TTMI vs DSWL Stock Comparison

Ttm Technologies and Deswell Industries Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
TTMI Ttm Technologies Inc
$85.50 -33.8% 1M +45.5% 1Y
Market cap
$9.06B
P/E
38.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.38B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
3 wins
DSWL Deswell Industries Inc
$2.98 -3.9% 1M -13.1% 1Y
Market cap
$47.45M
P/E
4.5x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

6 decided of 12

Ttm Technologies leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Ttm Technologies 3, Deswell Industries 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTTMIDSWLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.06B $47.45M TTMI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 38.3x 4.5x DSWL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 16.2x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +27.6% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.0% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.6% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.0x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +45.5% -13.1% TTMI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +44.5%/yr -5.5%/yr TTMI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 90.5% 43.3% DSWL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 95/100 DSWL

Percentile Scorecard

TTMIDSWL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTTMIDSWL
Valuation 51 #55 of 111 97 #4 of 111
Growth 88 #14 of 108 –
Profitability 62 #40 of 104 –
Financial Health 37 #73 of 115 89 #14 of 115
Shareholder Returns – 100 #1 of 81
Overall 59 95
  • TTMI ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • DSWL ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTTMIDSWLSPY
1 month -33.8%-3.9% -0.8%
3 months -30.9%-11.8% +3.5%
6 months -40.7%-12.4% +7.0%
Year to date +23.9%-13.9% +12.2%
1 year +45.5%-13.1% +13.0%
3 years +642.2%+31.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year +95.2%+9.7% +23.1%
5 years +528.7%-24.6% +68.6%
5 years, per year +44.5%-5.5% +11.0%
10 years +652.6%+71.3% +258.0%
10 years, per year +22.4%+5.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureTTMIDSWLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 90.5%43.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 97.7%44.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.810.24 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.50-0.30 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -66.6%-56.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -61.4%-26.6% -1.8%
52-week high $221.47$4.06 $779.14
52-week low $58.45$2.91 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTTMIDSWL
P/E now vs peer median 37.7xmedian 32.0x 4.5xmedian 32.0x
P/S now vs peer median 2.7xmedian 2.8x 0.8xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 19.4xmedian 19.4x —median 19.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -594.9xmedian 29.0x 10.0xmedian 29.0x
P/B now vs peer median 4.7xmedian 2.9x 0.4xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 0.80median 1.13 —median 1.13

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTTMIDSWL
Revenue $3.38B –
Gross profit $715.64M –
Operating income $334.16M –
Net income $236.78M –
Free cash flow -$15.14M –
R&D $29.71M –
EPS (diluted) $2.20 –
Cash & equivalents $507.91M $23.06M
Total debt $3.72B –
Shares (diluted) 107.58M 15.92M
Enterprise value $7.15B -$147.84M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTTMIDSWL
P/E 37.7x 4.5x
P/FCF -594.9x 10.0x
P/Operating cash flow 27.9x –
P/S 2.7x 0.8x
P/B 4.7x 0.4x
P/Tangible book 5.0x 0.4x
EV/EBITDA 19.4x –
EV/EBIT 28.3x –
EV/Revenue 2.8x –
EV/FCF -625.7x –
EV/Operating cash flow 29.3x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.80 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTTMIDSWL
Revenue growth (1Y) 27.6% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.3% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 33.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 18.5% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 94.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 47.1% –
Net income growth (1Y) 154.1% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 48.5% –
EPS growth (1Y) 147.7% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 47.2% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 35.5% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -185.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTTMIDSWL
Gross margin 21.2% –
EBITDA margin 14.5% –
Operating margin 9.9% –
Pretax margin 7.8% –
Net margin 7.0% –
FCF margin -0.4% –
Operating cash flow margin 9.6% –
Return on equity 12.6% –
Return on assets 5.6% –
Return on invested capital 10.6% –
Return on capital employed 11.4% –
Asset turnover 0.8x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.8% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTTMIDSWL
Debt / assets 22.0% –
Debt / equity 0.5x –
Net debt / EBITDA 1.0x –
Debt / FCF -64.3x –
Liabilities / assets 56.2% 15.8%
Equity / assets 43.8% 84.2%
Interest coverage 7.6x –
Current ratio 1.8x 5.2x
Quick ratio 1.4x 3.1x
Cash ratio 0.4x 2.5x
Altman Z-score 3.82 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTTMIDSWL
Dividend yield – 10.1%
Net buyback yield – –
Shareholder yield – 10.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTTMIDSWL
Forward P/E 16.2xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $5.29FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +115.0%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +53.3% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.26BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +46.4%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +60.2% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTTMIDSWL
Held by institutions 92.4% –
Institutions holding 638 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.6% –
Institutions buying 396 –
Institutions selling 202 –
Buyers to sellers 1.96 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TTMIDSWL
TTMI 1.00 0.13
DSWL 0.13 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TTMI and DSWL?

Ttm Technologies (TTMI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ttm Technologies (TTMI) $9.06B, Deswell Industries (DSWL) $47.45M.

Which stock is cheaper, TTMI and DSWL?

Deswell Industries (DSWL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 38.3x, Deswell Industries (DSWL) 4.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ttm Technologies (TTMI) returned the most: Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +45.5%, Deswell Industries (DSWL) -13.1%. Over five years, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) compounded fastest (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +44.5%/yr, Deswell Industries (DSWL) -5.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Deswell Industries (DSWL) has been the steadiest (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 90.5%, Deswell Industries (DSWL) 43.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do TTMI and DSWL move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.13, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, TTMI and DSWL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.