TRON vs FEBO vs KMRK Stock Comparison

Tron, Fenbo Holdings and K-Tech Solutions Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
TRON Tron Inc.
$1.35 -4.3% 1M -44.0% 1Y
Market cap
$385.86M
P/E
192.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.84M
Div. yield
–
Toys Consumer Discretionary
1 win
FEBO Fenbo Holdings Ltd
$0.79 +25.4% 1M +5.3% 1Y
Market cap
$8.74M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Home Appliances Consumer Discretionary
1 win
KMRK K-Tech Solutions Co Ltd
$1.51 +31.3% 1M +41.1% 1Y
Market cap
$33.34M
P/E
185.9x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Toys Consumer Discretionary
2 wins

Head to Head

4 decided of 12

K-Tech Solutions leads on 2 of the 12 questions below (K-Tech Solutions 2, Tron 1, Fenbo Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTRONFEBOKMRKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $385.86M $8.74M $33.34M TRON
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 192.0x — 185.9x KMRK
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.0% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 41.6% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -44.0% +5.3% +41.1% KMRK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 96.4% 92.2% 122.1% FEBO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 — — –

Percentile Scorecard

TRONFEBOKMRK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTRONFEBOKMRK
Valuation 33 #23 of 34 – 21 #27 of 34
Growth 77 #8 of 32 – –
Profitability 23 #25 of 32 – –
Financial Health 94 #3 of 33 55 #20 of 43 72 #10 of 33
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 57 – –
  • TRON ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products
  • FEBO ranked among 44 companies in Household Durables
  • KMRK ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTRONFEBOKMRKSPY
1 month -4.3%+25.4%+31.3% -2.0%
3 months -8.8%-12.2%+32.5% -2.2%
6 months -46.6%-30.4%-44.1% +4.2%
Year to date +8.9%-40.6%+16.2% +10.6%
1 year -44.0%+5.3%+41.1% +10.4%
3 years -28.6%—— +73.6%
3 years, per year -10.6%—— +20.2%

Risk

MeasureTRONFEBOKMRKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 96.4%92.2%122.1% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 87.5%95.7%123.9% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.730.53-0.74 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.460.060.34 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -94.3%-96.2%-83.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -49.6%-43.6%-64.1% -3.2%
52-week high $2.68$1.40$4.21 $779.14
52-week low $1.10$0.63$0.84 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTRONFEBOKMRK
P/E now vs peer median 184.5xmedian 18.7x —median 15.2x 185.9xmedian 18.7x
P/S now vs peer median 76.6xmedian 1.1x —median 0.7x 2.0xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -164.9xmedian 9.6x —median 9.8x —median 9.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median -208.6xmedian 11.9x —median 11.6x 37.6xmedian 11.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 1.5x 2.2xmedian 1.2x 4.5xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.24 —median 0.61 —median 1.24

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTRONFEBOKMRK
Revenue $4.84M – –
Gross profit $1.25M – –
Operating income -$2.47M – –
Net income $5.46M – –
Free cash flow -$1.78M – –
EPS (diluted) $0.00 – –
Cash & equivalents $9.92M $2.09M $9.15M
Total debt – $1.33M $844.30K
Shares (diluted) 476.45M 11.06M 21.10M
Enterprise value $349.58M -$2.94M $6.94M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTRONFEBOKMRK
P/E 184.5x – 185.9x
P/FCF -208.6x – 37.6x
P/Operating cash flow -208.6x – –
P/S 76.6x – 2.0x
P/B 1.5x 2.2x 4.5x
P/Tangible book 1.5x 2.2x 4.5x
EV/EBITDA -164.9x – –
EV/EBIT -146.1x – –
EV/Revenue 74.6x – –
EV/FCF -203.0x – –
EV/Operating cash flow -203.0x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTRONFEBOKMRK
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.0% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 30.4% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 24.5% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 266.8% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – –
EPS growth (1Y) 102.2% – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 6.2% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 6.2% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTRONFEBOKMRK
Gross margin 25.8% – –
EBITDA margin -45.2% – –
Operating margin -51.0% – –
Pretax margin 98.3% – –
Net margin 41.6% – –
FCF margin -36.7% – –
Operating cash flow margin -36.7% – –
Return on equity -7.8% – –
Return on assets -7.7% – –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -1.1% – –
Asset turnover 0.0x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.3x – –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTRONFEBOKMRK
Debt / assets – 15.2% 8.0%
Debt / equity – 0.3x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 1.1% 54.8% 32.7%
Equity / assets 98.9% 45.2% 67.3%
Interest coverage -65.4x – –
Current ratio 30.9x 1.6x 3.7x
Quick ratio 12.5x 1.2x 3.7x
Cash ratio 11.5x 0.4x 3.3x
Altman Z-score 80.65 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTRONFEBOKMRK
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTRONFEBOKMRK

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTRONFEBOKMRK
Held by institutions 2.3% – –
Institutions holding 56 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ +60.3% – –
Institutions buying 44 – –
Institutions selling 10 – –
Buyers to sellers 4.40 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TRONFEBOKMRK
TRON 1.00 -0.09 0.01
FEBO -0.09 1.00 0.00
KMRK 0.01 0.00 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TRON, FEBO and KMRK?

Tron (TRON) is the largest by market capitalisation: Tron (TRON) $385.86M, Fenbo Holdings (FEBO) $8.74M, K-Tech Solutions (KMRK) $33.34M.

Which stock is cheaper, TRON, FEBO and KMRK?

K-Tech Solutions (KMRK) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Tron (TRON) 192.0x, K-Tech Solutions (KMRK) 185.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year K-Tech Solutions (KMRK) returned the most: Tron (TRON) -44.0%, Fenbo Holdings (FEBO) +5.3%, K-Tech Solutions (KMRK) +41.1%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Fenbo Holdings (FEBO) has been the steadiest (Tron (TRON) 96.4%, Fenbo Holdings (FEBO) 92.2%, K-Tech Solutions (KMRK) 122.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TRON, FEBO and KMRK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, K-Tech Solutions (KMRK) leads on 2. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.