UTKN vs CNTN vs TONX Stock Comparison

Universal Token, Canton Strategic Holdings and TON Strategy Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
UTKN Universal Token
$1.70 -1.2% 1M -58.5% 1Y
Market cap
$172.65M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
-$1.45K
Div. yield
–
Blockchain Infrastructure Technology
1 win
TONX TON Strategy Co
$3.29 -8.1% 1M -19.6% 1Y
Market cap
$185.99M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Blockchain Infrastructure Technology
1 win

Head to Head

4 decided of 12

Canton Strategic Holdings leads on 2 of the 12 questions below (Canton Strategic Holdings 2, TON Strategy 1, Universal Token 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionUTKNCNTNTONXLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $172.65M $414.21M $185.99M CNTN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -616.6x -4.2x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -58.5% -38.2% -19.6% TONX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — -81.9%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 184.2% 93.4% 102.4% CNTN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 50/100 38/100 — UTKN

Percentile Scorecard

UTKNCNTNTONX

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisUTKNCNTNTONX
Valuation 39 #61 of 99 37 #63 of 99 –
Growth 57 #41 of 94 8 #87 of 94 –
Profitability 35 #59 of 90 39 #55 of 90 –
Financial Health 69 #33 of 105 97 #4 of 105 –
Shareholder Returns – 12 #54 of 61 –
Overall 50 38 –
  • UTKN ranked among 109 companies in Fintech
  • CNTN ranked among 109 companies in Fintech
  • TONX ranked among 109 companies in Fintech

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodUTKNCNTNTONXSPY
1 month -1.2%-25.7%-8.1% -0.2%
3 months +26.9%-6.4%+0.6% +3.9%
6 months +9.7%-42.1%+50.2% +8.2%
Year to date -38.8%-37.0%+65.3% +12.9%
1 year -58.5%-38.2%-19.6% +12.3%
3 years —-97.1%-94.8% +87.4%
3 years, per year —-69.3%-62.8% +23.3%
5 years ——-100.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year ——-81.9% +10.9%
10 years ——-100.0% +261.1%
10 years, per year ——-56.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureUTKNCNTNTONXSPY
Volatility, 1Y 184.2%93.4%102.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 410.1%98.8%93.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.621.912.81 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.32-0.41-0.19 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -77.2%-99.9%-100.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -58.5%-65.1%-23.7% -1.2%
52-week high $4.10$5.48$4.31 $779.14
52-week low $1.02$1.69$1.80 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleUTKNCNTNTONX
P/E now vs peer median -616.6xmedian 20.0x -4.2xmedian 20.0x —median 20.0x
P/S now vs peer median -119,401xmedian 2.3x 276.9xmedian 2.3x —median 2.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 17.5x —median 17.5x —median 17.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -621.4xmedian 15.9x -18.7xmedian 15.9x —median 15.9x
P/B now vs peer median 156.5xmedian 2.0x 0.9xmedian 2.0x —median 2.0x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.03 -0.48median 1.03 —median 1.03

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsUTKNCNTNTONX
Revenue -$1.45K – –
Operating income -$279.60K -$53.77M –
Net income -$280.01K -$98.12M –
Free cash flow -$277.85K -$22.17M –
EPS (diluted) $0.00 $-0.45 –
Cash & equivalents $223.00 $37.24M –
Shares (diluted) 101.56M 216.86M 58.67M
Enterprise value $172.63M $315.82M $185.99M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricUTKNCNTNTONX
P/E -616.6x -4.2x –
P/FCF -621.4x -18.7x –
P/Operating cash flow -621.4x -18.7x –
P/S -119,401x 276.9x –
P/B 156.5x 0.9x –
P/Tangible book 157.1x -6.1x –
EV/EBITDA – – –
EV/EBIT -617.7x -7.0x –
EV/Revenue -119,431x – –
EV/FCF -621.5x -17.0x –
EV/Operating cash flow -621.5x -17.0x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -0.48 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricUTKNCNTNTONX
Revenue growth (1Y) – – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -17.7% -360.0% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -81.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) -12.9% -716.7% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -122.4% –
EPS growth (1Y) -12.4% 89.2% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 8.8% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -3.9% -127.9% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -44.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -3.9% -127.9% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -44.0% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricUTKNCNTNTONX
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – – –
Net margin – – –
FCF margin – – –
Operating cash flow margin 19,215% – –
Return on equity -25.2% -17.8% –
Return on assets -24.3% -14.3% –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -24.4% -9.4% –
Asset turnover 0.0x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.0x 0.2x –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricUTKNCNTNTONX
Debt / assets 3.8% – –
Debt / equity 0.0x – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF -0.2x – –
Liabilities / assets 4.5% 19.4% –
Equity / assets 95.5% 80.6% –
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 0.9x 15.7x –
Quick ratio 0.0x 14.2x –
Cash ratio 0.0x 14.2x –
Altman Z-score 2,003 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricUTKNCNTNTONX
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -24.7% –
Shareholder yield – -24.7% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusUTKNCNTNTONX
EPS, next fiscal year – $-0.70FY2026 $-4.95FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year – $0.00FY2024 $118.07MFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY – – +823.9%FY2027

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersUTKNCNTNTONX
Held by institutions – 9.3% 58.2%
Institutions holding – 68 40
Change in shares held, QoQ – +70.5% +119.1%
Institutions buying – 60 21
Institutions selling – 5 11
Buyers to sellers – 12.00 1.91

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

UTKNCNTNTONX
UTKN 1.00 -0.06 -0.03
CNTN -0.06 1.00 0.27
TONX -0.03 0.27 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, UTKN, CNTN and TONX?

Canton Strategic Holdings (CNTN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Universal Token (UTKN) $172.65M, Canton Strategic Holdings (CNTN) $414.21M, TON Strategy (TONX) $185.99M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year TON Strategy (TONX) returned the most: Universal Token (UTKN) -58.5%, Canton Strategic Holdings (CNTN) -38.2%, TON Strategy (TONX) -19.6%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Canton Strategic Holdings (CNTN) has been the steadiest (Universal Token (UTKN) 184.2%, Canton Strategic Holdings (CNTN) 93.4%, TON Strategy (TONX) 102.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, UTKN, CNTN and TONX?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Canton Strategic Holdings (CNTN) leads on 2. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.