URI vs TT Stock Comparison

United Rentals and Trane Technologies Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
URI United Rentals, Inc.
$1,100.14 +6.5% 1M +20.3% 1Y
Market cap
$69.69B
P/E
24.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.50B
Div. yield
–
Equipment Rental Industrials
7 wins
TT Trane Technologies plc
$444.90 +1.8% 1M +7.0% 1Y
Market cap
$100.62B
P/E
34.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$22.21B
Div. yield
0.01%
HVAC Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

United Rentals leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (United Rentals 7, Trane Technologies 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionURITTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $69.69B $100.62B TT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 24.4x 34.1x URI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.7x 28.5x URI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.4% +7.0% URI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 16.3% 13.3% URI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 14.0% 24.4% TT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.3x 0.8x TT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +20.3% +7.0% URI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +24.5%/yr +19.7%/yr URI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.1% 29.2% TT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 51/100 URI

Percentile Scorecard

URITT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisURITT
Valuation 29 #33 of 46 9 #50 of 55
Growth 90 #5 of 39 66 #18 of 51
Profitability 92 #4 of 40 86 #8 of 51
Financial Health 17 #41 of 49 55 #27 of 59
Shareholder Returns 61 #13 of 32 38 #26 of 41
Overall 58 51
  • URI ranked among 49 companies in Distribution and Rental
  • TT ranked among 59 companies in Construction Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodURITTSPY
1 month +6.5%+1.8% -1.0%
3 months -3.7%-7.6% +2.9%
6 months +12.9%-8.5% +6.4%
Year to date +35.9%+14.3% +11.4%
1 year +20.3%+7.0% +13.1%
3 years +170.7%+138.5% +79.4%
3 years, per year +39.4%+33.6% +21.5%
5 years +198.7%+145.6% +67.7%
5 years, per year +24.5%+19.7% +10.9%
10 years +1,289.4%+772.0% +255.2%
10 years, per year +30.1%+24.2% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureURITTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.1%29.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 38.8%30.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.001.15 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.480.24 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -40.0%-40.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -5.6%-11.6% -2.5%
52-week high $1,165.29$503.46 $779.14
52-week low $710.47$376.43 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleURITT
P/E now vs peer median 23.9xmedian 25.9x 33.3xmedian 19.9x
P/S now vs peer median 3.9xmedian 1.0x 4.4xmedian 1.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.1xmedian 13.0x 23.1xmedian 12.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 76.5xmedian 23.0x 27.3xmedian 16.1x
P/B now vs peer median 7.0xmedian 2.4x 11.3xmedian 3.0x
PEG now vs peer median 2.51median 2.37 1.90median 0.98

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsURITT
Revenue $17.50B $22.21B
Gross profit $6.84B $7.86B
Operating income $4.47B $3.98B
Net income $2.86B $2.97B
Free cash flow $892.00M $3.58B
EPS (diluted) $45.89 $13.25
Cash & equivalents $153.00M $1.32B
Total debt $14.67B $18.46B
Shares (diluted) 62.26M 222.50M
Enterprise value $68.81B $95.34B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricURITT
P/E 23.9x 33.3x
P/FCF 76.5x 27.3x
P/Operating cash flow 11.0x 25.0x
P/S 3.9x 4.4x
P/B 7.0x 11.3x
P/Tangible book 7.4x 19.1x
EV/EBITDA 13.1x 23.1x
EV/EBIT 18.5x 25.4x
EV/Revenue 4.7x 4.6x
EV/FCF 92.7x 28.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.4x 25.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.51 1.90

Growth

14 metrics
MetricURITT
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.4% 7.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.0% 9.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 10.4% 4.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 6.0% 0.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 11.5% 4.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 5.7% 14.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 12.9% 3.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 6.2% 16.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 16.6% 4.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 9.5% 17.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 24.2% 19.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.9% 28.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 98.2% 26.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 83.7% 32.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricURITT
Gross margin 39.1% 35.4%
EBITDA margin 36.1% 19.7%
Operating margin 25.5% 17.9%
Pretax margin 21.8% 16.8%
Net margin 16.3% 13.3%
FCF margin 5.1% 16.1%
Operating cash flow margin 35.4% 17.6%
Return on equity 30.2% 34.4%
Return on assets 8.9% 12.7%
Return on invested capital 14.0% 24.4%
Return on capital employed 16.5% 26.7%
Asset turnover 0.5x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.2x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.9% 0.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricURITT
Debt / assets 44.7% 19.3%
Debt / equity 1.5x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.3x 0.8x
Debt / FCF 16.4x 1.3x
Liabilities / assets 70.4% 63.9%
Equity / assets 29.6% 36.1%
Interest coverage – 18.1x
Current ratio 0.8x 1.1x
Quick ratio 0.6x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 3.47 5.97

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricURITT
Dividend yield 0.7% 0.9%
Net buyback yield 2.7% 1.4%
Shareholder yield 3.4% 2.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 29.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 24.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 10.3%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 10.6%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusURITT
Forward P/E 20.7xFY2026 28.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $53.03FY2026 $15.63FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +26.1%FY2026 +19.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +4.3% +10.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.40BFY2026 $25.38BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +14.3%FY2026 +19.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.9% +7.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersURITT
Held by institutions 95.9% 87.0%
Institutions holding 1,586 1,809
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.7% +0.3%
Institutions buying 803 894
Institutions selling 537 578
Buyers to sellers 1.50 1.55

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

URITT
URI 1.00 0.29
TT 0.29 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, URI and TT?

Trane Technologies (TT) is the largest by market capitalisation: United Rentals (URI) $69.69B, Trane Technologies (TT) $100.62B.

Which stock is cheaper, URI and TT?

United Rentals (URI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (United Rentals (URI) 24.4x, Trane Technologies (TT) 34.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, United Rentals (URI) is cheapest (United Rentals (URI) 20.7x, Trane Technologies (TT) 28.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

United Rentals (URI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: United Rentals (URI) +9.4%, Trane Technologies (TT) +7.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

United Rentals (URI) has the highest net margin (United Rentals (URI) 16.3%, Trane Technologies (TT) 13.3%). On return on invested capital, Trane Technologies (TT) leads (United Rentals (URI) 14.0%, Trane Technologies (TT) 24.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year United Rentals (URI) returned the most: United Rentals (URI) +20.3%, Trane Technologies (TT) +7.0%. Over five years, United Rentals (URI) compounded fastest (United Rentals (URI) +24.5%/yr, Trane Technologies (TT) +19.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: United Rentals (URI) 0.00%, Trane Technologies (TT) 0.01%. United Rentals (URI) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Trane Technologies (TT) has been the steadiest (United Rentals (URI) 42.1%, Trane Technologies (TT) 29.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do URI and TT move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.29, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, URI and TT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, United Rentals (URI) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.