TTMI vs KTCC vs PLXS Stock Comparison

Ttm Technologies, Key Tronic and Plexus Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
TTMI Ttm Technologies Inc
$90.79 -26.9% 1M +53.3% 1Y
Market cap
$9.57B
P/E
35.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.83B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
7 wins
KTCC Key Tronic Corp
$2.14 +1.9% 1M -38.2% 1Y
Market cap
$23.24M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$386.67M
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
1 win
PLXS Plexus Corp
$239.34 -9.7% 1M +66.6% 1Y
Market cap
$6.38B
P/E
31.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.96B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Ttm Technologies leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Ttm Technologies 7, Plexus 3, Key Tronic 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTTMIKTCCPLXSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.57B $23.24M $6.38B TTMI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 35.7x -0.5x 31.6x PLXS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 17.2x — 28.7x TTMI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +37.6% -17.4% +23.1% TTMI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.0% -12.4% — TTMI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.1% -6.5% — TTMI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.3x -46.7x — KTCC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +53.3% -38.2% +66.6% PLXS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +47.0%/yr -19.8%/yr +22.4%/yr TTMI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 90.5% 60.1% 41.6% PLXS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 27/100 43/100 TTMI

Percentile Scorecard

TTMIKTCCPLXS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTTMIKTCCPLXS
Valuation 62 #43 of 111 64 #41 of 111 46 #60 of 111
Growth 91 #11 of 108 2 #106 of 108 44 #61 of 108
Profitability 61 #41 of 104 25 #78 of 104 54 #48 of 104
Financial Health 27 #84 of 115 16 #97 of 115 25 #86 of 115
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 60 27 43
  • TTMI ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • KTCC ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • PLXS ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTTMIKTCCPLXSSPY
1 month -26.9%+1.9%-9.7% +0.9%
3 months -10.8%-45.5%-0.5% +5.9%
6 months -34.0%-27.5%-4.5% +8.5%
Year to date +31.6%-23.3%+62.8% +13.3%
1 year +53.3%-38.2%+66.6% +12.4%
3 years +688.1%-45.0%+152.8% +88.1%
3 years, per year +99.1%-18.1%+36.3% +23.5%
5 years +585.7%-66.8%+174.1% +68.2%
5 years, per year +47.0%-19.8%+22.4% +11.0%
10 years +571.0%-73.4%+428.0% +263.4%
10 years, per year +21.0%-12.4%+18.1% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureTTMIKTCCPLXSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 90.5%60.1%41.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 97.7%70.9%44.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.820.811.74 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.59-0.631.60 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -66.6%-71.8%-34.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -59.0%-49.8%-21.2% -0.9%
52-week high $221.47$4.26$303.82 $779.14
52-week low $58.45$2.06$132.74 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTTMIKTCCPLXS
P/E now vs peer median 35.7xmedian 33.5x -0.5xmedian 33.5x 31.6xmedian 33.5x
P/S now vs peer median 2.5xmedian 2.8x 0.1xmedian 2.8x 1.3xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.6xmedian 19.6x -52.7xmedian 19.6x —median 19.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 646.9xmedian 29.8x -12.1xmedian 29.8x 117.8xmedian 29.8x
P/B now vs peer median 4.7xmedian 2.9x 0.3xmedian 2.9x 4.1xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 0.16median 1.10 0.00median 1.10 2.18median 1.10

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTTMIKTCCPLXS
Revenue $3.83B $386.67M $4.96B
Gross profit $850.77M $23.94M $502.67M
Operating income $424.51M -$14.72M $263.84M
Net income $268.52M -$47.80M $202.49M
Free cash flow $14.79M -$1.93M –
R&D $32.31M $8.01M –
EPS (diluted) $2.49 $-4.41 $7.42
Cash & equivalents $876.35M $584.00K –
Total debt $1.64B $182.02M –
Shares (diluted) 107.70M 10.84M 27.29M
Enterprise value $7.27B $20.31M $6.38B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTTMIKTCCPLXS
P/E 35.7x -0.5x 31.6x
P/FCF 646.9x -12.1x 117.8x
P/Operating cash flow 28.5x 5.3x 93.6x
P/S 2.5x 0.1x 1.3x
P/B 4.7x 0.3x 4.1x
P/Tangible book 5.3x 0.3x 4.1x
EV/EBITDA 17.6x -52.7x –
EV/EBIT 24.3x -13.9x –
EV/Revenue 2.7x 0.5x 1.3x
EV/FCF 698.8x -106.2x –
EV/Operating cash flow 30.8x 46.3x 93.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.16 0.00 2.18

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTTMIKTCCPLXS
Revenue growth (1Y) 37.6% -17.4% 23.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 17.9% -13.9% 5.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 51.3% -34.3% 23.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 25.9% -20.4% 8.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 120.0% -2,719% 30.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 94.7% -42.6% 10.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 103.5% -474.7% 17.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 230.0% -124.2% 13.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 100.0% -470.7% 18.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 225.7% -124.8% 14.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 6.6% -76.6% -72.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 33.7% -25.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -58.7% -113.0% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 55.0% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTTMIKTCCPLXS
Gross margin 22.2% 6.2% –
EBITDA margin 15.3% -1.0% –
Operating margin 11.1% -3.8% –
Pretax margin 9.0% -6.4% –
Net margin 7.0% -12.4% –
FCF margin 0.4% -0.5% –
Operating cash flow margin 8.8% 1.1% 1.4%
Return on equity 13.5% -55.5% –
Return on assets 5.4% -15.4% –
Return on invested capital 10.1% -6.5% –
Return on capital employed 13.2% -7.2% –
Asset turnover 0.8x 1.2x 1.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x -0.1x 0.3x
Stock comp / revenue 1.9% 0.2% 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTTMIKTCCPLXS
Debt / assets 29.6% 60.7% –
Debt / equity 0.8x 2.6x –
Net debt / EBITDA 1.3x -46.7x –
Debt / FCF 111.2x -94.5x –
Liabilities / assets 63.3% 76.9% 60.0%
Equity / assets 36.7% 23.1% 40.0%
Interest coverage 9.2x -1.5x –
Current ratio 1.7x 2.1x 1.4x
Quick ratio 1.4x 1.0x –
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.0x –
Altman Z-score 3.14 1.75 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTTMIKTCCPLXS
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTTMIKTCCPLXS
Forward P/E 17.2xFY2026 – 28.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.29FY2026 – $8.35FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +115.0%FY2026 – +12.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +53.3% – +26.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.26BFY2026 – $4.60BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +46.4%FY2026 – +14.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +60.2% – +16.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTTMIKTCCPLXS
Held by institutions 92.4% 41.0% 99.7%
Institutions holding 638 26 447
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.6% -4.2% -0.6%
Institutions buying 396 10 245
Institutions selling 202 8 135
Buyers to sellers 1.96 1.25 1.81

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TTMIKTCCPLXS
TTMI 1.00 0.07 0.69
KTCC 0.07 1.00 0.07
PLXS 0.69 0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TTMI, KTCC and PLXS?

Ttm Technologies (TTMI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ttm Technologies (TTMI) $9.57B, Key Tronic (KTCC) $23.24M, Plexus (PLXS) $6.38B.

Which stock is cheaper, TTMI, KTCC and PLXS?

Plexus (PLXS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 35.7x, Key Tronic (KTCC) -0.5x, Plexus (PLXS) 31.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) is cheapest (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 17.2x, Plexus (PLXS) 28.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ttm Technologies (TTMI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +37.6%, Key Tronic (KTCC) -17.4%, Plexus (PLXS) +23.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ttm Technologies (TTMI) has the highest net margin (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 7.0%, Key Tronic (KTCC) -12.4%). On return on invested capital, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) leads (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 10.1%, Key Tronic (KTCC) -6.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Plexus (PLXS) returned the most: Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +53.3%, Key Tronic (KTCC) -38.2%, Plexus (PLXS) +66.6%. Over five years, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) compounded fastest (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +47.0%/yr, Key Tronic (KTCC) -19.8%/yr, Plexus (PLXS) +22.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Plexus (PLXS) has been the steadiest (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 90.5%, Key Tronic (KTCC) 60.1%, Plexus (PLXS) 41.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TTMI, KTCC and PLXS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.