WILCF vs NOMD vs HGYN Stock Comparison

G Willi Food International, Nomad Foods and Hong Yuan Holding Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
NOMD Nomad Foods Ltd
$11.78 +10.6% 1M +0.3% 1Y
Market cap
$1.77B
P/E
12.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.46B
Div. yield
0.06%
Packaged Foods Consumer Staples
3 wins
HGYN Hong Yuan Holding Group
$0.04 -20.0% 1M +33.3% 1Y
Market cap
$2.99M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$559.73K
Div. yield
–
Food Distribution Consumer Staples
1 win

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

G Willi Food International leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (G Willi Food International 4, Nomad Foods 3, Hong Yuan Holding 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionWILCFNOMDHGYNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $338.62M $1.77B $2.99M NOMD
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 13.6x 12.2x -29.9x NOMD
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 7.1x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.7% +3.6% +6.1% WILCF
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 12.7% 4.2% -17.9% WILCF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 6.2% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 4.8x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.06% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +12.5% +0.3% +33.3% HGYN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +2.5%/yr -15.4%/yr -27.5%/yr WILCF
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 43.1% 32.5% 345.9% NOMD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 89/100 64/100 11/100 WILCF

Percentile Scorecard

WILCFNOMDHGYN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisWILCFNOMDHGYN
Valuation 77 #10 of 40 91 #5 of 45 3 #39 of 40
Growth 89 #5 of 38 39 #26 of 42 24 #29 of 38
Profitability 91 #4 of 36 67 #14 of 40 11 #32 of 36
Financial Health 100 #1 of 40 50 #24 of 47 5 #38 of 40
Shareholder Returns – 73 #9 of 31 –
Overall 89 64 11
  • WILCF ranked among 41 companies in Staples Retail
  • NOMD ranked among 48 companies in Branded Foods
  • HGYN ranked among 41 companies in Staples Retail

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodWILCFNOMDHGYNSPY
1 month -7.6%+10.6%-20.0% +0.9%
3 months -8.8%-7.2%+33.3% +5.9%
6 months -23.5%+23.1%-60.0% +8.5%
Year to date -17.1%-5.8%0.0% +13.3%
1 year +12.5%+0.3%+33.3% +12.4%
3 years +176.4%-13.4%+100.0% +88.1%
3 years, per year +40.4%-4.7%+26.0% +23.5%
5 years +13.4%-56.7%-80.0% +68.2%
5 years, per year +2.5%-15.4%-27.5% +11.0%
10 years +332.1%-4.2%— +263.4%
10 years, per year +15.8%-0.4%— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureWILCFNOMDHGYNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 43.1%32.5%345.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 42.5%31.5%534.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.90-0.030.60 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.290.010.10 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -63.1%-67.4%-95.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -35.4%-9.7%-73.3% -0.9%
52-week high $36.90$13.04$0.15 $779.14
52-week low $20.87$9.09$0.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleWILCFNOMDHGYN
P/E now vs peer median 13.3xmedian 21.7x 12.2xmedian 22.2x -29.9xmedian 21.7x
P/S now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 0.5x 0.5xmedian 0.7x 5.3xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.5xmedian 9.3x 8.2xmedian 12.2x -33.8xmedian 9.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 10.8xmedian 17.1x 5.7xmedian 13.4x -78.9xmedian 17.1x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 2.9x 0.6xmedian 1.6x -13.0xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 0.30median 1.02 -1.14median 0.56 1.29median 1.02

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsWILCFNOMDHGYN
Revenue $195.48M $3.46B $559.73K
Gross profit $59.43M $930.71M $370.82K
Operating income $35.99M $360.86M -$91.58K
Net income $24.91M $145.09M -$99.38K
Free cash flow $30.77M $292.81M -$37.82K
EPS (diluted) $1.79 $0.89 $0.00
Cash & equivalents $46.35M $312.28M $13.37K
Total debt – $10.21B –
Shares (diluted) 13.91M 162.22M 74.64M
Enterprise value $175.62M $523.61M $3.02M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricWILCFNOMDHGYN
P/E 13.3x 12.2x -29.9x
P/FCF 10.8x 5.7x -78.9x
P/Operating cash flow 9.8x 4.4x -78.9x
P/S 1.7x 0.5x 5.3x
P/B 1.5x 0.6x -13.0x
P/Tangible book 1.5x 26.1x -12.3x
EV/EBITDA 7.5x 8.2x -33.8x
EV/EBIT 7.9x 11.1x -32.5x
EV/Revenue 1.5x 1.2x 5.3x
EV/FCF 9.3x 13.7x -78.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 8.4x 10.4x -78.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.30 -1.14 1.29

Growth

14 metrics
MetricWILCFNOMDHGYN
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.7% 3.6% 6.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.0% 2.9% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.6% -4.1% 26.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 15.6% 1.5% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 17.8% -11.7% -268.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 52.6% -0.5% -19.6%
Net income growth (1Y) -14.1% -37.2% -2,581%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 44.7% -12.7% -22.9%
EPS growth (1Y) -14.4% -37.2% -362.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 44.5% -10.6% -23.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 19,203% -20.0% 24.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 76.3% -0.8% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 3,275% -26.3% 24.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 64.1% -1.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricWILCFNOMDHGYN
Gross margin 30.4% 26.9% 66.2%
EBITDA margin 19.4% 14.1% -15.7%
Operating margin 18.4% 10.4% -16.4%
Pretax margin 16.5% 4.4% -16.4%
Net margin 12.7% 4.2% -17.9%
FCF margin 15.7% 8.5% -6.8%
Operating cash flow margin 17.4% 11.1% -6.8%
Return on equity 11.5% 5.1% –
Return on assets – 2.0% -16.4%
Return on invested capital – 6.2% –
Return on capital employed – 6.0% –
Asset turnover – 0.5x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x 2.7x 0.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.4% 0.0% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricWILCFNOMDHGYN
Debt / assets – 36.2% –
Debt / equity – 0.9x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 4.8x –
Debt / FCF – 9.0x –
Liabilities / assets – 60.5% 136.2%
Equity / assets – 39.5% -36.2%
Interest coverage 40.8x 1.6x –
Current ratio 9.7x 1.1x 0.8x
Quick ratio 5.6x 0.6x 0.5x
Cash ratio 2.3x 0.3x 0.0x
Altman Z-score – 1.17 -214.31

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricWILCFNOMDHGYN
Dividend yield – 5.8% –
Net buyback yield – 8.3% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 14.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – 67.4% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 33.4% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – -2.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusWILCFNOMDHGYN
Forward P/E – 7.1xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $1.65FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – -15.4%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – -4.2% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $3.24BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – -9.0%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +1.5% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersWILCFNOMDHGYN
Held by institutions – 57.7% –
Institutions holding – 187 –
Change in shares held, QoQ – -2.1% –
Institutions buying – 99 –
Institutions selling – 70 –
Buyers to sellers – 1.41 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

WILCFNOMDHGYN
WILCF 1.00 -0.01 -0.05
NOMD -0.01 1.00 0.03
HGYN -0.05 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, WILCF, NOMD and HGYN?

Nomad Foods (NOMD) is the largest by market capitalisation: G Willi Food International (WILCF) $338.62M, Nomad Foods (NOMD) $1.77B, Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) $2.99M.

Which stock is cheaper, WILCF, NOMD and HGYN?

Nomad Foods (NOMD) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (G Willi Food International (WILCF) 13.6x, Nomad Foods (NOMD) 12.2x, Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) -29.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

G Willi Food International (WILCF) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: G Willi Food International (WILCF) +10.7%, Nomad Foods (NOMD) +3.6%, Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) +6.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

G Willi Food International (WILCF) has the highest net margin (G Willi Food International (WILCF) 12.7%, Nomad Foods (NOMD) 4.2%, Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) -17.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) returned the most: G Willi Food International (WILCF) +12.5%, Nomad Foods (NOMD) +0.3%, Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) +33.3%. Over five years, G Willi Food International (WILCF) compounded fastest (G Willi Food International (WILCF) +2.5%/yr, Nomad Foods (NOMD) -15.4%/yr, Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) -27.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: G Willi Food International (WILCF) 0.00%, Nomad Foods (NOMD) 0.06%. G Willi Food International (WILCF) and Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Nomad Foods (NOMD) has been the steadiest (G Willi Food International (WILCF) 43.1%, Nomad Foods (NOMD) 32.5%, Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) 345.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, WILCF, NOMD and HGYN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, G Willi Food International (WILCF) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.