TRI vs LAW vs AEYE Stock Comparison

Thomson Reuters, CS Disco and Audioeye Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
TRI Thomson Reuters Corp /Can/
$116.41 +17.6% 1M -28.3% 1Y
Market cap
$51.80B
P/E
32.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.83B
Div. yield
3.45%
Compliance Software Technology
5 wins
LAW CS Disco, Inc.
$5.05 +16.6% 1M -26.7% 1Y
Market cap
$327.53M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$167.12M
Div. yield
–
Compliance Software Technology
2 wins
AEYE Audioeye Inc
$10.14 +47.8% 1M -28.9% 1Y
Market cap
$128.53M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$42.73M
Div. yield
–
Compliance Software Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Thomson Reuters leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Thomson Reuters 5, Audioeye 2, CS Disco 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTRILAWAEYELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $51.80B $327.53M $128.53M TRI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 32.2x -8.1x -42.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 26.0x — 10.7x AEYE
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.0% +12.9% +8.1% LAW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 20.7% -24.2% -7.1% TRI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.2x — 3.6x TRI
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 3.45% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -28.3% -26.7% -28.9% LAW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -1.2%/yr -37.7%/yr -0.3%/yr AEYE
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 51.8% 77.3% 78.8% TRI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 45/100 47/100 TRI

Percentile Scorecard

TRILAWAEYE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTRILAWAEYE
Valuation 51 #50 of 101 26 #75 of 101 45 #56 of 101
Growth 29 #69 of 97 52 #47 of 97 77 #23 of 97
Profitability 99 #2 of 94 31 #65 of 94 48 #49 of 94
Financial Health 65 #38 of 108 91 #11 of 108 30 #76 of 108
Shareholder Returns 38 #40 of 64 25 #48 of 64 33 #43 of 64
Overall 57 45 47
  • TRI ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • LAW ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • AEYE ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTRILAWAEYESPY
1 month +17.6%+16.6%+47.8% -0.2%
3 months +12.7%+19.7%+67.1% +3.9%
6 months +29.5%+13.5%+41.8% +8.2%
Year to date -11.7%-34.9%+1.5% +12.9%
1 year -28.3%-26.7%-28.9% +12.3%
3 years -1.2%-12.2%+156.7% +87.4%
3 years, per year -0.4%-4.2%+37.0% +23.3%
5 years -5.7%-90.6%-1.5% +67.9%
5 years, per year -1.2%-37.7%-0.3% +10.9%
10 years +183.3%—+189.7% +261.1%
10 years, per year +11.0%—+11.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureTRILAWAEYESPY
Volatility, 1Y 51.8%77.3%78.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 52.4%85.0%69.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.160.351.96 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.55-0.35-0.37 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -64.3%-95.2%-83.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -28.3%-43.3%-34.0% -1.2%
52-week high $162.38$8.91$15.37 $779.14
52-week low $76.55$2.76$5.40 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTRILAWAEYE
P/E now vs peer median 32.2xmedian 28.3x -8.1xmedian 28.3x -42.0xmedian 28.3x
P/S now vs peer median 6.6xmedian 2.8x 2.0xmedian 2.8x 3.0xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 25.8xmedian 17.3x -5.7xmedian 17.3x 70.7xmedian 17.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 16.2xmedian 15.8x -20.0xmedian 15.8x 19.8xmedian 15.8x
P/B now vs peer median 4.7xmedian 3.2x 2.7xmedian 3.2x 25.3xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median 3.11median 0.85 -0.40median 0.85 -1.53median 0.85

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTRILAWAEYE
Revenue $7.83B $167.12M $42.73M
Gross profit – $125.05M $34.08M
Operating income $2.33B -$43.01M -$2.04M
Net income $1.68B -$40.44M -$3.04M
Free cash flow $3.19B -$16.39M $6.51M
R&D – $58.00M $3.97M
EPS (diluted) $3.61 $-0.63 $-0.23
Cash & equivalents $577.00M $10.89M $9.33M
Total debt $3.26B – $16.23M
Shares (diluted) 449.53M 64.49M 12.97M
Enterprise value $48.58B -$104.99M $96.64M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTRILAWAEYE
P/E 32.2x -8.1x -42.0x
P/FCF 16.2x -20.0x 19.8x
P/Operating cash flow 17.9x -25.2x 19.6x
P/S 6.6x 2.0x 3.0x
P/B 4.7x 2.7x 25.3x
P/Tangible book 6.4x 2.7x -22.4x
EV/EBITDA 25.8x -5.7x 70.7x
EV/EBIT 23.3x -5.3x -66.4x
EV/Revenue 6.9x 1.4x 3.2x
EV/FCF 17.1x -13.8x 20.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 18.8x -17.4x 20.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.11 -0.40 -1.53

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTRILAWAEYE
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.0% 12.9% 8.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.2% 7.5% 11.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 14.1% 9.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 7.6% 12.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 9.1% 30.0% 10.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -0.5% 18.5% 34.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 4.7% 28.5% 13.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -6.8% 18.3% 25.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 8.4% 32.1% 17.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 10.4% 20.3% 27.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 14.5% 16.2% 135.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.1% 34.2% 103.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 13.0% 11.0% 139.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.0% 31.3% 93.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTRILAWAEYE
Gross margin – 74.8% 79.8%
EBITDA margin 26.9% -23.7% 4.5%
Operating margin 29.7% -25.7% -4.8%
Pretax margin 46.5% -23.8% -4.8%
Net margin 20.7% -24.2% -7.1%
FCF margin 40.7% -9.8% 15.2%
Operating cash flow margin 36.9% -7.8% 15.4%
Return on equity – -33.1% -49.2%
Return on assets – -25.0% -5.9%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – -34.6% -9.5%
Asset turnover – 1.0x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x 0.3x -2.2x
Stock comp / revenue – 13.5% 11.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTRILAWAEYE
Debt / assets 18.0% – 47.8%
Debt / equity 0.3x – 3.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.2x – 3.6x
Debt / FCF 1.0x – 2.5x
Liabilities / assets 38.5% 25.5% 85.0%
Equity / assets 61.5% 74.5% 15.0%
Interest coverage 116.5x – –
Current ratio 0.5x 3.8x 1.2x
Quick ratio -2.5x 3.7x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.2x 2.7x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 5.88 2.57 -0.53

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTRILAWAEYE
Dividend yield 3.4% – –
Net buyback yield -2.2% 0.0% 1.1%
Shareholder yield 1.2% 0.0% 1.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) 30.9% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 16.3% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) -10.6% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -8.5% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTRILAWAEYE
Forward P/E 26.0xFY2026 – 10.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.47FY2026 $-0.14FY2026 $0.95FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +12.6%FY2026 – +31.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +8.1% – +31.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.73BFY2026 $183.94MFY2026 $45.31MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.8%FY2026 +17.3%FY2026 +12.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.5% +2.7% +2.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTRILAWAEYE
Held by institutions 90.1% 54.6% 34.0%
Institutions holding 421 119 87
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.6% -0.5% -3.0%
Institutions buying 408 66 52
Institutions selling 9 31 24
Buyers to sellers 45.33 2.13 2.17

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TRILAWAEYE
TRI 1.00 0.42 0.16
LAW 0.42 1.00 0.23
AEYE 0.16 0.23 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TRI, LAW and AEYE?

Thomson Reuters (TRI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Thomson Reuters (TRI) $51.80B, CS Disco (LAW) $327.53M, Audioeye (AEYE) $128.53M.

Which company is growing faster?

CS Disco (LAW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Thomson Reuters (TRI) +7.0%, CS Disco (LAW) +12.9%, Audioeye (AEYE) +8.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Thomson Reuters (TRI) has the highest net margin (Thomson Reuters (TRI) 20.7%, CS Disco (LAW) -24.2%, Audioeye (AEYE) -7.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year CS Disco (LAW) returned the most: Thomson Reuters (TRI) -28.3%, CS Disco (LAW) -26.7%, Audioeye (AEYE) -28.9%. Over five years, Audioeye (AEYE) compounded fastest (Thomson Reuters (TRI) -1.2%/yr, CS Disco (LAW) -37.7%/yr, Audioeye (AEYE) -0.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Thomson Reuters (TRI) 3.45%. CS Disco (LAW) and Audioeye (AEYE) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Thomson Reuters (TRI) has been the steadiest (Thomson Reuters (TRI) 51.8%, CS Disco (LAW) 77.3%, Audioeye (AEYE) 78.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TRI, LAW and AEYE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Thomson Reuters (TRI) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.