TRTN-PA vs LINE vs POWL Stock Comparison

Triton International, Lineage and Powell Industries Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LINE Lineage, Inc.
$38.61 +10.4% 1M +2.3% 1Y
Market cap
$8.80B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$5.37B
Div. yield
5.48%
Industrial REITs Real Estate
3 wins
POWL Powell Industries Inc
$143.10 -27.7% 1M +12.9% 1Y
Market cap
$5.21B
P/E
27.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.16B
Div. yield
0.21%
Electrical Equipment Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Triton International leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Triton International 4, Lineage 3, Powell Industries 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTRTN-PALINEPOWLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.50B $8.80B $5.21B LINE
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 3.6x -52.1x 27.3x TRTN-PA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 27.7x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +36.3% +1.0% +7.0% TRTN-PA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 528.7% -3.1% 16.5% TRTN-PA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.7% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 5.6x 5.5x — LINE
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 5.48% 0.21% LINE
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -3.7% +2.3% +12.9% POWL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.5%/yr — +72.9%/yr POWL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 8.3% 36.9% 65.6% TRTN-PA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 43/100 63/100 72/100 POWL

Percentile Scorecard

TRTN-PALINEPOWL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTRTN-PALINEPOWL
Valuation 90 #21 of 204 82 #27 of 146 50 #103 of 204
Growth 21 #151 of 191 74 #39 of 145 92 #17 of 191
Profitability 64 #69 of 189 26 #105 of 141 97 #6 of 189
Financial Health 8 #204 of 221 57 #64 of 146 76 #54 of 221
Shareholder Returns 34 #105 of 159 78 #31 of 136 47 #85 of 159
Overall 43 63 72
  • TRTN-PA ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • LINE ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • POWL ranked among 223 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTRTN-PALINEPOWLSPY
1 month -2.8%+10.4%-27.7% -1.0%
3 months -5.0%-6.1%-31.3% -0.4%
6 months -4.8%+2.1%-55.3% +4.5%
Year to date -3.4%+10.3%+34.7% +12.4%
1 year -3.7%+2.3%+12.9% +13.6%
3 years -2.7%—+436.0% +76.4%
3 years, per year -0.9%—+75.1% +20.8%
5 years -11.8%—+1,442.0% +63.7%
5 years, per year -2.5%—+72.9% +10.4%
10 years ——+1,101.2% +267.7%
10 years, per year ——+28.2% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureTRTN-PALINEPOWLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 8.3%36.9%65.6% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 9.9%33.0%70.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.101.012.34 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.440.060.20 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -15.2%-64.1%-55.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -6.3%-14.4%-55.6% -1.6%
52-week high $26.42$45.10$322.05 $779.14
52-week low $24.58$31.80$94.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTRTN-PALINEPOWL
P/E now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 25.5x -52.1xmedian 26.6x 27.3xmedian 25.5x
P/S now vs peer median 34.8xmedian 1.9x 1.6xmedian 4.3x 4.5xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.8xmedian 14.4x 13.4xmedian 14.7x 19.4xmedian 14.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 23.3x 36.1xmedian 22.1x 21.4xmedian 23.3x
P/B now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 2.2x 1.0xmedian 1.3x 6.9xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -0.26median 1.16 —median 2.01 0.38median 1.16

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTRTN-PALINEPOWL
Revenue $72.04M $5.37B $1.16B
Gross profit $1.86M $1.72B $348.18M
Operating income $754.49M $192.00M $227.67M
Net income $837.82M -$189.00M $190.86M
Free cash flow $499.45M $244.00M $243.96M
R&D – – $14.98M
EPS (diluted) $6.91 $-0.74 $5.21
Cash & equivalents $62.50M $58.00M $633.56M
Total debt $6.35B $6.22B –
Shares (diluted) 55.10M 228.00M 36.60M
Enterprise value $2.29B $9.52B $3.06B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTRTN-PALINEPOWL
P/E 3.6x -52.1x 27.3x
P/FCF 5.0x 36.1x 21.4x
P/Operating cash flow 2.8x 8.9x 20.4x
P/S 34.8x 1.6x 4.5x
P/B 0.9x 1.0x 6.9x
P/Tangible book 0.9x 1.1x 6.9x
EV/EBITDA 7.8x 13.4x 19.4x
EV/EBIT 11.7x 78.0x 20.1x
EV/Revenue 122.1x 2.8x 4.0x
EV/FCF 17.6x 61.3x 18.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.7x 15.2x 17.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.26 – 0.38

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTRTN-PALINEPOWL
Revenue growth (1Y) 36.3% 1.0% 7.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -13.5% – 21.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -44.5% 0.0% 11.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -39.7% – 39.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) -16.1% 142.0% 8.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -7.3% – 74.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -10.8% 70.0% 8.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 9.0% – 73.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -28.0% 69.8% 8.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -13.8% – 72.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -17.1% 17.5% 153.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -14.7% – 25.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 17.0% 45.2% 201.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -24.1% – 25.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTRTN-PALINEPOWL
Gross margin 2.6% 32.0% 30.1%
EBITDA margin 1,563% 20.9% 20.4%
Operating margin 1,047% 3.6% 19.7%
Pretax margin 677.9% -3.5% 21.2%
Net margin 528.7% -3.1% 16.5%
FCF margin 693.3% 4.5% 21.1%
Operating cash flow margin 1,252% 18.4% 22.1%
Return on equity 31.1% -2.1% 26.1%
Return on assets 8.6% -1.0% 14.8%
Return on invested capital 7.7% – –
Return on capital employed – 1.1% 34.0%
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.3x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x -5.2x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 20.1% 2.0% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTRTN-PALINEPOWL
Debt / assets 65.3% 32.9% –
Debt / equity 2.3x 0.7x –
Net debt / EBITDA 5.6x 5.5x –
Debt / FCF 12.7x 25.5x –
Liabilities / assets 71.8% 53.0% 46.2%
Equity / assets 28.2% 47.0% 53.8%
Interest coverage 2.8x – –
Current ratio – 0.8x 2.0x
Quick ratio – 0.6x 1.8x
Cash ratio – 0.0x 1.0x
Altman Z-score – 0.62 7.44

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTRTN-PALINEPOWL
Dividend yield 0.0% 5.5% 0.2%
Net buyback yield -6.7% – –
Shareholder yield -6.7% 5.5% 0.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) 5.4% – 6.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) 9.1% – 5.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) 87.2% – 1.6%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -31.8% – 1.8%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTRTN-PALINEPOWL
Forward P/E – – 27.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $-0.77FY2026 $5.17FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +4.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +26.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $5.07BFY2026 $1.24BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – -5.4%FY2026 +12.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +4.1% +26.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTRTN-PALINEPOWL
Held by institutions – 33.7% 75.0%
Institutions holding – 328 583
Change in shares held, QoQ – +18.2% -4.3%
Institutions buying – 183 320
Institutions selling – 93 215
Buyers to sellers – 1.97 1.49

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TRTN-PALINEPOWL
TRTN-PA 1.00 0.05 0.05
LINE 0.05 1.00 0.03
POWL 0.05 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TRTN-PA, LINE and POWL?

Lineage (LINE) is the largest by market capitalisation: Triton International (TRTN-PA) $2.50B, Lineage (LINE) $8.80B, Powell Industries (POWL) $5.21B.

Which stock is cheaper, TRTN-PA, LINE and POWL?

Triton International (TRTN-PA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Triton International (TRTN-PA) 3.6x, Lineage (LINE) -52.1x, Powell Industries (POWL) 27.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Triton International (TRTN-PA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Triton International (TRTN-PA) +36.3%, Lineage (LINE) +1.0%, Powell Industries (POWL) +7.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Triton International (TRTN-PA) has the highest net margin (Triton International (TRTN-PA) 528.7%, Lineage (LINE) -3.1%, Powell Industries (POWL) 16.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Powell Industries (POWL) returned the most: Triton International (TRTN-PA) -3.7%, Lineage (LINE) +2.3%, Powell Industries (POWL) +12.9%. Over five years, Powell Industries (POWL) compounded fastest (Triton International (TRTN-PA) -2.5%/yr, Powell Industries (POWL) +72.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Lineage (LINE) has the highest dividend yield: Triton International (TRTN-PA) 0.00%, Lineage (LINE) 5.48%, Powell Industries (POWL) 0.21%. Triton International (TRTN-PA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Triton International (TRTN-PA) has been the steadiest (Triton International (TRTN-PA) 8.3%, Lineage (LINE) 36.9%, Powell Industries (POWL) 65.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TRTN-PA, LINE and POWL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Triton International (TRTN-PA) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.