VHUB vs TER vs ATS Stock Comparison

VenHub Global, Teradyne and Ats Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
TER Teradyne, Inc
$323.68 -18.8% 1M +119.4% 1Y
Market cap
$50.62B
P/E
44.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.46B
Div. yield
0.16%
Test and Measurement Technology
7 wins
ATS ATS Corp /ATS
$19.00 -0.5% 1M -30.0% 1Y
Market cap
$1.86B
P/E
54.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.12B
Div. yield
–
Industrial Machinery Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Teradyne leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Teradyne 7, Ats 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionVHUBTERATSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $26.21M $50.62B $1.86B TER
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.4x 44.0x 54.8x TER
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 33.5x 18.4x ATS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +57.9% +14.8% TER
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -11,799.2% 25.8% 1.6% TER
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 35.3% 3.7% TER
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 3.5x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.16% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months — +119.4% -30.0% TER
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +18.8%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 162.6% 78.6% 51.9% ATS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 2/100 66/100 52/100 TER

Percentile Scorecard

VHUBTERATS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisVHUBTERATS
Valuation 0 #13 of 13 23 #87 of 112 87 #28 of 203
Growth 9 #11 of 12 90 #12 of 109 79 #40 of 188
Profitability 0 #12 of 12 94 #7 of 104 43 #104 of 183
Financial Health 0 #13 of 13 71 #34 of 116 24 #165 of 217
Shareholder Returns – 50 #41 of 81 27 #112 of 153
Overall 2 66 52
  • VHUB ranked among 14 companies in Robotics and Automation
  • TER ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • ATS ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodVHUBTERATSSPY
1 month -46.3%-18.8%-0.5% -0.2%
3 months -60.8%+0.9%-29.5% +3.9%
6 months -56.1%-14.9%-40.3% +8.2%
Year to date —+67.2%-31.0% +12.9%
1 year —+119.4%-30.0% +12.3%
3 years —+286.1%-45.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year —+56.9%-18.1% +23.3%
5 years —+136.2%— +67.9%
5 years, per year —+18.8%— +10.9%
10 years —+1,318.4%— +261.1%
10 years, per year —+30.4%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureVHUBTERATSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 162.6%78.6%51.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 198.1%85.3%62.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.613.381.54 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y —1.52-0.58 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -96.4%-59.7%-64.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -96.4%-33.1%-46.3% -1.2%
52-week high $8.08$483.84$35.38 $779.14
52-week low $0.29$144.38$17.29 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleVHUBTERATS
P/E now vs peer median -0.4x 44.0xmedian 33.2x 54.8xmedian 25.2x
P/S now vs peer median 51.9xmedian 18.7x 11.3xmedian 2.8x 0.9xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -0.6x 33.6xmedian 20.0x 12.3xmedian 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1.6xmedian 14.5x 65.8xmedian 29.8x 10.3xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median -495.8xmedian 1.1x 14.6xmedian 3.0x 1.5xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median — 1.52median 1.17 -1.71median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsVHUBTERATS
Revenue $505.29K $4.46B $2.12B
Gross profit -$111.65K $2.64B $594.19M
Operating income -$42.78M $1.35B $119.42M
Net income -$59.62M $1.15B $33.97M
Free cash flow -$16.53M $769.75M $180.36M
R&D $1.05M $559.87M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.69 $7.29 $0.35
Cash & equivalents $2.56M $349.54M $140.09M
Total debt – – $3.79B
Shares (diluted) 86.30M 157.69M 98.14M
Enterprise value $17.76M $49.43B $1.19B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricVHUBTERATS
P/E -0.4x 44.0x 54.8x
P/FCF -1.6x 65.8x 10.3x
P/Operating cash flow -1.7x 47.5x 9.1x
P/S 51.9x 11.3x 0.9x
P/B -495.8x 14.6x 1.5x
P/Tangible book -495.8x 15.0x 2.4x
EV/EBITDA -0.6x 33.6x 12.3x
EV/EBIT -0.6x 37.2x 21.7x
EV/Revenue 46.8x 11.3x 1.2x
EV/FCF -1.4x 65.3x 14.4x
EV/Operating cash flow -1.5x 47.2x 12.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 1.52 -1.71

Growth

14 metrics
MetricVHUBTERATS
Revenue growth (1Y) – 57.9% 14.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 16.0% 1.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 58.2% 24.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 16.7% 1.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) -193.6% 160.9% 4,708%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 28.8% -12.6%
Net income growth (1Y) -76.7% 145.2% 228.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 27.2% -30.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 42.3% 149.0% 227.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 29.0% -32.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 34.4% 32.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 19.9% 77.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 38.4% 37.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 18.5% 279.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricVHUBTERATS
Gross margin -22.1% 59.2% 28.0%
EBITDA margin -8,423% 33.5% 10.0%
Operating margin -8,466% 30.2% 5.6%
Pretax margin -10,867% 30.2% 2.4%
Net margin -11,799% 25.8% 1.6%
FCF margin -3,271% 17.2% 8.5%
Operating cash flow margin -3,074% 23.9% 9.6%
Return on equity -3,339% 35.2% 2.7%
Return on assets -559.7% 24.9% 1.1%
Return on invested capital – 35.3% 3.7%
Return on capital employed -1,898% 37.8% –
Asset turnover 0.1x 1.0x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.3x 0.9x 6.0x
Stock comp / revenue 6,401% 1.7% 0.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricVHUBTERATS
Debt / assets – – 28.8%
Debt / equity – – 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 3.5x
Debt / FCF – – 4.8x
Liabilities / assets 100.7% 29.5% 57.9%
Equity / assets -0.7% 70.5% 42.1%
Interest coverage -3.5x 118.8x 1.7x
Current ratio 0.8x 2.1x –
Quick ratio 0.3x 1.3x –
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.3x –
Altman Z-score -34.51 23.43 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricVHUBTERATS
Dividend yield – 0.2% –
Net buyback yield -72.0% 0.9% 0.3%
Shareholder yield -72.0% 1.1% 0.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusVHUBTERATS
Forward P/E – 33.5xFY2026 18.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $9.65FY2026 $1.03FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +143.7%FY2026 -14.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +25.7% +37.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $5.01BFY2026 $1.98BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +57.1%FY2026 -7.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +18.9% +2.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersVHUBTERATS
Held by institutions – 97.3% 83.4%
Institutions holding – 1,419 143
Change in shares held, QoQ – +5.2% -9.9%
Institutions buying – 828 82
Institutions selling – 456 46
Buyers to sellers – 1.82 1.78

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

VHUBTERATS
VHUB 1.00 -0.07 0.01
TER -0.07 1.00 0.26
ATS 0.01 0.26 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, VHUB, TER and ATS?

Teradyne (TER) is the largest by market capitalisation: VenHub Global (VHUB) $26.21M, Teradyne (TER) $50.62B, Ats (ATS) $1.86B.

Which stock is cheaper, VHUB, TER and ATS?

Teradyne (TER) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (VenHub Global (VHUB) -0.4x, Teradyne (TER) 44.0x, Ats (ATS) 54.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ats (ATS) is cheapest (Teradyne (TER) 33.5x, Ats (ATS) 18.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Teradyne (TER) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Teradyne (TER) +57.9%, Ats (ATS) +14.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Teradyne (TER) has the highest net margin (VenHub Global (VHUB) -11,799.2%, Teradyne (TER) 25.8%, Ats (ATS) 1.6%). On return on invested capital, Teradyne (TER) leads (Teradyne (TER) 35.3%, Ats (ATS) 3.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Teradyne (TER) returned the most: Teradyne (TER) +119.4%, Ats (ATS) -30.0%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Teradyne (TER) 0.16%. VenHub Global (VHUB) and Ats (ATS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ats (ATS) has been the steadiest (VenHub Global (VHUB) 162.6%, Teradyne (TER) 78.6%, Ats (ATS) 51.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, VHUB, TER and ATS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Teradyne (TER) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.