TS vs PKOH vs CVR Stock Comparison

Tenaris, Park Ohio Holdings and Chicago Rivet & Machine Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (LXFR) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
TS Tenaris Sa
$56.41 -0.8% 1M +40.6% 1Y
Market cap
$62.09B
P/E
31.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$12.16B
Div. yield
–
Metal Fabrication Industrials
7 wins
PKOH Park Ohio Holdings Corp
$39.61 -18.6% 1M +88.0% 1Y
Market cap
$605.50M
P/E
17.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.71B
Div. yield
–
Metal Fabrication Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Tenaris leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Tenaris 7, Park Ohio Holdings 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTSPKOHCVRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $62.09B $605.50M $10.15M TS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 31.4x 17.3x -4.2x PKOH
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.2x 11.6x — PKOH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +2.8% +7.7% +7.1% PKOH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 16.2% 2.0% -8.9% TS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 13.0% 6.4% -11.3% TS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -3.5x 5.3x -0.7x TS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +40.6% +88.0% +11.1% PKOH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +18.0%/yr +9.2%/yr -18.0%/yr TS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 28.9% 45.4% 58.1% TS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 55/100 41/100 TS

Percentile Scorecard

TSPKOHCVR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTSPKOHCVR
Valuation 40 #122 of 204 87 #27 of 204 37 #130 of 204
Growth 16 #161 of 191 88 #24 of 191 66 #65 of 191
Profitability 80 #39 of 189 40 #114 of 189 14 #162 of 189
Financial Health 98 #5 of 221 14 #191 of 221 77 #52 of 221
Shareholder Returns 61 #63 of 159 46 #86 of 159 12 #140 of 159
Overall 59 55 41
  • TS ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • PKOH ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • CVR ranked among 223 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTSPKOHCVRSPY
1 month -0.8%-18.6%-7.8% -5.9%
3 months +5.6%-14.8%-3.7% -4.6%
6 months -4.3%+28.4%-8.3% +0.2%
Year to date +46.7%+89.2%-28.1% +7.5%
1 year +40.6%+88.0%+11.1% +8.2%
3 years +59.4%+55.6%-42.8% +68.3%
3 years, per year +16.8%+15.9%-17.0% +19.0%
5 years +128.3%+55.4%-62.9% +56.5%
5 years, per year +18.0%+9.2%-18.0% +9.4%
10 years +97.7%+28.6%-67.1% +251.5%
10 years, per year +7.1%+2.5%-10.5% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureTSPKOHCVRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 28.9%45.4%58.1% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 30.0%45.8%62.0% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.281.380.44 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.411.940.19 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.7%-61.8%-71.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.9%-24.6%-31.8% -5.9%
52-week high $64.02$52.51$14.66 $779.14
52-week low $37.76$18.74$8.71 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTSPKOHCVR
P/E now vs peer median 30.1xmedian 23.4x 15.9xmedian 23.4x -4.0xmedian 23.4x
P/S now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 1.7x 0.3xmedian 1.7x 0.4xmedian 1.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.7xmedian 13.4x 10.4xmedian 13.4x -9.6xmedian 13.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 22.0xmedian 21.9x 27.3xmedian 21.9x -6.8xmedian 21.9x
P/B now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 2.1x 1.4xmedian 2.1x 0.6xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.02 0.09median 1.02 0.04median 1.02

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTSPKOHCVR
Revenue $12.16B $1.71B $27.43M
Gross profit $4.12B $302.10M $3.01M
Operating income $2.23B $80.80M -$2.26M
Net income $2.04B $34.90M -$2.44M
Free cash flow $2.75B $21.00M -$1.42M
EPS (diluted) – $2.44 $-2.53
Cash & equivalents $9.55B $58.90M $770.75K
Total debt -$336.57M $660.40M $1.50M
Shares (diluted) – 14.30M 966.13K
Enterprise value $33.35B $406.80M $4.54M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTSPKOHCVR
P/E 30.1x 15.9x -4.0x
P/FCF 22.0x 27.3x -6.8x
P/Operating cash flow 26.4x 8.7x -9.7x
P/S 5.0x 0.3x 0.4x
P/B 3.5x 1.4x 0.6x
P/Tangible book 3.5x 1.4x 0.6x
EV/EBITDA 17.7x 10.4x -9.6x
EV/EBIT 22.7x 14.5x -4.6x
EV/Revenue 4.2x 0.7x 0.4x
EV/FCF 18.4x 55.9x -7.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 22.1x 17.9x -10.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.09 0.04

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTSPKOHCVR
Revenue growth (1Y) 2.8% 7.7% 7.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -6.9% 1.2% -5.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 2.2% 13.0% 96.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -13.9% 4.8% 65.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) -2.6% 14.3% 48.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -20.9% 5.4% -103.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 0.4% 49.8% 51.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -17.4% 182.4% -104.6%
EPS growth (1Y) – 46.6% 51.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 171.8% -104.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -0.7% 228.0% 53.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -17.6% 38.5% 31.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -7.9% 225.7% 42.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -16.1% 108.0% 32.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTSPKOHCVR
Gross margin 33.9% 17.6% 11.0%
EBITDA margin 23.5% 6.6% -4.0%
Operating margin 18.3% 4.7% -8.3%
Pretax margin 20.6% 2.3% -8.3%
Net margin 16.2% 2.0% -8.9%
FCF margin 22.6% 1.2% -5.2%
Operating cash flow margin 18.8% 3.8% -3.6%
Return on equity 11.9% 8.8% -12.1%
Return on assets 9.9% 2.3% -9.1%
Return on invested capital 13.0% 6.4% -11.3%
Return on capital employed 11.0% 7.3% -11.6%
Asset turnover 0.6x 1.2x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 1.9x 0.4x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.3% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTSPKOHCVR
Debt / assets -1.6% 43.9% 6.4%
Debt / equity 0.0x 1.6x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA -3.5x 5.3x -0.7x
Debt / FCF -0.1x 31.4x -1.1x
Liabilities / assets 18.2% 73.3% 26.0%
Equity / assets 81.8% 26.7% 74.0%
Interest coverage 43.8x 1.6x –
Current ratio – 2.4x 3.0x
Quick ratio 34.6x 1.1x 1.4x
Cash ratio 28.4x 0.2x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – – 3.41

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTSPKOHCVR
Dividend yield 3.2% 1.3% 0.6%
Net buyback yield -1.0% – –
Shareholder yield 2.1% 1.3% 0.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – -3.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – -6.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – -52.6%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – -53.2%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTSPKOHCVR
Forward P/E 14.2xFY2026 11.6xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $3.97FY2026 $3.41FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +8.5%FY2026 +26.3%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +1.3% +13.2% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $12.98BFY2026 $1.78BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +8.3%FY2026 +11.5%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after -6.2% +5.8% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTSPKOHCVR
Held by institutions 3.6% 55.8% 13.4%
Institutions holding 285 104 9
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.4% +6.4% -10.4%
Institutions buying 154 58 2
Institutions selling 80 27 2
Buyers to sellers 1.93 2.15 1.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TSPKOHCVR
TS 1.00 0.01 0.05
PKOH 0.01 1.00 0.09
CVR 0.05 0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TS, PKOH and CVR?

Tenaris (TS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Tenaris (TS) $62.09B, Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) $605.50M, Chicago Rivet & Machine (CVR) $10.15M.

Which stock is cheaper, TS, PKOH and CVR?

Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Tenaris (TS) 31.4x, Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) 17.3x, Chicago Rivet & Machine (CVR) -4.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) is cheapest (Tenaris (TS) 14.2x, Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) 11.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Tenaris (TS) +2.8%, Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) +7.7%, Chicago Rivet & Machine (CVR) +7.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Tenaris (TS) has the highest net margin (Tenaris (TS) 16.2%, Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) 2.0%, Chicago Rivet & Machine (CVR) -8.9%). On return on invested capital, Tenaris (TS) leads (Tenaris (TS) 13.0%, Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) 6.4%, Chicago Rivet & Machine (CVR) -11.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) returned the most: Tenaris (TS) +40.6%, Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) +88.0%, Chicago Rivet & Machine (CVR) +11.1%. Over five years, Tenaris (TS) compounded fastest (Tenaris (TS) +18.0%/yr, Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) +9.2%/yr, Chicago Rivet & Machine (CVR) -18.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Tenaris (TS) 0.00%, Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) 0.00%, Chicago Rivet & Machine (CVR) 0.01%. Tenaris (TS) and Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Tenaris (TS) has been the steadiest (Tenaris (TS) 28.9%, Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) 45.4%, Chicago Rivet & Machine (CVR) 58.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TS, PKOH and CVR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Tenaris (TS) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.