UAA vs GIL vs FIGS Stock Comparison

Under Armour, Gildan Activewear and Figs Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
UAA Under Armour, Inc.
$4.58 +3.6% 1M -4.8% 1Y
Market cap
$1.99B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$4.93B
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
1 win
GIL Gildan Activewear Inc.
$40.35 -1.5% 1M -33.2% 1Y
Market cap
$6.42B
P/E
30.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.72B
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
7 wins
FIGS FIGS, Inc.
$20.83 +55.1% 1M +153.1% 1Y
Market cap
$3.40B
P/E
55.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$710.08M
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Gildan Activewear leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Gildan Activewear 7, Figs 3, Under Armour 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionUAAGILFIGSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.99B $6.42B $3.40B GIL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -4.0x 30.4x 55.0x GIL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 38.2x 8.4x 57.9x GIL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -3.6% +38.0% +24.7% GIL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -10.0% 4.5% 8.7% FIGS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -5.2% 5.2% — GIL
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -18.3x 4.9x — UAA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -4.8% -33.2% +153.1% FIGS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -26.8%/yr +2.3%/yr -8.7%/yr GIL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 54.2% 42.3% 70.4% GIL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 28/100 35/100 67/100 FIGS

Percentile Scorecard

UAAGILFIGS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisUAAGILFIGS
Valuation 29 #33 of 46 33 #31 of 46 13 #40 of 46
Growth 2 #42 of 43 52 #21 of 43 100 #1 of 43
Profitability 12 #37 of 42 44 #24 of 42 81 #9 of 42
Financial Health 50 #27 of 53 29 #38 of 53 96 #3 of 53
Shareholder Returns 49 #18 of 34 18 #28 of 34 46 #19 of 34
Overall 28 35 67
  • UAA ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • GIL ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • FIGS ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodUAAGILFIGSSPY
1 month +3.6%-1.5%+55.1% -0.8%
3 months -35.2%-20.4%+109.8% +3.5%
6 months -28.7%-30.3%+33.4% +7.0%
Year to date -7.8%-35.4%+83.4% +12.2%
1 year -4.8%-33.2%+153.1% +13.0%
3 years -30.3%+47.9%+265.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year -11.3%+13.9%+54.1% +23.1%
5 years -78.9%+11.8%-36.4% +68.6%
5 years, per year -26.8%+2.3%-8.7% +11.0%
10 years -85.6%+57.1%— +258.0%
10 years, per year -17.6%+4.6%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureUAAGILFIGSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 54.2%42.3%70.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 55.6%44.6%65.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.291.210.75 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.09-0.792.17 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -84.5%-44.5%-91.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -43.7%-44.4%0.0% -1.8%
52-week high $8.14$72.58$20.83 $779.14
52-week low $4.17$40.30$7.38 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleUAAGILFIGS
P/E now vs peer median -4.0xmedian 16.6x 30.6xmedian 16.6x 56.0xmedian 16.6x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 0.7x 1.6xmedian 0.7x 4.6xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -201.9xmedian 9.7x 16.0xmedian 9.7x 37.8xmedian 9.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -24.2xmedian 12.2x 10.6xmedian 12.2x 33.7xmedian 12.2x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 2.2x 2.2xmedian 2.2x 7.4xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.08median 0.64 -1.41median 0.64 0.92median 0.64

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsUAAGILFIGS
Revenue $4.93B $4.72B $710.08M
Gross profit $2.31B $1.41B $489.29M
Operating income -$119.70M $380.85M $68.19M
Net income -$492.49M -$60.80M $61.92M
Free cash flow -$81.12M $703.50M $97.22M
EPS (diluted) $-1.14 $1.32 $0.32
Cash & equivalents $395.98M $268.30M $108.54M
Total debt $591.16M $3.59B –
Shares (diluted) 431.94M 160.20M 195.14M
Enterprise value -$1.38B $5.34B $2.29B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricUAAGILFIGS
P/E -4.0x 30.6x 56.0x
P/FCF -24.2x 10.6x 33.7x
P/Operating cash flow -132.4x 12.6x 30.4x
P/S 0.4x 1.6x 4.6x
P/B 1.4x 2.2x 7.4x
P/Tangible book 1.4x 21.5x 7.4x
EV/EBITDA -201.9x 16.0x 37.8x
EV/EBIT -18.0x 28.3x 43.8x
EV/Revenue 0.4x 2.3x 4.2x
EV/FCF -26.6x 15.3x 30.7x
EV/Operating cash flow -145.5x 18.2x 27.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.08 -1.41 0.92

Growth

14 metrics
MetricUAAGILFIGS
Revenue growth (1Y) -3.6% 38.0% 24.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -5.7% 14.9% 10.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -6.2% 10.9% 27.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -4.3% 16.6% 9.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) -201.6% -29.8% 583.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -35.1% -13.0% 41.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -585.0% -127.3% 762.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -48.7% -28.5% 64.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -579.6% -16.4% 664.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -49.7% -21.8% 61.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 90.9% 273.6% 116.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -26.5% 32.0% 82.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 74.8% 141.2% 143.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -29.1% 9.4% 98.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricUAAGILFIGS
Gross margin 46.8% 30.0% 68.9%
EBITDA margin -0.2% 14.3% 11.1%
Operating margin -2.4% 8.1% 9.6%
Pretax margin -3.4% 7.6% 10.8%
Net margin -10.0% 4.5% 8.7%
FCF margin -1.6% 14.9% 13.7%
Operating cash flow margin -0.3% 12.6% 15.2%
Return on equity -34.6% 1.5% 14.2%
Return on assets -11.6% 0.5% 10.8%
Return on invested capital -5.2% 5.2% –
Return on capital employed -4.1% 4.8% 14.2%
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.5x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x -9.7x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue 0.9% 0.9% 3.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricUAAGILFIGS
Debt / assets 14.4% 35.7% –
Debt / equity 0.4x 1.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA -18.3x 4.9x –
Debt / FCF -7.3x 5.1x –
Liabilities / assets 65.2% 66.8% 24.1%
Equity / assets 34.8% 33.2% 75.9%
Interest coverage – 1.8x –
Current ratio 1.8x 1.9x 5.0x
Quick ratio 0.8x 0.6x 3.7x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.1x 3.2x
Altman Z-score 1.93 1.65 16.70

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricUAAGILFIGS
Dividend yield – 2.4% –
Net buyback yield 1.2% -3.7% 0.9%
Shareholder yield 1.2% -1.3% 0.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusUAAGILFIGS
Forward P/E 38.2xFY2026 8.4xFY2026 57.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.12FY2026 $4.81FY2026 $0.36FY2026
EPS growth, next FY 0.0%FY2026 +37.0%FY2026 +89.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +58.3% +17.3% 0.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.60BFY2026 $5.67BFY2026 $728.69MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -7.5%FY2026 +56.6%FY2026 +15.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +9.4% +11.5% +18.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersUAAGILFIGS
Held by institutions 100.0% 100.0% 99.1%
Institutions holding 376 463 242
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.7% +7.8% +3.1%
Institutions buying 178 197 139
Institutions selling 120 149 69
Buyers to sellers 1.48 1.32 2.01

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

UAAGILFIGS
UAA 1.00 0.35 0.12
GIL 0.35 1.00 0.15
FIGS 0.12 0.15 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, UAA, GIL and FIGS?

Gildan Activewear (GIL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Under Armour (UAA) $1.99B, Gildan Activewear (GIL) $6.42B, Figs (FIGS) $3.40B.

Which stock is cheaper, UAA, GIL and FIGS?

Gildan Activewear (GIL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Under Armour (UAA) -4.0x, Gildan Activewear (GIL) 30.4x, Figs (FIGS) 55.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Gildan Activewear (GIL) is cheapest (Under Armour (UAA) 38.2x, Gildan Activewear (GIL) 8.4x, Figs (FIGS) 57.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Gildan Activewear (GIL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Under Armour (UAA) -3.6%, Gildan Activewear (GIL) +38.0%, Figs (FIGS) +24.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Figs (FIGS) has the highest net margin (Under Armour (UAA) -10.0%, Gildan Activewear (GIL) 4.5%, Figs (FIGS) 8.7%). On return on invested capital, Gildan Activewear (GIL) leads (Under Armour (UAA) -5.2%, Gildan Activewear (GIL) 5.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Figs (FIGS) returned the most: Under Armour (UAA) -4.8%, Gildan Activewear (GIL) -33.2%, Figs (FIGS) +153.1%. Over five years, Gildan Activewear (GIL) compounded fastest (Under Armour (UAA) -26.8%/yr, Gildan Activewear (GIL) +2.3%/yr, Figs (FIGS) -8.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Gildan Activewear (GIL) has been the steadiest (Under Armour (UAA) 54.2%, Gildan Activewear (GIL) 42.3%, Figs (FIGS) 70.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, UAA, GIL and FIGS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Gildan Activewear (GIL) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.