UWMC vs BSBR vs FNMA Stock Comparison

UWM Holdings, Banco Santander (Brasil) and Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.51 +20.8% 1M -74.1% 1Y
Market cap
$511.35M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae 5, UWM Holdings 2, Banco Santander (Brasil) 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionUWMCBSBRFNMALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $511.35M $17.35B $27.28B FNMA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -13.8x — 21.8x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.9x 6.7x 1.5x FNMA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +26.1% — -0.1% UWMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -1.0% — 4.2% FNMA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.3% — 2.9% UWMC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 10.6x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -74.1% -17.0% -64.8% BSBR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -26.0%/yr -5.7%/yr +35.7%/yr FNMA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 80.2% 38.4% 85.7% BSBR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 35/100 — 57/100 FNMA

Percentile Scorecard

UWMCBSBRFNMA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisUWMCBSBRFNMA
Valuation 20 #136 of 169 – 72 #48 of 169
Growth 16 #137 of 162 – 87 #22 of 162
Profitability 30 #105 of 149 – 63 #56 of 149
Financial Health 17 #132 of 158 30 #111 of 158 6 #149 of 158
Shareholder Returns 94 #9 of 136 99 #4 of 338 –
Overall 35 – 57
  • UWMC ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • BSBR ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • FNMA ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodUWMCBSBRFNMASPY
1 month +20.8%-20.5%-6.9% +0.9%
3 months -24.1%-11.0%-33.3% +5.9%
6 months -56.5%-20.9%-47.3% +8.5%
Year to date -65.5%-25.5%-62.3% +13.3%
1 year -74.1%-17.0%-64.8% +12.4%
3 years -69.7%-15.7%+454.8% +88.1%
3 years, per year -32.9%-5.6%+77.1% +23.5%
5 years -77.8%-25.5%+360.2% +68.2%
5 years, per year -26.0%-5.7%+35.7% +11.0%
10 years —-42.5%+139.6% +263.4%
10 years, per year —-5.4%+9.1% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureUWMCBSBRFNMASPY
Volatility, 1Y 80.2%38.4%85.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 89.8%40.3%74.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.471.211.29 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.92-0.44-0.76 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.5%-52.2%-78.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -75.2%-36.8%-66.1% -0.9%
52-week high $6.10$7.20$11.95 $779.14
52-week low $1.00$4.55$3.26 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleUWMCBSBRFNMA
P/E now vs peer median -13.7xmedian 11.4x —median 12.1x 18.9xmedian 11.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 2.7x —median 3.4x 0.8xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.2xmedian 11.3x —median 5.1x —median 11.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -0.5xmedian 6.9x —median 10.8x 0.7xmedian 6.9x
P/B now vs peer median 2.5xmedian 0.7x 1.4xmedian 1.2x 0.2xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.27median 0.34 —median 1.32 0.04median 0.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsUWMCBSBRFNMA
Revenue $3.58B – $30.12B
Net income -$104.96M – $15.41B
Free cash flow -$4.92B – $32.60B
EPS (diluted) $-0.11 – $0.21
Cash & equivalents $498.41M $5.42B –
Total debt $19.23B $15.65B $4.17T
Shares (diluted) 337.53M 3.93B 5.89B
Enterprise value -$1.79B -$330.68B $27.28B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricUWMCBSBRFNMA
P/E -13.7x – 18.9x
P/FCF -0.5x – 0.7x
P/Operating cash flow -0.5x – 0.7x
P/S 0.7x – 0.8x
P/B 2.5x 1.4x 0.2x
P/Tangible book -0.6x 1.9x 0.2x
EV/EBITDA 15.2x – –
EV/EBIT 17.1x – 27.5x
EV/Revenue 2.2x – 139.2x
EV/FCF -1.6x – 128.6x
EV/Operating cash flow -1.6x – 128.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.27 – 0.04

Growth

14 metrics
MetricUWMCBSBRFNMA
Revenue growth (1Y) 26.1% – -0.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 27.3% – 0.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) -175.0% – 2.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -31.9% – 1.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -287.6% – 10,350%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -51.2% – 493.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -103.1% – 480.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.2% – 17.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -100.4% – 480.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.4% – 17.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricUWMCBSBRFNMA
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 14.6% – –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin -3.2% – 63.7%
Net margin -1.0% – 4.2%
FCF margin -137.6% – 108.2%
Operating cash flow margin -135.9% – 108.2%
Return on equity -8.1% – 13.0%
Return on assets -0.6% – 0.4%
Return on invested capital 6.3% – 2.9%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.2x – 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 46.3x – 2.1x
Stock comp / revenue 1.6% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricUWMCBSBRFNMA
Debt / assets 33.5% 6.3% 96.6%
Debt / equity 6.1x 0.6x 34.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 10.6x – –
Debt / FCF -1.2x – 127.9x
Liabilities / assets 94.5% 90.1% 97.2%
Equity / assets 5.5% 9.9% 2.8%
Interest coverage 0.8x – 1.1x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricUWMCBSBRFNMA
Dividend yield 19.9% 9.2% –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 19.9% 9.2% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusUWMCBSBRFNMA
Forward P/E 7.9xFY2026 6.7xFY2026 1.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.19FY2026 $0.68FY2026 $2.78FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +58.3%FY2026 -18.1%FY2026 +13.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +26.3% +30.9% -7.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.26BFY2026 $16.93BFY2026 $31.10BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -5.8%FY2026 +6.4%FY2026 +7.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +37.3% +9.6% -7.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersUWMCBSBRFNMA
Held by institutions 17.0% 14.6% 0.0%
Institutions holding 290 88 25
Change in shares held, QoQ +31.8% +1.3% +58.6%
Institutions buying 213 52 13
Institutions selling 50 24 2
Buyers to sellers 4.26 2.17 6.50

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

UWMCBSBRFNMA
UWMC 1.00 0.14 0.04
BSBR 0.14 1.00 0.09
FNMA 0.04 0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, UWMC, BSBR and FNMA?

Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) is the largest by market capitalisation: UWM Holdings (UWMC) $511.35M, Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) $17.35B, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) $27.28B.

Which company is growing faster?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) -0.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) has the highest net margin (UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) 4.2%). On return on invested capital, UWM Holdings (UWMC) leads (UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) 2.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) returned the most: UWM Holdings (UWMC) -74.1%, Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) -17.0%, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) -64.8%. Over five years, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) compounded fastest (UWM Holdings (UWMC) -26.0%/yr, Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) -5.7%/yr, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) +35.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) has been the steadiest (UWM Holdings (UWMC) 80.2%, Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) 38.4%, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) 85.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, UWMC, BSBR and FNMA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.