TRI vs CLBT vs CLVT Stock Comparison

Thomson Reuters, Cellebrite DI and Clarivate Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
TRI Thomson Reuters Corp /Can/
$122.08 +23.3% 1M -24.9% 1Y
Market cap
$52.26B
P/E
32.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.83B
Div. yield
-0.01%
Compliance Software Technology
5 wins
CLBT Cellebrite DI Ltd.
$12.23 +13.3% 1M -34.5% 1Y
Market cap
$2.88B
P/E
49.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$514.29M
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
5 wins
CLVT Clarivate Plc
$1.88 +6.2% 1M -48.5% 1Y
Market cap
$1.16B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.41B
Div. yield
–
Compliance Software Technology
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Thomson Reuters leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Thomson Reuters 5, Cellebrite DI 5, Clarivate 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTRICLBTCLVTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $52.26B $2.88B $1.16B TRI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 32.2x 49.0x -3.5x TRI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.3x 45.3x 2.6x CLVT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.0% +17.8% -3.5% CLBT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 20.7% 11.4% -13.8% TRI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 7.9% -0.9% CLBT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.2x -3.5x 6.0x CLBT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield -0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -24.9% -34.5% -48.5% TRI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -0.1%/yr +2.4%/yr -39.0%/yr CLBT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 51.7% 64.0% 74.8% TRI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 70/100 58/100 CLBT

Percentile Scorecard

TRICLBTCLVT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTRICLBTCLVT
Valuation 49 #53 of 102 78 #28 of 124 94 #7 of 102
Growth 28 #71 of 98 78 #26 of 113 30 #69 of 98
Profitability 99 #2 of 95 91 #11 of 110 47 #51 of 95
Financial Health 66 #38 of 109 67 #43 of 129 28 #79 of 109
Shareholder Returns 38 #40 of 64 38 #42 of 67 89 #8 of 64
Overall 56 70 58
  • TRI ranked among 115 companies in Business Applications
  • CLBT ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • CLVT ranked among 115 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTRICLBTCLVTSPY
1 month +23.3%+13.3%+6.2% -0.8%
3 months +24.9%-16.5%-11.3% +3.5%
6 months +37.1%-3.4%-23.6% +7.0%
Year to date -7.4%-32.2%-43.7% +12.2%
1 year -24.9%-34.5%-48.5% +13.0%
3 years +3.6%+89.6%-70.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year +1.2%+23.8%-33.4% +23.1%
5 years -0.5%+12.5%-91.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year -0.1%+2.4%-39.0% +11.0%
10 years +196.4%—— +258.0%
10 years, per year +11.5%—— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureTRICLBTCLVTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 51.7%64.0%74.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 52.2%70.7%72.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.180.560.80 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.48-0.54-0.65 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -64.3%-65.1%-94.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -24.8%-36.6%-50.0% -1.8%
52-week high $162.38$19.28$3.76 $779.14
52-week low $76.55$10.44$1.45 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTRICLBTCLVT
P/E now vs peer median 33.8xmedian 28.8x 50.3xmedian 38.1x -3.6xmedian 28.8x
P/S now vs peer median 6.9xmedian 2.8x 5.9xmedian 4.3x 0.5xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 27.0xmedian 17.7x 35.4xmedian 35.4x 7.8xmedian 17.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 17.0xmedian 15.8x 19.2xmedian 27.1x 3.7xmedian 15.8x
P/B now vs peer median 4.9xmedian 3.2x 5.7xmedian 3.4x 0.3xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median 3.26median 0.85 1.09median 1.27 -0.06median 0.85

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTRICLBTCLVT
Revenue $7.83B $514.29M $2.41B
Gross profit – $426.66M $1.61B
Operating income $2.33B $55.86M -$84.60M
Net income $1.68B $58.76M -$334.00M
Free cash flow $3.19B $158.73M $327.60M
R&D – $129.82M –
EPS (diluted) $3.61 $0.24 $-0.52
Cash & equivalents $577.00M $141.25M $217.70M
Total debt $3.26B $71.94M $4.21B
Shares (diluted) 449.53M 249.90M 639.40M
Enterprise value $49.05B $1.62B $52.71M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTRICLBTCLVT
P/E 33.8x 50.3x -3.6x
P/FCF 17.0x 19.2x 3.7x
P/Operating cash flow 18.8x 19.4x 2.1x
P/S 6.9x 5.9x 0.5x
P/B 4.9x 5.7x 0.3x
P/Tangible book 6.7x 7.3x -0.4x
EV/EBITDA 27.0x 35.4x 7.8x
EV/EBIT 24.4x 49.8x -61.4x
EV/Revenue 7.3x 5.4x 2.2x
EV/FCF 17.8x 17.5x 15.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 19.7x 17.6x 9.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.26 1.09 -0.06

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTRICLBTCLVT
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.0% 17.8% -3.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.2% 20.5% -2.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 15.8% -2.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 20.9% -1.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 9.1% -9.7% -55.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -0.5% 61.2% 72.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 4.7% 138.9% 22.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -6.8% 51.0% 56.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 8.4% 132.6% 17.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 10.4% 46.2% 56.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 14.5% -2.2% -9.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.1% 34.9% -7.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 13.0% -0.9% -5.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.0% 31.9% -13.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTRICLBTCLVT
Gross margin – 83.0% 66.8%
EBITDA margin 26.9% 15.2% 27.6%
Operating margin 29.7% 10.9% -3.5%
Pretax margin 46.5% 14.7% -14.0%
Net margin 20.7% 11.4% -13.8%
FCF margin 40.7% 30.9% 13.6%
Operating cash flow margin 36.9% 30.6% 23.8%
Return on equity – 11.2% -7.2%
Return on assets – 6.0% -3.1%
Return on invested capital – 7.9% -0.9%
Return on capital employed – 9.2% -0.9%
Asset turnover – 0.5x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x 2.7x -1.7x
Stock comp / revenue – 11.1% 2.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTRICLBTCLVT
Debt / assets 18.0% 2.5% 40.2%
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.0x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.2x -3.5x 6.0x
Debt / FCF 1.0x 0.2x 12.9x
Liabilities / assets 38.5% 45.9% 56.7%
Equity / assets 61.5% 54.1% 43.3%
Interest coverage 116.5x – –
Current ratio 0.5x 1.6x 0.8x
Quick ratio -2.5x 1.3x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.8x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 6.10 4.89 -0.75

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTRICLBTCLVT
Dividend yield 3.3% – –
Net buyback yield -2.1% -0.4% 11.9%
Shareholder yield 1.1% -0.4% 11.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) 30.9% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 16.3% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) -10.6% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -8.5% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTRICLBTCLVT
Forward P/E 27.3xFY2026 45.3xFY2026 2.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.47FY2026 $0.27FY2026 $0.72FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +12.6%FY2026 -12.9%FY2026 +4.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +8.1% +33.3% +11.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.73BFY2026 $593.75MFY2026 $2.19BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.8%FY2026 +24.8%FY2026 -11.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.5% +14.1% +6.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTRICLBTCLVT
Held by institutions 90.1% 51.4% 91.1%
Institutions holding 421 199 242
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.6% -1.4% +1.7%
Institutions buying 408 117 129
Institutions selling 9 60 81
Buyers to sellers 45.33 1.95 1.59

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TRICLBTCLVT
TRI 1.00 0.38 0.57
CLBT 0.38 1.00 0.24
CLVT 0.57 0.24 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TRI, CLBT and CLVT?

Thomson Reuters (TRI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Thomson Reuters (TRI) $52.26B, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) $2.88B, Clarivate (CLVT) $1.16B.

Which stock is cheaper, TRI, CLBT and CLVT?

Thomson Reuters (TRI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Thomson Reuters (TRI) 32.2x, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 49.0x, Clarivate (CLVT) -3.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Clarivate (CLVT) is cheapest (Thomson Reuters (TRI) 27.3x, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 45.3x, Clarivate (CLVT) 2.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Cellebrite DI (CLBT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Thomson Reuters (TRI) +7.0%, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) +17.8%, Clarivate (CLVT) -3.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Thomson Reuters (TRI) has the highest net margin (Thomson Reuters (TRI) 20.7%, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 11.4%, Clarivate (CLVT) -13.8%). On return on invested capital, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) leads (Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 7.9%, Clarivate (CLVT) -0.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Thomson Reuters (TRI) returned the most: Thomson Reuters (TRI) -24.9%, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) -34.5%, Clarivate (CLVT) -48.5%. Over five years, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) compounded fastest (Thomson Reuters (TRI) -0.1%/yr, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) +2.4%/yr, Clarivate (CLVT) -39.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Thomson Reuters (TRI) has been the steadiest (Thomson Reuters (TRI) 51.7%, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 64.0%, Clarivate (CLVT) 74.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TRI, CLBT and CLVT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Thomson Reuters (TRI) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.