UUUU vs EMAT vs AEC Stock Comparison

Energy Fuels, Evolution Metals & Technologies and Anfield Energy Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
UUUU Energy Fuels Inc
$7.55 -33.6% 1M -64.7% 1Y
Market cap
$1.89B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$105.76M
Div. yield
–
Uranium Energy
4 wins
AEC Anfield Energy Inc.
$2.78 -23.6% 1M -63.7% 1Y
Market cap
$42.94M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.19M
Div. yield
–
Uranium Energy
3 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Energy Fuels leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Energy Fuels 4, Anfield Energy 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionUUUUEMATAECLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.89B $876.72M $42.94M UUUU
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -23.0x -16.4x -2.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +62.5% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -77.3% — -1,743.6% UUUU
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -6.7% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.9x — -0.5x AEC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -64.7% -90.5% -63.7% AEC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -1.5%/yr — -21.0%/yr UUUU
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 84.2% 189.9% 80.6% AEC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 47/100 21/100 0/100 UUUU

Percentile Scorecard

UUUUEMATAEC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisUUUUEMATAEC
Valuation 30 #8 of 11 17 #95 of 114 0 #11 of 11
Growth 43 #5 of 8 31 #71 of 102 0 #8 of 8
Profitability – – –
Financial Health 67 #4 of 10 16 #101 of 120 0 #10 of 10
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 47 21 0
  • UUUU ranked among 13 companies in Coal and Uranium
  • EMAT ranked among 128 companies in Metals and Mining
  • AEC ranked among 13 companies in Coal and Uranium

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodUUUUEMATAECSPY
1 month -33.6%-55.9%-23.6% -0.8%
3 months -35.6%-71.9%-38.4% +3.5%
6 months -64.6%-84.6%-48.5% +7.0%
Year to date -48.1%-87.2%-45.8% +12.2%
1 year -64.7%-90.5%-63.7% +13.0%
3 years +0.4%-86.9%-38.2% +86.3%
3 years, per year +0.1%-49.2%-14.8% +23.1%
5 years -7.1%—-69.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year -1.5%—-21.0% +11.0%
10 years +435.5%—-96.3% +258.0%
10 years, per year +18.3%—-28.1% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureUUUUEMATAECSPY
Volatility, 1Y 84.2%189.9%80.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 83.2%158.3%79.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.110.452.47 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.77-0.48-0.79 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -72.9%-93.7%-75.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -72.8%-93.4%-70.9% -1.8%
52-week high $27.72$21.29$9.56 $779.14
52-week low $7.52$1.35$2.78 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleUUUUEMATAEC
P/E now vs peer median -23.0xmedian 25.2x -16.4xmedian 10.6x -2.1xmedian 25.2x
P/S now vs peer median 17.8xmedian 34.5x 535.9xmedian 3.1x 36.1xmedian 34.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -18.0xmedian 42.8x —median 5.9x -2.9xmedian 42.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median -22.9xmedian 25.7x —median 11.3x -3.6xmedian 25.7x
P/B now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 1.0x -46.5xmedian 2.3x 1.2xmedian 1.0x
PEG now vs peer median 0.61median 0.07 -0.47median 0.17 —median 0.07

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsUUUUEMATAEC
Revenue $105.76M – $1.19M
Gross profit $43.20M – –
Operating income -$96.29M -$15.92M -$17.90M
Net income -$82.51M -$53.55M -$20.72M
Free cash flow -$82.50M – -$12.00M
R&D $39.87M – $8.34M
EPS (diluted) $-0.33 $-0.09 $-1.34
Cash & equivalents $58.42M $5.25M $1.27M
Total debt $2.03B $6.18M $35.69M
Shares (diluted) 249.32M 621.76M 15.45M
Enterprise value -$1.05B $858.18M $27.73M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricUUUUEMATAEC
P/E -23.0x -16.4x -2.1x
P/FCF -22.9x – -3.6x
P/Operating cash flow -30.2x – -3.4x
P/S 17.8x 535.9x 36.1x
P/B 2.4x -46.5x 1.2x
P/Tangible book 2.4x -34.8x 1.3x
EV/EBITDA -18.0x – -2.9x
EV/EBIT -16.9x -55.1x -2.9x
EV/Revenue 15.4x – 43.2x
EV/FCF -19.7x – -4.3x
EV/Operating cash flow -26.1x – -4.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.61 -0.47 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricUUUUEMATAEC
Revenue growth (1Y) 62.5% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 52.9% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 1,943% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 41.0% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -3.7% -258.6% -112.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -35.1% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 11.5% 10.2% -111.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -44.3% -208.9% –
EPS growth (1Y) 22.6% 34.3% -85.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -38.0% 34.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 29.0% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -24.4% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 17.3% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -10.3% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricUUUUEMATAEC
Gross margin 40.9% – –
EBITDA margin -85.5% – -1,497%
Operating margin -91.0% – -1,507%
Pretax margin -77.8% – -1,640%
Net margin -77.3% – -1,744%
FCF margin -78.0% – -1,010%
Operating cash flow margin -59.1% – -1,066%
Return on equity -10.8% – -56.1%
Return on assets -5.5% -91.1% -30.7%
Return on invested capital -6.7% – –
Return on capital employed -6.6% – -27.8%
Asset turnover 0.1x – 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x – 0.6x
Stock comp / revenue 13.5% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricUUUUEMATAEC
Debt / assets 44.2% 6.5% 14.4%
Debt / equity 0.9x -0.3x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.9x – -0.5x
Debt / FCF -8.2x – -0.8x
Liabilities / assets 48.0% 119.8% 48.3%
Equity / assets 52.0% -19.8% 51.7%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 27.9x 0.2x 0.9x
Quick ratio 25.7x 0.2x 0.4x
Cash ratio 25.3x 0.1x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 1.69 – -1.83

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricUUUUEMATAEC
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -14.7% – –
Shareholder yield -14.7% – 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusUUUUEMATAEC
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.27FY2026 $-0.43FY2026 –
Revenue, next fiscal year $140.58MFY2026 $15.71MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +113.3%FY2026 +124.4%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +89.2% +2,427.0% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersUUUUEMATAEC
Held by institutions 72.3% – 10.6%
Institutions holding 349 – 25
Change in shares held, QoQ +8.7% – -18.7%
Institutions buying 203 – 9
Institutions selling 93 – 7
Buyers to sellers 2.18 – 1.29

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

UUUUEMATAEC
UUUU 1.00 0.07 0.65
EMAT 0.07 1.00 0.07
AEC 0.65 0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, UUUU, EMAT and AEC?

Energy Fuels (UUUU) is the largest by market capitalisation: Energy Fuels (UUUU) $1.89B, Evolution Metals & Technologies (EMAT) $876.72M, Anfield Energy (AEC) $42.94M.

Which company is more profitable?

Energy Fuels (UUUU) has the highest net margin (Energy Fuels (UUUU) -77.3%, Anfield Energy (AEC) -1,743.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Anfield Energy (AEC) returned the most: Energy Fuels (UUUU) -64.7%, Evolution Metals & Technologies (EMAT) -90.5%, Anfield Energy (AEC) -63.7%. Over five years, Energy Fuels (UUUU) compounded fastest (Energy Fuels (UUUU) -1.5%/yr, Anfield Energy (AEC) -21.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Anfield Energy (AEC) has been the steadiest (Energy Fuels (UUUU) 84.2%, Evolution Metals & Technologies (EMAT) 189.9%, Anfield Energy (AEC) 80.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, UUUU, EMAT and AEC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Energy Fuels (UUUU) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.