00B $4.06B $1.65B
Operating income $1.68B $1.21B $563.19M
Net income $1.43B $811.67M $401.67M
Free cash flow $1.57B $825.46M $482.64M
EPS (diluted) $0.13 $15.65 $7.68
Cash & equivalents $992.00M $244.63M $789.40M
Total debt $7.07B $10.85B $25.00M
Shares (diluted) 10.50B 51.87M 52.27M
Enterprise value $16.46B $10.12B $2.57B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricWITARWEPAM
P/E 15.5x 13.6x 17.9x
P/FCF 13.9x 13.2x 14.7x
P/Operating cash flow 12.6x 11.7x 13.2x
P/S 2.1x 0.3x 1.3x
P/B 2.6x 1.5x 2.0x
P/Tangible book 2.8x 1.6x 2.3x
EV/EBITDA 11.1x 9.5x 9.2x
EV/EBIT 13.4x 10.6x 11.2x
EV/Revenue 2.2x 0.4x 1.1x
EV/FCF 14.4x 15.6x 13.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.1x 13.7x 11.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 11.60 -1.46 -3.45

Growth

14 metrics
MetricWITARWEPAM
Revenue growth (1Y) -0.4% 26.1% 10.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.4% 0.1% 5.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -4.6% 26.4% 8.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -3.1% -3.9% 2.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) -4.6% 68.5% 4.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -36.3% -13.0% -2.9%
Net income growth (1Y) -9.5% 73.6% 0.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 0.1% -12.5% -9.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -10.4% 75.3% 8.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 1.3% -9.3% -5.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -8.4% 69.4% 19.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -3.2% 39.3% -4.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -9.1% 76.3% 17.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -8.2% 45.7% -4.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricWITARWEPAM
Gross margin 28.9% 11.3% 29.4%
EBITDA margin 19.6% 3.8% 12.3%
Operating margin 16.2% 3.4% 10.0%
Pretax margin 17.9% 2.9% 9.8%
Net margin 13.6% 2.3% 7.2%
FCF margin 15.2% 2.3% 8.6%
Operating cash flow margin 16.7% 2.6% 9.6%
Return on equity 17.1% 11.7% 11.6%
Return on assets 10.1% 2.2% 8.7%
Return on invested capital 16.6% 10.2% 11.5%
Return on capital employed 17.6% 14.4% 14.7%
Asset turnover 0.7x 1.0x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 1.2x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 0.1% 3.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricWITARWEPAM
Debt / assets 13.6% 5.7% 0.5%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.3x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.4x 1.4x -1.1x
Debt / FCF 1.2x 2.6x 0.1x
Liabilities / assets 41.4% 81.6% 23.1%
Equity / assets 58.6% 18.4% 76.9%
Interest coverage 8.4x – –
Current ratio 1.7x 1.2x 2.8x
Quick ratio 0.6x 1.0x 2.6x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.0x 1.0x
Altman Z-score 4.27 1.70 6.66

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricWITARWEPAM
Dividend yield 4.3% – –
Net buyback yield 0.0% 1.1% 9.6%
Shareholder yield 4.3% 1.1% 9.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusWITARWEPAM
Forward P/E 14.9xFY2026 9.3xFY2026 10.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.14FY2026 $23.06FY2026 $13.81FY2026
EPS growth, next FY 0.0%FY2026 +109.3%FY2026 +20.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -7.1% +9.8% +8.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $10.90BFY2026 $41.84BFY2026 $6.04BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +9.3%FY2026 +35.6%FY2026 +10.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.3% -3.8% +0.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersWITARWEPAM
Held by institutions 3.1% 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 297 632 438
Change in shares held, QoQ -3.4% -2.6% +0.7%
Institutions buying 175 359 232
Institutions selling 93 195 160
Buyers to sellers 1.88 1.84 1.45

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

WITARWEPAM
WIT 1.00 -0.08 0.30
ARW -0.08 1.00 -0.16
EPAM 0.30 -0.16 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, WIT, ARW and EPAM?

Wipro (WIT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Wipro (WIT) $21.32B, Arrow Electronics (ARW) $11.17B, EPAM Systems (EPAM) $6.93B.

Which stock is cheaper, WIT, ARW and EPAM?

Arrow Electronics (ARW) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Wipro (WIT) 15.1x, Arrow Electronics (ARW) 13.8x, EPAM Systems (EPAM) 17.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Arrow Electronics (ARW) is cheapest (Wipro (WIT) 14.9x, Arrow Electronics (ARW) 9.3x, EPAM Systems (EPAM) 10.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Arrow Electronics (ARW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Wipro (WIT) -0.4%, Arrow Electronics (ARW) +26.1%, EPAM Systems (EPAM) +10.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Wipro (WIT) has the highest net margin (Wipro (WIT) 13.6%, Arrow Electronics (ARW) 2.3%, EPAM Systems (EPAM) 7.2%). On return on invested capital, Wipro (WIT) leads (Wipro (WIT) 16.6%, Arrow Electronics (ARW) 10.2%, EPAM Systems (EPAM) 11.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Arrow Electronics (ARW) returned the most: Wipro (WIT) -22.7%, Arrow Electronics (ARW) +78.7%, EPAM Systems (EPAM) -13.8%. Over five years, Arrow Electronics (ARW) compounded fastest (Wipro (WIT) -14.6%/yr, Arrow Electronics (ARW) +13.7%/yr, EPAM Systems (EPAM) -26.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Arrow Electronics (ARW) has been the steadiest (Wipro (WIT) 46.7%, Arrow Electronics (ARW) 37.5%, EPAM Systems (EPAM) 53.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, WIT, ARW and EPAM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Arrow Electronics (ARW) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.