WFG vs SLVM Stock Comparison

West Fraser Timber and Sylvamo Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SLVM Sylvamo Corp
$32.64 -9.2% 1M -23.9% 1Y
Market cap
$1.30B
P/E
17.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.30B
Div. yield
5.51%
Pulp and Paper Basic Materials
5 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Sylvamo leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Sylvamo 5, West Fraser Timber 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionWFGSLVMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.52B $1.30B WFG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -4.0x 17.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 26.8x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -10.2% -7.1% SLVM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -26.2% 2.3% SLVM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 7.4% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -181.5x 1.9x WFG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.83% 5.51% SLVM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +6.5% -23.9% WFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.9%/yr +3.5%/yr SLVM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 33.7% 38.4% WFG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 38/100 57/100 SLVM

Percentile Scorecard

WFGSLVM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisWFGSLVM
Valuation 53 #76 of 160 89 #19 of 160
Growth 7 #134 of 144 11 #128 of 144
Profitability 28 #88 of 121 65 #43 of 121
Financial Health – 24 #129 of 169
Shareholder Returns 65 #38 of 106 96 #5 of 106
Overall 38 57
  • WFG ranked among 180 companies in Basic Materials
  • SLVM ranked among 180 companies in Basic Materials

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodWFGSLVMSPY
1 month -2.4%-9.2% -0.8%
3 months +5.7%-13.3% +3.5%
6 months +6.0%-24.1% +7.0%
Year to date +14.4%-32.2% +12.2%
1 year +6.5%-23.9% +13.0%
3 years +6.6%-24.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year +2.1%-9.1% +23.1%
5 years -13.9%+18.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year -2.9%+3.5% +11.0%
10 years +111.9%— +258.0%
10 years, per year +7.8%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureWFGSLVMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 33.7%38.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 32.6%35.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.640.62 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.19-0.62 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -43.2%-67.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -8.8%-40.4% -1.8%
52-week high $76.69$54.74 $779.14
52-week low $57.91$31.19 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleWFGSLVM
P/E now vs peer median -4.0xmedian 11.7x 17.1xmedian 11.7x
P/S now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 2.3x 0.4xmedian 2.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -2,943xmedian 6.6x 4.9xmedian 6.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median -12.7xmedian 11.9x -118.1xmedian 11.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 1.8x 1.4xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 0.62median 0.41 -0.49median 0.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsWFGSLVM
Revenue $5.24B $3.30B
Gross profit $1.14B $679.00M
Operating income -$1.49B $261.00M
Net income -$1.20B $76.00M
Free cash flow -$435.00M -$11.00M
EPS (diluted) $-17.33 $1.91
Cash & equivalents $74.00M $227.00M
Total debt $437.00M $3.55B
Shares (diluted) 79.16M 39.80M
Enterprise value $4.62B $1.18B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricWFGSLVM
P/E -4.0x 17.1x
P/FCF -12.7x -118.1x
P/Operating cash flow – 6.2x
P/S 1.1x 0.4x
P/B 1.0x 1.4x
P/Tangible book 1.0x 1.4x
EV/EBITDA -2,943x 4.9x
EV/EBIT -4.0x 8.2x
EV/Revenue 1.1x 0.6x
EV/FCF -13.5x -194.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – 10.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.62 -0.49

Growth

14 metrics
MetricWFGSLVM
Revenue growth (1Y) -10.2% -7.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -13.9% -4.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -29.4% -16.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -27.6% -12.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) -867.5% -32.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -52.1% -23.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -1,620% -65.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -188.8% -36.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -331.3% -64.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -6.5% -35.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -49.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -19.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 17.8% -105.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.3% -27.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricWFGSLVM
Gross margin 21.8% 20.6%
EBITDA margin 0.0% 13.3%
Operating margin -28.4% 7.9%
Pretax margin -29.3% 4.3%
Net margin -26.2% 2.3%
FCF margin -8.3% -0.3%
Operating cash flow margin – 6.3%
Return on equity -24.5% 7.9%
Return on assets – 2.7%
Return on invested capital – 7.4%
Return on capital employed – 12.4%
Asset turnover – 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.8x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricWFGSLVM
Debt / assets – 33.5%
Debt / equity 0.1x 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA -181.5x 1.9x
Debt / FCF -1.0x -87.6x
Liabilities / assets – 66.8%
Equity / assets – 33.2%
Interest coverage – –
Current ratio – 1.5x
Quick ratio – 0.7x
Cash ratio – 0.2x
Altman Z-score – 3.20

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricWFGSLVM
Dividend yield 1.8% 5.5%
Net buyback yield – 3.2%
Shareholder yield 1.8% 8.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusWFGSLVM
Forward P/E – 26.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-3.97FY2026 $1.22FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -65.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +323.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.84BFY2026 $3.41BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +6.9%FY2026 +1.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +9.9% +0.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersWFGSLVM
Held by institutions 49.7% 99.6%
Institutions holding 166 335
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.1% -0.4%
Institutions buying 79 162
Institutions selling 55 88
Buyers to sellers 1.44 1.84

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

WFGSLVM
WFG 1.00 0.44
SLVM 0.44 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry
WFG · Lumber

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, WFG and SLVM?

West Fraser Timber (WFG) is the largest by market capitalisation: West Fraser Timber (WFG) $5.52B, Sylvamo (SLVM) $1.30B.

Which company is growing faster?

Sylvamo (SLVM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: West Fraser Timber (WFG) -10.2%, Sylvamo (SLVM) -7.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Sylvamo (SLVM) has the highest net margin (West Fraser Timber (WFG) -26.2%, Sylvamo (SLVM) 2.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year West Fraser Timber (WFG) returned the most: West Fraser Timber (WFG) +6.5%, Sylvamo (SLVM) -23.9%. Over five years, Sylvamo (SLVM) compounded fastest (West Fraser Timber (WFG) -2.9%/yr, Sylvamo (SLVM) +3.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Sylvamo (SLVM) has the highest dividend yield: West Fraser Timber (WFG) 1.83%, Sylvamo (SLVM) 5.51%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, West Fraser Timber (WFG) has been the steadiest (West Fraser Timber (WFG) 33.7%, Sylvamo (SLVM) 38.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do WFG and SLVM move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.44, a moderate positive relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, WFG and SLVM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Sylvamo (SLVM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.