WEWA vs UTKN vs CNTN Stock Comparison

Wewards, Universal Token and Canton Strategic Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
WEWA Wewards, Inc.
$2.00 0.0% 1M -5.2% 1Y
Market cap
$214.97M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Blockchain Infrastructure Technology
2 wins
UTKN Universal Token
$1.70 -1.2% 1M -58.5% 1Y
Market cap
$172.65M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
-$1.45K
Div. yield
–
Blockchain Infrastructure Technology
1 win

Head to Head

4 decided of 12

Wewards leads on 2 of the 12 questions below (Wewards 2, Canton Strategic Holdings 1, Universal Token 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionWEWAUTKNCNTNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $214.97M $172.65M $441.32M CNTN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -599.4x -616.6x -4.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -5.2% -58.5% -38.2% WEWA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +131.8%/yr — — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 5.4% 184.2% 93.4% WEWA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 50/100 38/100 UTKN

Percentile Scorecard

WEWAUTKNCNTN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisWEWAUTKNCNTN
Valuation 41 #59 of 99 39 #61 of 99 37 #63 of 99
Growth 84 #16 of 94 57 #41 of 94 8 #87 of 94
Profitability – 35 #59 of 90 39 #55 of 90
Financial Health – 69 #33 of 105 97 #4 of 105
Shareholder Returns – – 12 #54 of 61
Overall – 50 38
  • WEWA ranked among 109 companies in Fintech
  • UTKN ranked among 109 companies in Fintech
  • CNTN ranked among 109 companies in Fintech

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodWEWAUTKNCNTNSPY
1 month 0.0%-1.2%-25.7% -0.2%
3 months 0.0%+26.9%-6.4% +3.9%
6 months 0.0%+9.7%-42.1% +8.2%
Year to date -5.2%-38.8%-37.0% +12.9%
1 year -5.2%-58.5%-38.2% +12.3%
3 years -1.0%—-97.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year -0.3%—-69.3% +23.3%
5 years +6,566.7%—— +67.9%
5 years, per year +131.8%—— +10.9%
10 years +9,900.0%—— +261.1%
10 years, per year +58.5%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureWEWAUTKNCNTNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 5.4%184.2%93.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y —410.1%98.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.010.621.91 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.97-0.32-0.41 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -9.1%-77.2%-99.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -5.2%-58.5%-65.1% -1.2%
52-week high $2.11$4.10$5.48 $779.14
52-week low $2.00$1.02$1.69 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleWEWAUTKNCNTN
P/E now vs peer median -599.4xmedian 20.0x -616.6xmedian 20.0x -4.2xmedian 20.0x
P/S now vs peer median —median 2.3x -119,401xmedian 2.3x 276.9xmedian 2.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 17.5x —median 17.5x —median 17.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -5,608xmedian 15.9x -621.4xmedian 15.9x -18.7xmedian 15.9x
P/B now vs peer median 2,866,225xmedian 2.0x 156.5xmedian 2.0x 0.9xmedian 2.0x
PEG now vs peer median -27.22median 1.03 —median 1.03 -0.48median 1.03

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsWEWAUTKNCNTN
Revenue – -$1.45K –
Operating income -$66.83K -$279.60K -$53.77M
Net income -$358.65K -$280.01K -$98.12M
Free cash flow -$38.34K -$277.85K -$22.17M
EPS (diluted) $0.00 $0.00 $-0.45
Cash & equivalents – $223.00 $37.24M
Shares (diluted) 107.48M 101.56M 216.86M
Enterprise value $214.97M $172.63M $342.93M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricWEWAUTKNCNTN
P/E -599.4x -616.6x -4.2x
P/FCF -5,608x -621.4x -18.7x
P/Operating cash flow -5,608x -621.4x -18.7x
P/S – -119,401x 276.9x
P/B 2,866,225x 156.5x 0.9x
P/Tangible book 2,866,225x 157.1x -6.1x
EV/EBITDA – – –
EV/EBIT -3,217x -617.7x -7.0x
EV/Revenue – -119,431x –
EV/FCF -5,608x -621.5x -17.0x
EV/Operating cash flow -5,608x -621.5x -17.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -27.22 – -0.48

Growth

14 metrics
MetricWEWAUTKNCNTN
Revenue growth (1Y) – – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 24.0% -17.7% -360.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 35.2% – -81.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 39.7% -12.9% -716.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 22.0% – -122.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 39.7% -12.4% 89.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 22.0% – 8.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 45.2% -3.9% -127.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 46.2% – -44.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 45.2% -3.9% -127.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 46.2% – -44.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricWEWAUTKNCNTN
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – – –
Net margin – – –
FCF margin – – –
Operating cash flow margin – 19,215% –
Return on equity – -25.2% -17.8%
Return on assets -191,282% -24.3% -14.3%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – -24.4% -9.4%
Asset turnover – 0.0x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.1x 1.0x 0.2x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricWEWAUTKNCNTN
Debt / assets – 3.8% –
Debt / equity – 0.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – -0.2x –
Liabilities / assets – 4.5% 19.4%
Equity / assets 100.0% 95.5% 80.6%
Interest coverage -0.2x – –
Current ratio – 0.9x 15.7x
Quick ratio – 0.0x 14.2x
Cash ratio – 0.0x 14.2x
Altman Z-score – 2,003 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricWEWAUTKNCNTN
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – -24.7%
Shareholder yield – – -24.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusWEWAUTKNCNTN
EPS, next fiscal year – – $-0.70FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year – – $0.00FY2024

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersWEWAUTKNCNTN
Held by institutions – – 9.3%
Institutions holding – – 68
Change in shares held, QoQ – – +70.5%
Institutions buying – – 60
Institutions selling – – 5
Buyers to sellers – – 12.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

WEWAUTKNCNTN
WEWA 1.00 0.00 0.03
UTKN 0.00 1.00 -0.06
CNTN 0.03 -0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, WEWA, UTKN and CNTN?

Canton Strategic Holdings (CNTN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Wewards (WEWA) $214.97M, Universal Token (UTKN) $172.65M, Canton Strategic Holdings (CNTN) $441.32M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Wewards (WEWA) returned the most: Wewards (WEWA) -5.2%, Universal Token (UTKN) -58.5%, Canton Strategic Holdings (CNTN) -38.2%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Wewards (WEWA) has been the steadiest (Wewards (WEWA) 5.4%, Universal Token (UTKN) 184.2%, Canton Strategic Holdings (CNTN) 93.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, WEWA, UTKN and CNTN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Wewards (WEWA) leads on 2. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.