TRC vs KANP vs AWCA Stock Comparison

Tejon Ranch, Kaanapali Land and Awaysis Capital Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
TRC Tejon Ranch Co
$16.26 -1.0% 1M +0.6% 1Y
Market cap
$442.06M
P/E
73.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$56.84M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
3 wins
KANP Kaanapali Land Llc
$29.70 -7.2% 1M -17.5% 1Y
Market cap
$53.24M
P/E
5.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$21.83M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
5 wins
AWCA Awaysis Capital, Inc.
$0.03 -25.0% 1M -87.5% 1Y
Market cap
$12.28M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.34M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Kaanapali Land leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Kaanapali Land 5, Tejon Ranch 3, Awaysis Capital 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTRCKANPAWCALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $442.06M $53.24M $12.28M TRC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 73.2x 5.2x -4.8x KANP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 95.6x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +25.4% +1,110.9% +371.3% KANP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.6% 48.2% -190.5% KANP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.0% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 12.9x — -3.6x AWCA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +0.6% -17.5% -87.5% TRC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.4%/yr +5.0%/yr -13.0%/yr KANP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.4% 35.8% 342.8% TRC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 94/100 27/100 KANP

Percentile Scorecard

TRCKANPAWCA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTRCKANPAWCA
Valuation 29 #28 of 39 100 #1 of 39 5 #37 of 39
Growth 69 #11 of 33 97 #2 of 33 81 #7 of 33
Profitability 52 #15 of 30 86 #5 of 30 7 #28 of 30
Financial Health 78 #9 of 38 – 16 #32 of 38
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 57 94 27
  • TRC ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • KANP ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • AWCA ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTRCKANPAWCASPY
1 month -1.0%-7.2%-25.0% -0.8%
3 months -7.7%-1.0%0.0% +3.5%
6 months -19.3%+16.4%-57.1% +7.0%
Year to date +3.1%+8.0%-75.0% +12.2%
1 year +0.6%-17.5%-87.5% +13.0%
3 years +5.9%+24.3%-93.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year +1.9%+7.5%-59.5% +23.1%
5 years -11.4%+27.7%-50.0% +68.6%
5 years, per year -2.4%+5.0%-13.0% +11.0%
10 years -28.1%+3.8%-50.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year -3.2%+0.4%-6.7% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureTRCKANPAWCASPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.4%35.8%342.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 20.8%74.1%663.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.230.26-0.66 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.03-0.49-0.26 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -32.4%-42.0%-98.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -20.6%-17.5%-87.5% -1.8%
52-week high $20.48$36.00$0.24 $779.14
52-week low $15.58$25.50$0.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTRCKANPAWCA
P/E now vs peer median 72.7xmedian 7.8x 5.2xmedian 7.8x -4.8xmedian 7.8x
P/S now vs peer median 7.7xmedian 4.9x 2.4xmedian 4.9x 9.2xmedian 4.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 83.2xmedian 11.2x 3.2xmedian 11.2x -8.7xmedian 11.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -16.9xmedian 6.4x 3.1xmedian 6.4x -40.3xmedian 6.4x
P/B now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 0.6x 0.6xmedian 0.6x 1.9xmedian 0.6x
PEG now vs peer median -2.90median 0.33 0.17median 0.33 -0.14median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTRCKANPAWCA
Revenue $56.84M $21.83M $1.34M
Gross profit – $9.58M $576.01K
Operating income -$515.00K $4.63M -$2.58M
Net income $6.04M $10.53M -$2.55M
Free cash flow -$26.03M $16.94M -$304.62K
EPS (diluted) $0.22 $5.71 $-0.01
Cash & equivalents $3.87M $37.96M $1.13M
Total debt $377.27M – $30.64M
Shares (diluted) 27.07M 1.85M 409.07M
Enterprise value $361.68M -$56.32M $10.78M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTRCKANPAWCA
P/E 72.7x 5.2x -4.8x
P/FCF -16.9x 3.1x -40.3x
P/Operating cash flow 35.2x 3.0x -42.9x
P/S 7.7x 2.4x 9.2x
P/B 0.9x 0.6x 1.9x
P/Tangible book 0.9x 0.6x 1.9x
EV/EBITDA 83.2x 3.2x -8.7x
EV/EBIT -1,010x 3.3x -8.2x
EV/Revenue 9.1x 0.7x 15.8x
EV/FCF -20.0x 0.9x -69.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 41.7x 0.9x -73.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.90 0.17 -0.14

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTRCKANPAWCA
Revenue growth (1Y) 25.4% 1,111% 371.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 63.4% 49.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 2,581% 18.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 67.8% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 94.8% 181.8% 2.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -27.1% 43.6% 12.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 1,237% 392.9% 7.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -24.8% 30.5% 13.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 1,233% 392.9% 12.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -25.1% 30.5% 33.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -8.4% 524.9% 93.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 21.0% 84.6% 28.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 55.6% 369.6% 94.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -24.6% 78.9% 28.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTRCKANPAWCA
Gross margin – 43.9% 43.0%
EBITDA margin 11.0% 21.9% -181.2%
Operating margin -0.9% 21.2% -192.5%
Pretax margin 5.1% 45.9% -190.5%
Net margin 10.6% 48.2% -190.5%
FCF margin -45.8% 77.6% -22.8%
Operating cash flow margin 21.9% 80.5% -21.4%
Return on equity 1.2% 11.8% -37.9%
Return on assets 0.9% 10.8% -14.4%
Return on invested capital 0.0% – –
Return on capital employed -0.1% – -37.5%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.2x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.1x 1.7x 0.1x
Stock comp / revenue 2.0% – 208.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTRCKANPAWCA
Debt / assets 15.0% – 54.7%
Debt / equity 0.2x – 1.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 12.9x – -3.6x
Debt / FCF -3.7x – -32.7x
Liabilities / assets 22.9% 8.6% 64.6%
Equity / assets 77.1% 91.4% 35.4%
Interest coverage – – -135.0x
Current ratio 2.9x – 1.2x
Quick ratio 1.6x – 0.1x
Cash ratio 1.4x – 0.1x
Altman Z-score 2.17 – -0.95

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTRCKANPAWCA
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTRCKANPAWCA
Forward P/E 95.6xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.17FY2026 – –
EPS growth, next FY +1,600.0%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +147.1% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $57.93MFY2026 – –
Revenue growth, next FY +16.8%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after +23.5% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTRCKANPAWCA
Held by institutions 78.6% – –
Institutions holding 127 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.3% – –
Institutions buying 61 – –
Institutions selling 30 – –
Buyers to sellers 2.03 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TRCKANPAWCA
TRC 1.00 -0.10 0.01
KANP -0.10 1.00 -0.06
AWCA 0.01 -0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TRC, KANP and AWCA?

Tejon Ranch (TRC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Tejon Ranch (TRC) $442.06M, Kaanapali Land (KANP) $53.24M, Awaysis Capital (AWCA) $12.28M.

Which stock is cheaper, TRC, KANP and AWCA?

Kaanapali Land (KANP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Tejon Ranch (TRC) 73.2x, Kaanapali Land (KANP) 5.2x, Awaysis Capital (AWCA) -4.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Kaanapali Land (KANP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Tejon Ranch (TRC) +25.4%, Kaanapali Land (KANP) +1,110.9%, Awaysis Capital (AWCA) +371.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kaanapali Land (KANP) has the highest net margin (Tejon Ranch (TRC) 10.6%, Kaanapali Land (KANP) 48.2%, Awaysis Capital (AWCA) -190.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Tejon Ranch (TRC) returned the most: Tejon Ranch (TRC) +0.6%, Kaanapali Land (KANP) -17.5%, Awaysis Capital (AWCA) -87.5%. Over five years, Kaanapali Land (KANP) compounded fastest (Tejon Ranch (TRC) -2.4%/yr, Kaanapali Land (KANP) +5.0%/yr, Awaysis Capital (AWCA) -13.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Tejon Ranch (TRC) has been the steadiest (Tejon Ranch (TRC) 21.4%, Kaanapali Land (KANP) 35.8%, Awaysis Capital (AWCA) 342.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TRC, KANP and AWCA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kaanapali Land (KANP) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.