TTMI vs CLS vs BHE Stock Comparison

Ttm Technologies, Celestica and Benchmark Electronics Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
TTMI Ttm Technologies Inc
$85.50 -33.8% 1M +45.5% 1Y
Market cap
$9.06B
P/E
38.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.38B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
2 wins
CLS Celestica Inc
$246.25 -32.6% 1M -17.0% 1Y
Market cap
$33.32B
P/E
26.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.23B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
7 wins
BHE Benchmark Electronics Inc
$66.94 -18.9% 1M +57.7% 1Y
Market cap
$2.54B
P/E
47.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.82B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Celestica leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Celestica 7, Ttm Technologies 2, Benchmark Electronics 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTTMICLSBHELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.06B $33.32B $2.54B CLS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 38.3x 26.7x 47.8x CLS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 16.2x 21.3x 23.2x TTMI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +27.6% +61.6% +8.9% CLS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.0% 6.8% 1.9% TTMI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.6% 25.0% 4.7% CLS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.0x -1.9x -0.9x CLS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +45.5% -17.0% +57.7% BHE
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +44.5%/yr +90.6%/yr +21.7%/yr CLS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 90.5% 79.2% 45.4% BHE
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 62/100 60/100 CLS

Percentile Scorecard

TTMICLSBHE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTTMICLSBHE
Valuation 51 #55 of 111 69 #35 of 111 84 #19 of 111
Growth 88 #14 of 108 91 #11 of 108 53 #51 of 108
Profitability 62 #40 of 104 78 #24 of 104 52 #50 of 104
Financial Health 37 #73 of 115 57 #50 of 115 48 #60 of 115
Shareholder Returns – 16 #68 of 81 63 #31 of 81
Overall 59 62 60
  • TTMI ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • CLS ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • BHE ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTTMICLSBHESPY
1 month -33.8%-32.6%-18.9% -0.8%
3 months -30.9%-22.6%-15.9% +3.5%
6 months -40.7%-41.7%-3.3% +7.0%
Year to date +23.9%-16.7%+56.5% +12.2%
1 year +45.5%-17.0%+57.7% +13.0%
3 years +642.2%+1,000.3%+178.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year +95.2%+122.5%+40.7% +23.1%
5 years +528.7%+2,412.8%+166.6% +68.6%
5 years, per year +44.5%+90.6%+21.7% +11.0%
10 years +652.6%+1,983.3%+163.5% +258.0%
10 years, per year +22.4%+35.5%+10.2% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureTTMICLSBHESPY
Volatility, 1Y 90.5%79.2%45.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 97.7%86.3%47.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.813.351.98 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.50-0.211.27 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -66.6%-54.0%-37.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -61.4%-47.9%-32.2% -1.8%
52-week high $221.47$472.40$98.67 $779.14
52-week low $58.45$246.25$42.15 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTTMICLSBHE
P/E now vs peer median 37.7xmedian 32.0x 23.8xmedian 32.0x 45.2xmedian 32.0x
P/S now vs peer median 2.7xmedian 2.8x 1.7xmedian 2.8x 0.9xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 19.4xmedian 19.4x 16.5xmedian 19.4x 14.7xmedian 19.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -594.9xmedian 29.0x 56.9xmedian 29.0x 18.9xmedian 29.0x
P/B now vs peer median 4.7xmedian 2.9x 5.0xmedian 2.9x 2.2xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 0.80median 1.13 —median 1.13 -5.82median 1.13

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTTMICLSBHE
Revenue $3.38B $18.23B $2.82B
Gross profit $715.64M $2.09B $289.75M
Operating income $334.16M $1.50B $95.93M
Net income $236.78M $1.25B $53.14M
Free cash flow -$15.14M $545.40M $126.98M
R&D $29.71M $168.90M –
EPS (diluted) $2.20 $10.23 $1.46
Cash & equivalents $507.91M $3.96B $314.84M
Total debt $3.72B $818.80M $180.98M
Shares (diluted) 107.58M 121.80M 36.40M
Enterprise value $7.15B $27.85B $1.29B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTTMICLSBHE
P/E 37.7x 23.8x 45.2x
P/FCF -594.9x 56.9x 18.9x
P/Operating cash flow 27.9x 22.1x 13.6x
P/S 2.7x 1.7x 0.9x
P/B 4.7x 5.0x 2.2x
P/Tangible book 5.0x 5.2x 2.2x
EV/EBITDA 19.4x 16.5x 14.7x
EV/EBIT 28.3x 18.5x 23.7x
EV/Revenue 2.8x 1.5x 0.8x
EV/FCF -625.7x 51.2x 17.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 29.3x 19.8x 12.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.80 – -5.82

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTTMICLSBHE
Revenue growth (1Y) 27.6% 61.6% 8.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.3% – -1.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 33.6% 53.8% 10.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 18.5% – 2.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 94.3% 62.0% 7.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 47.1% – -1.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 154.1% 73.8% 46.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 48.5% – -7.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 147.7% 65.4% 46.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 47.2% – -7.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 35.5% 154.8% 55.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 60.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -185.8% 37.0% 57.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 41.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTTMICLSBHE
Gross margin 21.2% 11.5% 10.3%
EBITDA margin 14.5% 9.3% 5.5%
Operating margin 9.9% 8.3% 3.4%
Pretax margin 7.8% 8.0% 3.0%
Net margin 7.0% 6.8% 1.9%
FCF margin -0.4% 3.0% 4.5%
Operating cash flow margin 9.6% 7.7% 6.3%
Return on equity 12.6% 28.7% 4.8%
Return on assets 5.6% 10.0% 2.5%
Return on invested capital 10.6% 25.0% 4.7%
Return on capital employed 11.4% 32.1% 7.1%
Asset turnover 0.8x 1.5x 1.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x 1.1x 3.3x
Stock comp / revenue 1.8% 0.5% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTTMICLSBHE
Debt / assets 22.0% 5.4% 8.2%
Debt / equity 0.5x 0.1x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.0x -1.9x -0.9x
Debt / FCF -64.3x 1.5x 1.4x
Liabilities / assets 56.2% 59.0% 49.6%
Equity / assets 43.8% 41.0% 50.4%
Interest coverage 7.6x 21.3x 6.0x
Current ratio 1.8x 1.6x 2.0x
Quick ratio 1.4x 1.0x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.5x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 3.82 – 3.53

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTTMICLSBHE
Dividend yield – – 1.0%
Net buyback yield – -10.7% 0.7%
Shareholder yield – -10.7% 1.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTTMICLSBHE
Forward P/E 16.2xFY2026 21.3xFY2026 23.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.29FY2026 $11.54FY2026 $2.88FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +115.0%FY2026 +93.3%FY2026 +20.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +53.3% +77.4% +22.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.26BFY2026 $20.07BFY2026 $3.16BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +46.4%FY2026 +64.1%FY2026 +18.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +60.2% +70.3% +9.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTTMICLSBHE
Held by institutions 92.4% 69.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 638 873 331
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.6% +5.0% -0.2%
Institutions buying 396 518 190
Institutions selling 202 272 106
Buyers to sellers 1.96 1.90 1.79

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TTMICLSBHE
TTMI 1.00 0.60 0.74
CLS 0.60 1.00 0.60
BHE 0.74 0.60 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TTMI, CLS and BHE?

Celestica (CLS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ttm Technologies (TTMI) $9.06B, Celestica (CLS) $33.32B, Benchmark Electronics (BHE) $2.54B.

Which stock is cheaper, TTMI, CLS and BHE?

Celestica (CLS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 38.3x, Celestica (CLS) 26.7x, Benchmark Electronics (BHE) 47.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) is cheapest (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 16.2x, Celestica (CLS) 21.3x, Benchmark Electronics (BHE) 23.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Celestica (CLS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +27.6%, Celestica (CLS) +61.6%, Benchmark Electronics (BHE) +8.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ttm Technologies (TTMI) has the highest net margin (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 7.0%, Celestica (CLS) 6.8%, Benchmark Electronics (BHE) 1.9%). On return on invested capital, Celestica (CLS) leads (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 10.6%, Celestica (CLS) 25.0%, Benchmark Electronics (BHE) 4.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Benchmark Electronics (BHE) returned the most: Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +45.5%, Celestica (CLS) -17.0%, Benchmark Electronics (BHE) +57.7%. Over five years, Celestica (CLS) compounded fastest (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +44.5%/yr, Celestica (CLS) +90.6%/yr, Benchmark Electronics (BHE) +21.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Benchmark Electronics (BHE) has been the steadiest (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 90.5%, Celestica (CLS) 79.2%, Benchmark Electronics (BHE) 45.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TTMI, CLS and BHE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Celestica (CLS) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.