VALU vs MH vs NWSA Stock Comparison

Value Line, McGraw Hill and News Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
VALU Value Line Inc
$41.64 +6.9% 1M +7.2% 1Y
Market cap
$390.67M
P/E
19.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$32.89M
Div. yield
3.30%
Publishing Communication Services
3 wins
MH McGraw Hill, Inc.
$13.67 +9.2% 1M +10.7% 1Y
Market cap
$2.61B
P/E
28.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.12B
Div. yield
–
Publishing Communication Services
3 wins
NWSA News Corp
$29.31 +0.7% 1M +9.9% 1Y
Market cap
$16.31B
P/E
28.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.03B
Div. yield
0.68%
Publishing Communication Services
6 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

News leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (News 6, Value Line 3, McGraw Hill 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionVALUMHNWSALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $390.67M $2.61B $16.31B NWSA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 19.7x 28.2x 28.5x VALU
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 6.6x 23.4x MH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -5.5% +0.1% +6.8% NWSA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 60.3% 4.4% 6.3% VALU
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 8.9% 6.6% MH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.9x -0.1x NWSA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 3.30% — 0.68% VALU
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +7.2% +10.7% +9.9% MH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.9%/yr — +5.1%/yr NWSA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 35.0% 60.0% 26.3% NWSA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 48/100 52/100 69/100 NWSA

Percentile Scorecard

VALUMHNWSA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisVALUMHNWSA
Valuation 29 #38 of 53 75 #14 of 53 58 #23 of 53
Growth 26 #33 of 44 72 #13 of 44 93 #4 of 44
Profitability 73 #12 of 42 88 #6 of 42 76 #11 of 42
Financial Health 93 #5 of 61 23 #47 of 61 85 #10 of 61
Shareholder Returns 20 #21 of 26 4 #25 of 26 32 #18 of 26
Overall 48 52 69
  • VALU ranked among 61 companies in Advertising and Media
  • MH ranked among 61 companies in Advertising and Media
  • NWSA ranked among 61 companies in Advertising and Media

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodVALUMHNWSASPY
1 month +6.9%+9.2%+0.7% +0.9%
3 months +17.5%+22.1%+1.7% +5.9%
6 months +20.6%+13.9%+11.7% +8.5%
Year to date +8.4%-17.2%+12.2% +13.3%
1 year +7.2%+10.7%+9.9% +12.4%
3 years +8.2%—+45.0% +88.1%
3 years, per year +2.6%—+13.2% +23.5%
5 years +20.9%—+28.0% +68.2%
5 years, per year +3.9%—+5.1% +11.0%
10 years +131.3%—+140.8% +263.4%
10 years, per year +8.7%—+9.2% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureVALUMHNWSASPY
Volatility, 1Y 35.0%60.0%26.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.3%54.0%27.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.080.140.17 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.210.180.37 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -68.3%-49.4%-38.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -6.3%-24.0%-6.0% -0.9%
52-week high $44.44$17.99$31.19 $779.14
52-week low $32.00$9.11$22.40 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleVALUMHNWSA
P/E now vs peer median 19.7xmedian 18.7x 28.2xmedian 18.7x 28.5xmedian 18.7x
P/S now vs peer median 11.9xmedian 0.6x 1.2xmedian 0.6x 1.8xmedian 0.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 69.7xmedian 10.6x 8.3xmedian 10.6x 10.6xmedian 10.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 22.0xmedian 8.9x 7.8xmedian 8.9x 20.1xmedian 8.9x
P/B now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 1.6x 3.3xmedian 1.6x 1.8xmedian 1.6x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.49 —median 0.49 0.49median 0.49

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsVALUMHNWSA
Revenue $32.89M $2.12B $9.03B
Gross profit – $1.73B –
Operating income $3.56M $294.84M –
Net income $19.83M $92.68M $743.00M
Free cash flow $17.73M $335.92M $811.00M
EPS (diluted) – $0.48 $1.03
Cash & equivalents $16.02M $193.64M $2.10B
Total debt – $2.57B $1.99B
Shares (diluted) – 191.31M 558.40M
Enterprise value $137.98M $1.19B $8.51B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricVALUMHNWSA
P/E 19.7x 28.2x 28.5x
P/FCF 22.0x 7.8x 20.1x
P/Operating cash flow 22.0x 6.1x 13.2x
P/S 11.9x 1.2x 1.8x
P/B 3.6x 3.3x 1.8x
P/Tangible book 3.6x -6.8x 2.2x
EV/EBITDA 69.7x 8.3x 10.6x
EV/EBIT 94.8x 16.9x 15.5x
EV/Revenue 10.3x 2.4x 1.8x
EV/FCF 19.1x 14.9x 20.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 19.1x 11.7x 13.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – 0.49

Growth

14 metrics
MetricVALUMHNWSA
Revenue growth (1Y) -5.5% 0.1% 6.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -5.9% – 4.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 2.1% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -36.8% -9.9% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -32.7% – –
Net income growth (1Y) -6.7% 222.1% -44.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 2.4% – 58.4%
EPS growth (1Y) – 206.4% -50.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – 58.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -15.7% -22.5% 26.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -0.3% – 16.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -15.0% -30.2% 42.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -0.3% – 23.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricVALUMHNWSA
Gross margin – 81.7% –
EBITDA margin 14.7% 28.6% 17.0%
Operating margin 10.8% 13.9% –
Pretax margin 40.5% 3.5% 11.6%
Net margin 60.3% 4.4% 6.3%
FCF margin 53.9% 15.9% 9.0%
Operating cash flow margin 53.9% 20.2% 13.7%
Return on equity 5.5% 12.2% 8.0%
Return on assets 3.9% 1.7% 4.8%
Return on invested capital – 8.9% 6.6%
Return on capital employed 2.7% 6.9% 8.2%
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.4x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 4.6x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.8% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricVALUMHNWSA
Debt / assets – 47.9% 12.8%
Debt / equity – 3.3x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.9x -0.1x
Debt / FCF – 7.7x 2.5x
Liabilities / assets 28.5% 85.3% 40.6%
Equity / assets 71.5% 14.7% 59.4%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 4.1x 0.8x 1.6x
Quick ratio 2.4x 0.5x 1.4x
Cash ratio 2.4x 0.2x 0.8x
Altman Z-score 7.35 0.55 2.46

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricVALUMHNWSA
Dividend yield 3.3% – 0.7%
Net buyback yield 0.2% -15.2% 3.9%
Shareholder yield 3.6% -15.2% 4.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) 62.8% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 70.2% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 7.9% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 8.6% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusVALUMHNWSA
Forward P/E – 6.6xFY2026 23.4xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year – $2.08FY2026 $1.25FY2027
EPS growth, next FY – +2.0%FY2026 +5.9%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after – +2.4% +30.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $2.09BFY2026 $9.15BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY – -0.5%FY2026 +1.3%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after – +10.5% +3.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersVALUMHNWSA
Held by institutions 5.6% 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 53 111 636
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.8% -2.3% -3.3%
Institutions buying 16 60 344
Institutions selling 18 36 189
Buyers to sellers 0.89 1.67 1.82

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

VALUMHNWSA
VALU 1.00 0.03 0.07
MH 0.03 1.00 0.25
NWSA 0.07 0.25 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, VALU, MH and NWSA?

News (NWSA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Value Line (VALU) $390.67M, McGraw Hill (MH) $2.61B, News (NWSA) $16.31B.

Which stock is cheaper, VALU, MH and NWSA?

Value Line (VALU) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Value Line (VALU) 19.7x, McGraw Hill (MH) 28.2x, News (NWSA) 28.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, McGraw Hill (MH) is cheapest (McGraw Hill (MH) 6.6x, News (NWSA) 23.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

News (NWSA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Value Line (VALU) -5.5%, McGraw Hill (MH) +0.1%, News (NWSA) +6.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Value Line (VALU) has the highest net margin (Value Line (VALU) 60.3%, McGraw Hill (MH) 4.4%, News (NWSA) 6.3%). On return on invested capital, McGraw Hill (MH) leads (McGraw Hill (MH) 8.9%, News (NWSA) 6.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year McGraw Hill (MH) returned the most: Value Line (VALU) +7.2%, McGraw Hill (MH) +10.7%, News (NWSA) +9.9%. Over five years, News (NWSA) compounded fastest (Value Line (VALU) +3.9%/yr, News (NWSA) +5.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Value Line (VALU) has the highest dividend yield: Value Line (VALU) 3.30%, News (NWSA) 0.68%. McGraw Hill (MH) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, News (NWSA) has been the steadiest (Value Line (VALU) 35.0%, McGraw Hill (MH) 60.0%, News (NWSA) 26.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, VALU, MH and NWSA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, News (NWSA) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.