TRNO vs COLD vs OMAB Stock Comparison

Terreno Realty, Americold Realty Trust and Central North Airport Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
TRNO Terreno Realty Corp
$65.09 -1.6% 1M +6.5% 1Y
Market cap
$6.80B
P/E
17.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$502.88M
Div. yield
0.03%
Industrial REITs Real Estate
6 wins
COLD Americold Realty Trust
$14.38 -2.5% 1M +2.1% 1Y
Market cap
$4.06B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.61B
Div. yield
0.07%
Industrial REITs Real Estate
1 win

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Terreno Realty leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Terreno Realty 6, Central North Airport 3, Americold Realty Trust 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTRNOCOLDOMABLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.80B $4.06B $4.73B TRNO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 17.6x -8.9x 16.1x OMAB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 31.6x — 15.0x OMAB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +18.0% -0.2% — TRNO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 76.9% -17.4% — TRNO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -4.6% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 67.3x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.03% 0.07% 0.00% COLD
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +6.5% +2.1% -3.4% TRNO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.5%/yr -13.6%/yr +15.3%/yr OMAB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 19.7% 44.0% 31.1% TRNO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 55/100 22/100 46/100 TRNO

Percentile Scorecard

TRNOCOLDOMAB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTRNOCOLDOMAB
Valuation 7 #135 of 145 18 #119 of 145 30 #96 of 136
Growth 89 #17 of 141 4 #135 of 141 –
Profitability 28 #97 of 134 13 #117 of 134 –
Financial Health 98 #4 of 138 13 #120 of 138 35 #94 of 143
Shareholder Returns 53 #62 of 131 62 #50 of 131 74 #22 of 82
Overall 55 22 46
  • TRNO ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • COLD ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • OMAB ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTRNOCOLDOMABSPY
1 month -1.6%-2.5%-3.9% -0.2%
3 months -10.8%-1.4%-8.5% +3.9%
6 months -1.5%+15.3%-6.4% +8.2%
Year to date +10.9%+11.8%-8.9% +12.9%
1 year +6.5%+2.1%-3.4% +12.3%
3 years +27.8%-43.2%+74.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year +8.5%-17.2%+20.4% +23.3%
5 years -11.8%-51.9%+103.7% +67.9%
5 years, per year -2.5%-13.6%+15.3% +10.9%
10 years +155.1%—+105.1% +261.1%
10 years, per year +9.8%—+7.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureTRNOCOLDOMABSPY
Volatility, 1Y 19.7%44.0%31.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 20.1%39.3%28.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.350.711.12 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.330.05-0.11 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -40.6%-70.0%-42.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -13.3%-11.5%-26.6% -1.2%
52-week high $75.07$16.25$134.98 $779.14
52-week low $57.13$10.12$88.75 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTRNOCOLDOMAB
P/E now vs peer median 17.9xmedian 26.3x -9.0xmedian 26.3x 16.1xmedian 16.3x
P/S now vs peer median 13.9xmedian 4.0x 1.6xmedian 4.0x 5.4xmedian 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.4x 133.0xmedian 14.4x —median 8.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -10.2xmedian 23.3x -21.8xmedian 23.3x 11.8xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 1.3x 1.7xmedian 1.3x 7.5xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.64median 1.91 0.16median 1.91 —median 0.82

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTRNOCOLDOMAB
Revenue $502.88M $2.61B –
Gross profit – $830.08M –
Operating income – -$326.12M –
Net income $388.59M -$460.51M –
Free cash flow -$686.58M -$187.93M –
EPS (diluted) $3.63 $-1.59 –
Cash & equivalents $51.21M $40.47M $172.32M
Total debt $3.85B $4.24B $1.84B
Shares (diluted) 106.67M 286.88M –
Enterprise value $6.61B $3.81B $4.21B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTRNOCOLDOMAB
P/E 17.9x -9.0x 16.1x
P/FCF -10.2x -21.8x 11.8x
P/Operating cash flow 24.5x 11.8x –
P/S 13.9x 1.6x 5.4x
P/B 1.6x 1.7x 7.5x
P/Tangible book 1.6x 2.5x -9.6x
EV/EBITDA – 133.0x –
EV/EBIT – -25.5x –
EV/Revenue 15.7x 3.2x –
EV/FCF -11.5x -44.2x –
EV/Operating cash flow 27.6x 23.8x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.64 0.16 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTRNOCOLDOMAB
Revenue growth (1Y) 18.0% -0.2% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 18.7% -2.3% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -0.9% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 3.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – -514.8% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -70.8% –
Net income growth (1Y) 52.9% -736.3% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 38.9% -59.6% –
EPS growth (1Y) 47.6% -729.3% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 27.8% -56.0% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 17.8% -4.0% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 19.6% 11.8% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -78.6% -48.2% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -16.2% -232.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTRNOCOLDOMAB
Gross margin – 31.7% –
EBITDA margin – 2.4% –
Operating margin – -12.5% –
Pretax margin – -18.0% –
Net margin 76.9% -17.4% –
FCF margin -136.5% -7.2% –
Operating cash flow margin 57.0% 13.4% –
Return on equity – -17.3% –
Return on assets – -5.8% –
Return on invested capital – -4.6% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.3x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x -0.8x –
Stock comp / revenue 3.6% 1.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTRNOCOLDOMAB
Debt / assets 16.5% 54.3% 43.4%
Debt / equity 0.2x 1.7x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – 67.3x –
Debt / FCF -1.4x -22.6x –
Liabilities / assets 22.4% 68.6% 63.1%
Equity / assets 77.6% 31.4% 36.9%
Interest coverage – -2.1x –
Current ratio – – 1.3x
Quick ratio – – 1.2x
Cash ratio – – 0.7x
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTRNOCOLDOMAB
Dividend yield 3.3% 6.4% 5.5%
Net buyback yield -4.4% -0.1% –
Shareholder yield -1.1% 6.3% 5.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) 55.0% -57.4% –
Payout ratio (FCF) -31.1% -140.7% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 11.4% 3.4% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 21.2% 3.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTRNOCOLDOMAB
Forward P/E 31.6xFY2026 – 15.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.06FY2026 $-1.34FY2026 $6.60FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -47.4%FY2026 – +3.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -8.7% – +28.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $544.31MFY2026 $2.40BFY2026 $933.64MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +14.3%FY2026 -7.9%FY2026 +1.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.0% +12.7% +19.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTRNOCOLDOMAB
Held by institutions 100.0% 100.0% 12.3%
Institutions holding 384 406 163
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.0% -0.3% +5.4%
Institutions buying 202 212 77
Institutions selling 126 140 59
Buyers to sellers 1.60 1.51 1.31

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TRNOCOLDOMAB
TRNO 1.00 0.30 0.16
COLD 0.30 1.00 0.18
OMAB 0.16 0.18 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TRNO, COLD and OMAB?

Terreno Realty (TRNO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Terreno Realty (TRNO) $6.80B, Americold Realty Trust (COLD) $4.06B, Central North Airport (OMAB) $4.73B.

Which stock is cheaper, TRNO, COLD and OMAB?

Central North Airport (OMAB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Terreno Realty (TRNO) 17.6x, Americold Realty Trust (COLD) -8.9x, Central North Airport (OMAB) 16.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Central North Airport (OMAB) is cheapest (Terreno Realty (TRNO) 31.6x, Central North Airport (OMAB) 15.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Terreno Realty (TRNO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Terreno Realty (TRNO) +18.0%, Americold Realty Trust (COLD) -0.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Terreno Realty (TRNO) has the highest net margin (Terreno Realty (TRNO) 76.9%, Americold Realty Trust (COLD) -17.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Terreno Realty (TRNO) returned the most: Terreno Realty (TRNO) +6.5%, Americold Realty Trust (COLD) +2.1%, Central North Airport (OMAB) -3.4%. Over five years, Central North Airport (OMAB) compounded fastest (Terreno Realty (TRNO) -2.5%/yr, Americold Realty Trust (COLD) -13.6%/yr, Central North Airport (OMAB) +15.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Americold Realty Trust (COLD) has the highest dividend yield: Terreno Realty (TRNO) 0.03%, Americold Realty Trust (COLD) 0.07%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 0.00%. Central North Airport (OMAB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Terreno Realty (TRNO) has been the steadiest (Terreno Realty (TRNO) 19.7%, Americold Realty Trust (COLD) 44.0%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 31.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TRNO, COLD and OMAB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Terreno Realty (TRNO) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.