VRSK vs MA vs TW Stock Comparison

Verisk Analytics, Mastercard and Tradeweb Markets Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc.
$195.88 +14.0% 1M -16.6% 1Y
Market cap
$25.66B
P/E
29.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.14B
Div. yield
–
Financial Data and Analytics Financial Services
2 wins
MA Mastercard Inc
$623.47 +11.3% 1M +8.7% 1Y
Market cap
$541.87B
P/E
33.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$35.08B
Div. yield
–
Payment Networks Financial Services
7 wins
TW Tradeweb Markets Inc.
$122.57 +22.3% 1M +10.7% 1Y
Market cap
$26.23B
P/E
29.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.21B
Div. yield
0.00%
Exchanges Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Mastercard leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Mastercard 7, Verisk Analytics 2, Tradeweb Markets 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionVRSKMATWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $25.66B $541.87B $26.23B MA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 29.0x 33.3x 29.2x VRSK
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 24.6x 29.7x 29.2x VRSK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.0% +16.0% +14.0% MA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 28.2% 46.3% 40.7% MA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 31.9% 59.0% — MA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.3x 0.6x — MA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -16.6% +8.7% +10.7% TW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -1.8%/yr +11.7%/yr +7.4%/yr MA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 37.2% 22.6% 30.8% MA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 55/100 51/100 77/100 TW

Percentile Scorecard

VRSKMATW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisVRSKMATW
Valuation 28 #682 of 945 13 #822 of 945 52 #47 of 97
Growth 47 #440 of 822 68 #268 of 822 74 #19 of 69
Profitability 97 #27 of 835 99 #11 of 835 97 #3 of 70
Financial Health 33 #604 of 905 49 #461 of 905 98 #3 of 101
Shareholder Returns 72 #201 of 726 28 #521 of 726 64 #15 of 40
Overall 55 51 77
  • VRSK ranked among 1,011 companies in Financial Services
  • MA ranked among 1,011 companies in Financial Services
  • TW ranked among 112 companies in Capital Markets

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodVRSKMATWSPY
1 month +14.0%+11.3%+22.3% -1.0%
3 months -2.7%+15.5%+22.8% +2.9%
6 months +10.3%+23.7%+8.2% +6.4%
Year to date -12.4%+9.2%+14.0% +11.4%
1 year -16.6%+8.7%+10.7% +13.1%
3 years -14.9%+61.1%+46.8% +79.4%
3 years, per year -5.2%+17.3%+13.7% +21.5%
5 years -8.5%+73.8%+43.0% +67.7%
5 years, per year -1.8%+11.7%+7.4% +10.9%
10 years +141.1%+506.2%— +255.2%
10 years, per year +9.2%+19.7%— +13.5%

Risk

MeasureVRSKMATWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 37.2%22.6%30.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 38.7%22.4%30.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.470.27-0.24 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.450.380.35 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -51.2%-28.6%-48.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -16.6%-1.5%-3.2% -2.5%
52-week high $234.94$632.81$126.57 $779.14
52-week low $156.84$471.55$91.50 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleVRSKMATW
P/E now vs peer median 28.9xmedian 13.4x 33.8xmedian 13.4x 29.0xmedian 29.4x
P/S now vs peer median 8.1xmedian 3.2x 15.5xmedian 3.2x 13.0xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.1xmedian 5.9x 23.1xmedian 5.9x 22.0xmedian 12.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 20.6xmedian 11.1x 32.5xmedian 11.1x 25.1xmedian 15.9x
P/B now vs peer median -21.4xmedian 1.2x 96.7xmedian 1.2x 3.9xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median 1.16median 0.89 1.73median 0.89 0.75median 0.51

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsVRSKMATW
Revenue $3.14B $35.08B $2.21B
Gross profit $2.20B – –
Operating income $1.38B $20.47B $963.90M
Net income $885.50M $16.26B $1.02B
Free cash flow $1.24B $16.70B $1.14B
EPS (diluted) $6.77 $18.41 $4.22
Cash & equivalents $551.40M $11.29B $2.06B
Total debt $11.77B $81.59B –
Shares (diluted) 130.85M 883.00M 212.80M
Enterprise value $20.30B $501.79B $18.24B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricVRSKMATW
P/E 28.9x 33.8x 29.0x
P/FCF 20.6x 32.5x 25.1x
P/Operating cash flow 17.0x 31.1x 24.0x
P/S 8.1x 15.5x 13.0x
P/B -21.4x 96.7x 3.9x
P/Tangible book -17.0x 3,744x 4.6x
EV/EBITDA 17.1x 23.1x 22.0x
EV/EBIT 21.4x 27.2x 27.6x
EV/Revenue 9.4x 15.9x 12.1x
EV/FCF 23.8x 33.3x 23.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 19.6x 31.9x 22.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.16 1.73 0.75

Growth

14 metrics
MetricVRSKMATW
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.0% 16.0% 14.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.9% 14.1% 21.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 6.2% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 8.3% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 4.8% 21.3% 28.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 6.6% 16.1% 30.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -3.3% 19.7% 60.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 20.7% 16.7% 38.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 3.7% 23.2% 62.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 25.0% 19.5% 39.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 21.1% 2.9% 14.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 11.4% 14.6% 19.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 21.2% 0.9% 13.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.6% 14.4% 19.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricVRSKMATW
Gross margin 70.2% – –
EBITDA margin 55.0% 68.6% 54.9%
Operating margin 43.9% 58.3% 43.7%
Pretax margin 37.0% 57.5% 58.9%
Net margin 28.2% 46.3% 40.7%
FCF margin 39.4% 47.6% 51.9%
Operating cash flow margin 47.9% 49.7% 54.2%
Return on equity – 263.6% 13.9%
Return on assets 19.5% 29.5% 12.3%
Return on invested capital 31.9% 59.0% –
Return on capital employed 40.1% 68.1% –
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.6x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x 1.1x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 1.8% 1.8% 5.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricVRSKMATW
Debt / assets 99.5% 42.7% –
Debt / equity -3.8x 4.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.3x 0.6x –
Debt / FCF 3.6x 1.5x –
Liabilities / assets 126.4% 90.3% 11.1%
Equity / assets -26.4% 9.7% 88.9%
Interest coverage 7.0x 27.4x 469.3x
Current ratio 1.0x 1.1x –
Quick ratio 0.9x 0.7x –
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.5x –
Altman Z-score 6.93 10.29 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricVRSKMATW
Dividend yield 1.0% 0.6% 0.4%
Net buyback yield 7.3% 2.9% 1.2%
Shareholder yield 8.3% 3.4% 1.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 10.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 9.7%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 18.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 15.9%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusVRSKMATW
Forward P/E 24.6xFY2026 29.7xFY2026 29.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $7.97FY2026 $20.99FY2026 $4.20FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +11.3%FY2026 +23.4%FY2026 +21.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +5.1% +14.7% +16.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.33BFY2026 $38.98BFY2026 $2.30BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +8.6%FY2026 +18.9%FY2026 +12.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +6.7% +0.4% +20.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersVRSKMATW
Held by institutions 97.6% 88.6% 49.9%
Institutions holding 953 3,581 561
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.4% +0.6% +0.3%
Institutions buying 487 1,587 300
Institutions selling 349 1,526 211
Buyers to sellers 1.40 1.04 1.42

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

VRSKMATW
VRSK 1.00 0.35 0.32
MA 0.35 1.00 0.29
TW 0.32 0.29 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, VRSK, MA and TW?

Mastercard (MA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Verisk Analytics (VRSK) $25.66B, Mastercard (MA) $541.87B, Tradeweb Markets (TW) $26.23B.

Which stock is cheaper, VRSK, MA and TW?

Verisk Analytics (VRSK) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Verisk Analytics (VRSK) 29.0x, Mastercard (MA) 33.3x, Tradeweb Markets (TW) 29.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) is cheapest (Verisk Analytics (VRSK) 24.6x, Mastercard (MA) 29.7x, Tradeweb Markets (TW) 29.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Mastercard (MA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Verisk Analytics (VRSK) +5.0%, Mastercard (MA) +16.0%, Tradeweb Markets (TW) +14.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Mastercard (MA) has the highest net margin (Verisk Analytics (VRSK) 28.2%, Mastercard (MA) 46.3%, Tradeweb Markets (TW) 40.7%). On return on invested capital, Mastercard (MA) leads (Verisk Analytics (VRSK) 31.9%, Mastercard (MA) 59.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Tradeweb Markets (TW) returned the most: Verisk Analytics (VRSK) -16.6%, Mastercard (MA) +8.7%, Tradeweb Markets (TW) +10.7%. Over five years, Mastercard (MA) compounded fastest (Verisk Analytics (VRSK) -1.8%/yr, Mastercard (MA) +11.7%/yr, Tradeweb Markets (TW) +7.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Verisk Analytics (VRSK) 0.00%, Mastercard (MA) 0.00%, Tradeweb Markets (TW) 0.00%. Verisk Analytics (VRSK) and Mastercard (MA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Mastercard (MA) has been the steadiest (Verisk Analytics (VRSK) 37.2%, Mastercard (MA) 22.6%, Tradeweb Markets (TW) 30.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, VRSK, MA and TW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Mastercard (MA) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.