WAB vs TRN vs LOMA Stock Comparison

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies, Trinity Industries and Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
TRN Trinity Industries Inc
$25.53 -7.6% 1M -9.6% 1Y
Market cap
$2.22B
P/E
6.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.04B
Div. yield
0.04%
Rail Equipment Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies 5, Trinity Industries 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionWABTRNLOMALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $47.97B $2.22B $1.07B WAB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 35.1x 6.5x 65.4x TRN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 24.3x 12.3x 17.9x TRN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +13.2% -18.9% — WAB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 16.6% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 8.8% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 4.8x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.04% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +42.6% -9.6% -12.6% WAB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +25.5%/yr -1.9%/yr +6.1%/yr WAB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 26.2% 35.3% 43.1% WAB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 60/100 — TRN

Percentile Scorecard

WABTRNLOMA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisWABTRNLOMA
Valuation 35 #132 of 203 79 #44 of 203 44 #6 of 10
Growth 89 #22 of 188 71 #56 of 188 –
Profitability 55 #84 of 184 64 #67 of 184 –
Financial Health 28 #156 of 217 4 #209 of 217 100 #1 of 9
Shareholder Returns 21 #121 of 153 86 #23 of 153 –
Overall 46 60 –
  • WAB ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • TRN ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • LOMA ranked among 10 companies in Construction Materials

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodWABTRNLOMASPY
1 month -3.5%-7.6%-2.3% +0.9%
3 months -3.2%-30.4%-21.6% +5.9%
6 months +8.0%-17.0%-16.1% +8.5%
Year to date +32.2%-3.4%-29.7% +13.3%
1 year +42.6%-9.6%-12.6% +12.4%
3 years +171.4%+25.8%+51.3% +88.1%
3 years, per year +39.5%+8.0%+14.8% +23.5%
5 years +211.1%-9.0%+34.4% +68.2%
5 years, per year +25.5%-1.9%+6.1% +11.0%
10 years +267.4%+68.7%— +263.4%
10 years, per year +13.9%+5.4%— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureWABTRNLOMASPY
Volatility, 1Y 26.2%35.3%43.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.2%35.6%36.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.990.541.16 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.63-0.27-0.29 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -23.7%-43.0%-48.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -7.7%-33.0%-30.6% -0.9%
52-week high $305.87$38.09$13.12 $779.14
52-week low $196.14$24.82$9.06 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleWABTRNLOMA
P/E now vs peer median 34.9xmedian 25.4x 6.0xmedian 25.4x 65.4xmedian 20.1x
P/S now vs peer median 3.9xmedian 1.9x 1.0xmedian 1.9x 1.8xmedian 1.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.3x 6.7xmedian 14.3x —median 9.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 28.7xmedian 21.8x -5.9xmedian 21.8x 614.6xmedian 31.4x
P/B now vs peer median 4.2xmedian 2.2x 1.8xmedian 2.2x 1.4xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 1.45median 1.41 0.09median 1.41 —median 2.86

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsWABTRNLOMA
Revenue $12.21B $2.04B –
Gross profit $4.35B $535.90M –
Operating income $2.10B $754.90M –
Net income – $353.30M –
Free cash flow – -$342.20M –
R&D $261.00M – –
EPS (diluted) $8.07 $4.16 –
Cash & equivalents $489.00M $155.70M –
Total debt – $5.23B $205.24M
Shares (diluted) 169.60M 81.60M 116.70M
Enterprise value $47.97B $1.67B $1.07B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricWABTRNLOMA
P/E 34.9x 6.0x 65.4x
P/FCF 28.7x -5.9x 614.6x
P/Operating cash flow 22.9x 5.1x –
P/S 3.9x 1.0x 1.8x
P/B 4.2x 1.8x 1.4x
P/Tangible book 6.5x 1.8x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA – 6.7x –
EV/EBIT – 9.4x –
EV/Revenue 3.9x 3.5x –
EV/FCF – -20.8x –
EV/Operating cash flow 22.9x 17.9x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.45 0.09 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricWABTRNLOMA
Revenue growth (1Y) 13.2% -18.9% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.9% -5.9% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 19.7% -10.7% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 15.4% 7.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 18.5% 75.7% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 20.3% 26.3% –
Net income growth (1Y) – 193.4% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 53.6% –
EPS growth (1Y) 17.0% 257.3% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 24.0% 64.1% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 40.1% -7.6% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 31.2% 25.6% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -48.5% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 23.1% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricWABTRNLOMA
Gross margin – 26.2% –
EBITDA margin – 52.1% –
Operating margin – 37.0% –
Pretax margin – 23.6% –
Net margin – 16.6% –
FCF margin – -16.8% –
Operating cash flow margin 17.1% 19.5% –
Return on equity 12.2% 30.8% –
Return on assets 5.9% 4.3% –
Return on invested capital – 8.8% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.2x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.1x –
Stock comp / revenue – 1.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricWABTRNLOMA
Debt / assets – 63.5% 15.7%
Debt / equity – 4.6x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – 4.8x –
Debt / FCF – -15.3x –
Liabilities / assets 50.9% 86.1% 43.8%
Equity / assets 49.1% 13.9% 56.2%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.1x – 1.4x
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricWABTRNLOMA
Dividend yield 0.4% 4.9% –
Net buyback yield – 2.6% –
Shareholder yield 0.4% 7.4% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 28.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – -28.9% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 2.5% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 6.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusWABTRNLOMA
Forward P/E 24.3xFY2026 12.3xFY2026 17.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $11.63FY2026 $2.08FY2026 $0.51FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +29.7%FY2026 -33.8%FY2026 +142.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +5.7% -1.9% +45.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $12.82BFY2026 $2.34BFY2026 $612.36MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +14.8%FY2026 +8.2%FY2026 +1.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -2.8% +4.3% +2.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersWABTRNLOMA
Held by institutions 92.6% 95.3% 17.5%
Institutions holding 1,195 343 58
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.2% +6.3% -6.6%
Institutions buying 553 171 26
Institutions selling 409 95 17
Buyers to sellers 1.35 1.80 1.53

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

WABTRNLOMA
WAB 1.00 0.36 0.25
TRN 0.36 1.00 0.10
LOMA 0.25 0.10 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, WAB, TRN and LOMA?

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies (WAB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies (WAB) $47.97B, Trinity Industries (TRN) $2.22B, Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima (LOMA) $1.07B.

Which stock is cheaper, WAB, TRN and LOMA?

Trinity Industries (TRN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies (WAB) 35.1x, Trinity Industries (TRN) 6.5x, Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima (LOMA) 65.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Trinity Industries (TRN) is cheapest (Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies (WAB) 24.3x, Trinity Industries (TRN) 12.3x, Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima (LOMA) 17.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies (WAB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies (WAB) +13.2%, Trinity Industries (TRN) -18.9%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies (WAB) returned the most: Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies (WAB) +42.6%, Trinity Industries (TRN) -9.6%, Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima (LOMA) -12.6%. Over five years, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies (WAB) compounded fastest (Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies (WAB) +25.5%/yr, Trinity Industries (TRN) -1.9%/yr, Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima (LOMA) +6.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies (WAB) 0.00%, Trinity Industries (TRN) 0.04%, Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima (LOMA) 0.00%. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies (WAB) and Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima (LOMA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies (WAB) has been the steadiest (Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies (WAB) 26.2%, Trinity Industries (TRN) 35.3%, Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima (LOMA) 43.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, WAB, TRN and LOMA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies (WAB) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.