WFG vs SUZ Stock Comparison

West Fraser Timber and Suzano Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SUZ Suzano S.A.
$8.81 +1.4% 1M -3.4% 1Y
Market cap
$11.03B
P/E
7.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.04B
Div. yield
–
Pulp and Paper Basic Materials
6 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Suzano leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Suzano 6, West Fraser Timber 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionWFGSUZLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.45B $11.03B SUZ
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -4.0x 7.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 6.2x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -10.2% +0.7% SUZ
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -26.2% 17.2% SUZ
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 7.1% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -181.5x 3.1x WFG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +6.5% -3.4% WFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.9%/yr +0.2%/yr SUZ
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 33.7% 29.9% SUZ
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 33/100 57/100 SUZ

Percentile Scorecard

WFGSUZ

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisWFGSUZ
Valuation 44 #161 of 287 90 #30 of 287
Growth 5 #253 of 267 17 #223 of 267
Profitability 21 #190 of 239 76 #59 of 239
Financial Health – 30 #204 of 292
Shareholder Returns 61 #80 of 204 71 #60 of 204
Overall 33 57
  • WFG ranked among 308 companies in Basic Materials
  • SUZ ranked among 308 companies in Basic Materials

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodWFGSUZSPY
1 month -2.4%+1.4% -0.8%
3 months +5.7%+7.0% +3.5%
6 months +6.0%-3.2% +7.0%
Year to date +14.4%-5.7% +12.2%
1 year +6.5%-3.4% +13.0%
3 years +6.6%-15.1% +86.3%
3 years, per year +2.1%-5.3% +23.1%
5 years -13.9%+0.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year -2.9%+0.2% +11.0%
10 years +111.9%+149.6% +258.0%
10 years, per year +7.8%+9.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureWFGSUZSPY
Volatility, 1Y 33.7%29.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 32.6%27.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.640.64 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.19-0.11 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -43.2%-41.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -8.8%-23.1% -1.8%
52-week high $76.69$11.46 $779.14
52-week low $57.91$7.67 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleWFGSUZ
P/E now vs peer median -4.0xmedian 17.8x 7.0xmedian 17.8x
P/S now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.8x 1.2xmedian 1.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -2,943xmedian 9.9x 5.8xmedian 9.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median -12.7xmedian 16.0x 12.5xmedian 16.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 1.8x 1.2xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 0.62median 0.79 -0.19median 0.79

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsWFGSUZ
Revenue $5.24B $9.04B
Gross profit $1.14B $2.58B
Operating income -$1.49B $1.91B
Net income -$1.20B $1.56B
Free cash flow -$435.00M $888.28M
EPS (diluted) $-17.33 $1.25
Cash & equivalents $74.00M $3.21B
Total debt $437.00M $17.89B
Shares (diluted) 79.16M 1.24B
Enterprise value $4.55B -$7.31B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricWFGSUZ
P/E -4.0x 7.0x
P/FCF -12.7x 12.5x
P/Operating cash flow – 3.5x
P/S 1.1x 1.2x
P/B 1.0x 1.2x
P/Tangible book 1.0x 1.2x
EV/EBITDA -2,943x 5.8x
EV/EBIT -4.0x 12.6x
EV/Revenue 1.1x 2.7x
EV/FCF -13.5x 27.0x
EV/Operating cash flow – 7.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.62 -0.19

Growth

14 metrics
MetricWFGSUZ
Revenue growth (1Y) -10.2% 0.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -13.9% -1.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -29.4% -23.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -27.6% -17.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) -867.5% -20.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -52.1% -30.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -1,620% 11.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -188.8% -29.7%
EPS growth (1Y) -331.3% 14.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -6.5% -36.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -11.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -13.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 17.8% -70.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.3% -47.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricWFGSUZ
Gross margin 21.8% 28.6%
EBITDA margin 0.0% 46.0%
Operating margin -28.4% 21.1%
Pretax margin -29.3% 25.9%
Net margin -26.2% 17.2%
FCF margin -8.3% 9.8%
Operating cash flow margin – 34.8%
Return on equity -24.5% 16.6%
Return on assets – 4.8%
Return on invested capital – 7.1%
Return on capital employed – 6.4%
Asset turnover – 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.0x
Stock comp / revenue – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricWFGSUZ
Debt / assets – 54.2%
Debt / equity 0.1x 1.9x
Net debt / EBITDA -181.5x 3.1x
Debt / FCF -1.0x 20.1x
Liabilities / assets – 70.9%
Equity / assets – 29.1%
Interest coverage – 1.4x
Current ratio – 3.4x
Quick ratio – 2.3x
Cash ratio – 1.9x
Altman Z-score – 1.03

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricWFGSUZ
Dividend yield 1.8% 2.4%
Net buyback yield – –
Shareholder yield 1.8% 2.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusWFGSUZ
Forward P/E – 6.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-4.07FY2026 $1.43FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -31.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -29.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.84BFY2026 $10.39BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +6.9%FY2026 +7.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +9.6% +11.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersWFGSUZ
Held by institutions 49.7% 5.9%
Institutions holding 166 136
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.1% +0.6%
Institutions buying 79 77
Institutions selling 55 46
Buyers to sellers 1.44 1.67

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

WFGSUZ
WFG 1.00 0.27
SUZ 0.27 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, WFG and SUZ?

Suzano (SUZ) is the largest by market capitalisation: West Fraser Timber (WFG) $5.45B, Suzano (SUZ) $11.03B.

Which company is growing faster?

Suzano (SUZ) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: West Fraser Timber (WFG) -10.2%, Suzano (SUZ) +0.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Suzano (SUZ) has the highest net margin (West Fraser Timber (WFG) -26.2%, Suzano (SUZ) 17.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year West Fraser Timber (WFG) returned the most: West Fraser Timber (WFG) +6.5%, Suzano (SUZ) -3.4%. Over five years, Suzano (SUZ) compounded fastest (West Fraser Timber (WFG) -2.9%/yr, Suzano (SUZ) +0.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Suzano (SUZ) has been the steadiest (West Fraser Timber (WFG) 33.7%, Suzano (SUZ) 29.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do WFG and SUZ move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.27, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, WFG and SUZ?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Suzano (SUZ) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.