UUUU vs EMAT vs CCJ Stock Comparison

Energy Fuels, Evolution Metals & Technologies and Cameco Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
UUUU Energy Fuels Inc
$8.40 -23.9% 1M -58.1% 1Y
Market cap
$2.10B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$105.76M
Div. yield
–
Uranium Energy
1 win
CCJ Cameco Corp
$83.87 -3.6% 1M -21.6% 1Y
Market cap
$36.52B
P/E
48.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.73B
Div. yield
0.29%
Uranium Energy
7 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Cameco leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Cameco 7, Energy Fuels 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionUUUUEMATCCJLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.10B $1.04B $36.52B CCJ
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -25.6x -19.5x 48.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 76.9x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +62.5% — +16.0% UUUU
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -77.3% — 27.6% CCJ
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -6.7% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.9x — -0.1x CCJ
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 0.29% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -58.1% -86.6% -21.6% CCJ
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.4%/yr — +28.1%/yr CCJ
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 84.4% 190.3% 50.3% CCJ
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 43/100 20/100 81/100 CCJ

Percentile Scorecard

UUUUEMATCCJ

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisUUUUEMATCCJ
Valuation 14 #20 of 23 17 #134 of 162 55 #11 of 23
Growth 75 #6 of 21 31 #102 of 147 100 #1 of 21
Profitability 47 #10 of 18 – 100 #1 of 18
Financial Health 57 #10 of 22 12 #144 of 164 71 #7 of 22
Shareholder Returns 22 #8 of 10 – –
Overall 43 20 81
  • UUUU ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium
  • EMAT ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • CCJ ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodUUUUEMATCCJSPY
1 month -23.9%-47.5%-3.6% +0.9%
3 months -21.8%-61.8%-0.8% +5.9%
6 months -57.1%-81.1%-26.6% +8.5%
Year to date -42.2%-84.7%-8.3% +13.3%
1 year -58.1%-86.6%-21.6% +12.4%
3 years +11.7%-84.4%+121.1% +88.1%
3 years, per year +3.8%-46.2%+30.3% +23.5%
5 years +7.1%—+245.1% +68.2%
5 years, per year +1.4%—+28.1% +11.0%
10 years +483.3%—+957.6% +263.4%
10 years, per year +19.3%—+26.6% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureUUUUEMATCCJSPY
Volatility, 1Y 84.4%190.3%50.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 83.2%158.9%50.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.130.492.36 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.69-0.45-0.43 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -72.9%-93.7%-41.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -69.7%-92.1%-37.5% -0.9%
52-week high $27.72$21.29$134.09 $779.14
52-week low $7.52$1.35$78.61 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleUUUUEMATCCJ
P/E now vs peer median -25.6xmedian 27.3x -19.5xmedian 13.4x 48.5xmedian 27.3x
P/S now vs peer median 19.9xmedian 7.5x 638.5xmedian 3.2x 13.4xmedian 7.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -20.4xmedian 29.3x —median 7.3x 45.4xmedian 29.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -25.4xmedian 10.6x —median 14.8x 47.4xmedian 10.6x
P/B now vs peer median 2.6xmedian 1.2x -55.4xmedian 2.3x 7.2xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.67median 51.60 -0.56median 0.31 —median 51.60

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsUUUUEMATCCJ
Revenue $105.76M – $2.73B
Gross profit $43.20M – –
Operating income -$96.29M -$15.92M $649.76M
Net income -$82.51M -$53.55M $753.00M
Free cash flow -$82.50M – –
R&D $39.87M – –
EPS (diluted) $-0.33 $-0.09 $1.73
Cash & equivalents $58.42M $5.25M $814.08M
Total debt $2.03B $6.18M $4.09B
Shares (diluted) 249.32M 621.76M 435.58M
Enterprise value -$841.00M $1.03B $33.11B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricUUUUEMATCCJ
P/E -25.6x -19.5x 48.5x
P/FCF -25.4x – 47.4x
P/Operating cash flow -33.6x – –
P/S 19.9x 638.5x 13.4x
P/B 2.6x -55.4x 7.2x
P/Tangible book 2.6x -41.4x 7.3x
EV/EBITDA -20.4x – 45.4x
EV/EBIT -19.1x -65.7x 56.1x
EV/Revenue 17.4x – 13.3x
EV/FCF -22.3x – –
EV/Operating cash flow -29.5x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.67 -0.56 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricUUUUEMATCCJ
Revenue growth (1Y) 62.5% – 16.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 52.9% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 1,943% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 41.0% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -3.7% -258.6% 40.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -35.1% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 11.5% 10.2% 156.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -44.3% -208.9% –
EPS growth (1Y) 22.6% 34.3% 218.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -38.0% 34.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 29.0% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -24.4% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 17.3% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -10.3% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricUUUUEMATCCJ
Gross margin 40.9% – –
EBITDA margin -85.5% – 29.4%
Operating margin -91.0% – 23.8%
Pretax margin -77.8% – 16.4%
Net margin -77.3% – 27.6%
FCF margin -78.0% – –
Operating cash flow margin -59.1% – –
Return on equity -10.8% – –
Return on assets -5.5% -91.1% –
Return on invested capital -6.7% – –
Return on capital employed -6.6% – –
Asset turnover 0.1x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x – –
Stock comp / revenue 13.5% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricUUUUEMATCCJ
Debt / assets 44.2% 6.5% 11.0%
Debt / equity 0.9x -0.3x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.9x – -0.1x
Debt / FCF -8.2x – –
Liabilities / assets 48.0% 119.8% 33.0%
Equity / assets 52.0% -19.8% 67.0%
Interest coverage – – 21.4x
Current ratio 27.9x 0.2x 2.5x
Quick ratio 25.7x 0.2x 1.5x
Cash ratio 25.3x 0.1x 1.1x
Altman Z-score 1.86 – 10.15

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricUUUUEMATCCJ
Dividend yield – – 0.3%
Net buyback yield -13.2% – –
Shareholder yield -13.2% – 0.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusUUUUEMATCCJ
Forward P/E – – 76.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.27FY2026 $-0.43FY2026 $1.09FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +3.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +75.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $140.99MFY2026 $15.71MFY2026 $2.31BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +113.9%FY2026 +124.4%FY2026 -9.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +90.3% +2,427.0% +15.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersUUUUEMATCCJ
Held by institutions 72.3% – 63.3%
Institutions holding 349 – 1,027
Change in shares held, QoQ +8.7% – +4.0%
Institutions buying 203 – 506
Institutions selling 93 – 341
Buyers to sellers 2.18 – 1.48

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

UUUUEMATCCJ
UUUU 1.00 0.07 0.79
EMAT 0.07 1.00 0.11
CCJ 0.79 0.11 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, UUUU, EMAT and CCJ?

Cameco (CCJ) is the largest by market capitalisation: Energy Fuels (UUUU) $2.10B, Evolution Metals & Technologies (EMAT) $1.04B, Cameco (CCJ) $36.52B.

Which company is growing faster?

Energy Fuels (UUUU) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Energy Fuels (UUUU) +62.5%, Cameco (CCJ) +16.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cameco (CCJ) has the highest net margin (Energy Fuels (UUUU) -77.3%, Cameco (CCJ) 27.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cameco (CCJ) returned the most: Energy Fuels (UUUU) -58.1%, Evolution Metals & Technologies (EMAT) -86.6%, Cameco (CCJ) -21.6%. Over five years, Cameco (CCJ) compounded fastest (Energy Fuels (UUUU) +1.4%/yr, Cameco (CCJ) +28.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Cameco (CCJ) 0.29%. Energy Fuels (UUUU) and Evolution Metals & Technologies (EMAT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cameco (CCJ) has been the steadiest (Energy Fuels (UUUU) 84.4%, Evolution Metals & Technologies (EMAT) 190.3%, Cameco (CCJ) 50.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, UUUU, EMAT and CCJ?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cameco (CCJ) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.