TRON vs KRFG vs JAKK Stock Comparison

Tron, King Resources and Jakks Pacific Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
TRON Tron Inc.
$1.53 +8.5% 1M -45.2% 1Y
Market cap
$419.80M
P/E
209.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.84M
Div. yield
–
Toys Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
KRFG King Resources, Inc.
$0.23 0.0% 1M +130.0% 1Y
Market cap
$2.50M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Toys Consumer Discretionary
1 win
JAKK Jakks Pacific Inc
$32.49 +28.7% 1M +73.8% 1Y
Market cap
$374.26M
P/E
14.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$169.83M
Div. yield
3.08%
Toys Consumer Discretionary
4 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Jakks Pacific leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Jakks Pacific 4, Tron 3, King Resources 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTRONKRFGJAKKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $419.80M $2.50M $374.26M TRON
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 209.1x — 14.2x JAKK
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 13.1x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.0% — -70.4% TRON
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 41.6% — 15.4% TRON
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 3.08% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -45.2% +130.0% +73.8% KRFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -71.1%/yr +25.4%/yr JAKK
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 96.8% 182.0% 40.0% JAKK
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 — 62/100 JAKK

Percentile Scorecard

TRONKRFGJAKK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTRONKRFGJAKK
Valuation 21 #27 of 34 3 #33 of 34 73 #10 of 34
Growth 71 #10 of 32 13 #28 of 32 32 #22 of 32
Profitability 26 #24 of 32 – 90 #4 of 32
Financial Health 94 #3 of 33 – 50 #17 of 33
Shareholder Returns – – 65 #7 of 18
Overall 53 – 62
  • TRON ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products
  • KRFG ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products
  • JAKK ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTRONKRFGJAKKSPY
1 month +8.5%0.0%+28.7% +0.9%
3 months +4.8%-8.0%+22.6% +5.9%
6 months -23.5%-60.3%+51.1% +8.5%
Year to date +23.4%-70.9%+92.5% +13.3%
1 year -45.2%+130.0%+73.8% +12.4%
3 years +1.3%-93.4%+101.6% +88.1%
3 years, per year +0.4%-59.7%+26.3% +23.5%
5 years —-99.8%+209.7% +68.2%
5 years, per year —-71.1%+25.4% +11.0%
10 years —-77.0%-50.4% +263.4%
10 years, per year —-13.7%-6.8% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureTRONKRFGJAKKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 96.8%182.0%40.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 87.3%237.3%29.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.71-1.150.87 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.470.711.85 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -94.3%-100.0%-58.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -45.2%-76.0%0.0% -0.9%
52-week high $2.79$0.96$32.49 $779.14
52-week low $1.10$0.08$15.01 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTRONKRFGJAKK
P/E now vs peer median 209.1xmedian 17.7x —median 17.7x 14.2xmedian 17.7x
P/S now vs peer median 86.8xmedian 1.1x —median 1.1x 2.2xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -187.5xmedian 9.6x —median 9.6x 9.9xmedian 9.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median -236.4xmedian 10.5x -15.9xmedian 10.5x 10.5xmedian 10.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 1.4x —median 1.4x 1.3xmedian 1.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.32 —median 0.32 -0.40median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTRONKRFGJAKK
Revenue $4.84M – $169.83M
Gross profit $1.25M – $201.47M
Operating income -$2.47M – $23.05M
Net income $5.46M -$2.84M $26.16M
Free cash flow -$1.78M -$157.31K $35.74M
EPS (diluted) $0.00 – $2.17
Cash & equivalents $9.92M – $44.00M
Shares (diluted) 476.45M 10.88M 12.05M
Enterprise value $383.53M $2.50M $155.70M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTRONKRFGJAKK
P/E 209.1x – 14.2x
P/FCF -236.4x -15.9x 10.5x
P/Operating cash flow -236.4x -15.9x 7.4x
P/S 86.8x – 2.2x
P/B 1.7x – 1.3x
P/Tangible book 1.7x – 1.3x
EV/EBITDA -187.5x – 9.9x
EV/EBIT -166.2x – 14.3x
EV/Revenue 84.8x – 1.9x
EV/FCF -230.8x -15.9x 9.2x
EV/Operating cash flow -230.8x -15.9x 6.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – -0.40

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTRONKRFGJAKK
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.0% – -70.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – -38.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 30.4% – 11.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – -2.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 24.5% – 184.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – -26.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 266.8% -257.5% 330.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -30.6% -33.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 102.2% – 308.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – -35.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 6.2% -72.4% 72.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 30.2% -19.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 6.2% -72.4% 102.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 30.2% -26.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTRONKRFGJAKK
Gross margin 25.8% – 118.6%
EBITDA margin -45.2% – 19.7%
Operating margin -51.0% – 13.6%
Pretax margin 98.3% – 18.6%
Net margin 41.6% – 15.4%
FCF margin -36.7% – 21.0%
Operating cash flow margin -36.7% – 29.8%
Return on equity -7.8% – 10.0%
Return on assets -7.7% – 5.4%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -1.1% – 8.5%
Asset turnover 0.0x – 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.3x 0.1x 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue – – 7.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTRONKRFGJAKK
Debt / assets – – –
Debt / equity – – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 1.1% – 47.6%
Equity / assets 98.9% – 52.4%
Interest coverage -65.4x – 94.5x
Current ratio 30.9x – 1.7x
Quick ratio 12.5x – 1.3x
Cash ratio 11.5x – 0.2x
Altman Z-score 91.39 – 1.64

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTRONKRFGJAKK
Dividend yield – – 3.1%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – 3.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTRONKRFGJAKK
Forward P/E – – 13.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – – $2.48FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +53.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +48.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year – – $583.90MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – +2.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – +18.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTRONKRFGJAKK
Held by institutions 2.3% – 60.3%
Institutions holding 56 – 105
Change in shares held, QoQ +60.3% – -0.6%
Institutions buying 44 – 47
Institutions selling 10 – 38
Buyers to sellers 4.40 – 1.24

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TRONKRFGJAKK
TRON 1.00 -0.11 0.05
KRFG -0.11 1.00 0.06
JAKK 0.05 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TRON, KRFG and JAKK?

Tron (TRON) is the largest by market capitalisation: Tron (TRON) $419.80M, King Resources (KRFG) $2.50M, Jakks Pacific (JAKK) $374.26M.

Which stock is cheaper, TRON, KRFG and JAKK?

Jakks Pacific (JAKK) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Tron (TRON) 209.1x, Jakks Pacific (JAKK) 14.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Tron (TRON) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Tron (TRON) +10.0%, Jakks Pacific (JAKK) -70.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Tron (TRON) has the highest net margin (Tron (TRON) 41.6%, Jakks Pacific (JAKK) 15.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year King Resources (KRFG) returned the most: Tron (TRON) -45.2%, King Resources (KRFG) +130.0%, Jakks Pacific (JAKK) +73.8%. Over five years, Jakks Pacific (JAKK) compounded fastest (King Resources (KRFG) -71.1%/yr, Jakks Pacific (JAKK) +25.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Jakks Pacific (JAKK) 3.08%. Tron (TRON) and King Resources (KRFG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Jakks Pacific (JAKK) has been the steadiest (Tron (TRON) 96.8%, King Resources (KRFG) 182.0%, Jakks Pacific (JAKK) 40.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TRON, KRFG and JAKK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Jakks Pacific (JAKK) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.