TRC vs HHH vs FPH Stock Comparison

Tejon Ranch, Howard Hughes Holdings and Five Point Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
TRC Tejon Ranch Co
$16.26 -1.0% 1M +0.6% 1Y
Market cap
$442.06M
P/E
73.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$56.84M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
3 wins
FPH Five Point Holdings, LLC
$4.16 -12.6% 1M -32.4% 1Y
Market cap
$309.33M
P/E
10.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$118.00M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Howard Hughes Holdings leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Howard Hughes Holdings 4, Five Point Holdings 4, Tejon Ranch 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTRCHHHFPHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $442.06M $4.34B $309.33M HHH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 73.2x 14.8x 10.5x FPH
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 95.6x 15.9x 3.8x FPH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +25.4% +34.0% -39.1% HHH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.6% 12.3% 24.9% FPH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.0% 4.0% -4.0% HHH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 12.9x 4.0x -0.7x FPH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +0.6% -10.2% -32.4% TRC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.4%/yr -2.8%/yr -11.1%/yr TRC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.4% 33.8% 29.2% TRC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 64/100 52/100 HHH

Percentile Scorecard

TRCHHHFPH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTRCHHHFPH
Valuation 29 #28 of 39 84 #7 of 39 63 #15 of 39
Growth 69 #11 of 33 75 #9 of 33 28 #24 of 33
Profitability 52 #15 of 30 72 #9 of 30 41 #18 of 30
Financial Health 78 #9 of 38 24 #29 of 38 76 #10 of 38
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 57 64 52
  • TRC ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • HHH ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • FPH ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTRCHHHFPHSPY
1 month -1.0%+7.1%-12.6% -0.8%
3 months -7.7%+11.2%-22.2% +3.5%
6 months -19.3%+15.0%-16.6% +7.0%
Year to date +3.1%-8.1%-25.6% +12.2%
1 year +0.6%-10.2%-32.4% +13.0%
3 years +5.9%+17.2%+93.5% +86.3%
3 years, per year +1.9%+5.4%+24.6% +23.1%
5 years -11.4%-13.1%-44.4% +68.6%
5 years, per year -2.4%-2.8%-11.1% +11.0%
10 years -28.1%-28.8%— +258.0%
10 years, per year -3.2%-3.3%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureTRCHHHFPHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.4%33.8%29.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 20.8%31.5%30.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.230.790.55 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.03-0.30-1.11 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -32.4%-49.0%-74.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -20.6%-18.4%-34.0% -1.8%
52-week high $20.48$89.85$6.30 $779.14
52-week low $15.58$60.20$4.16 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTRCHHHFPH
P/E now vs peer median 72.7xmedian 7.8x 12.9xmedian 7.8x 10.8xmedian 7.8x
P/S now vs peer median 7.7xmedian 4.9x 1.6xmedian 4.9x 5.2xmedian 4.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 83.2xmedian 11.2x 9.4xmedian 11.2x -5.7xmedian 11.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -16.9xmedian 6.4x 6.1xmedian 6.4x 102.5xmedian 6.4x
P/B now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 0.6x 0.9xmedian 0.6x 0.3xmedian 0.6x
PEG now vs peer median -2.90median 0.33 0.47median 0.33 0.33median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTRCHHHFPH
Revenue $56.84M $2.37B $118.00M
Gross profit – $1.79B -$10.11M
Operating income -$515.00K $505.99M -$131.54M
Net income $6.04M $290.16M $79.23M
Free cash flow -$26.03M $628.36M $6.01M
EPS (diluted) $0.22 $4.94 $0.39
Cash & equivalents $3.87M $2.65B $358.72M
Total debt $377.27M $5.46B $444.40M
Shares (diluted) 27.07M 59.15M 76.10M
Enterprise value $361.68M -$3.10B -$1.16B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTRCHHHFPH
P/E 72.7x 12.9x 10.8x
P/FCF -16.9x 6.1x 102.5x
P/Operating cash flow 35.2x 4.8x 97.0x
P/S 7.7x 1.6x 5.2x
P/B 0.9x 0.9x 0.3x
P/Tangible book 0.9x 1.1x 0.3x
EV/EBITDA 83.2x 9.4x -5.7x
EV/EBIT -1,010x 13.0x -5.3x
EV/Revenue 9.1x 2.8x 5.9x
EV/FCF -20.0x 10.5x 116.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 41.7x 8.4x 110.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.90 0.47 0.33

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTRCHHHFPH
Revenue growth (1Y) 25.4% 34.0% -39.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 20.1% 2.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 67.9% 90.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 31.7% 53.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 94.8% -11.9% 51.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -27.1% 8.1% 15.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 1,237% 27.3% -67.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -24.8% 34.5% 0.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 1,233% 20.1% -6.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -25.1% 27.2% 32.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -8.4% 33.7% -97.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 21.0% – -50.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 55.6% 120.5% -97.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -24.6% – -51.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTRCHHHFPH
Gross margin – 75.6% -8.6%
EBITDA margin 11.0% 29.4% -103.9%
Operating margin -0.9% 21.3% -111.5%
Pretax margin 5.1% 16.0% 79.1%
Net margin 10.6% 12.3% 24.9%
FCF margin -45.8% 26.5% 5.1%
Operating cash flow margin 21.9% 33.2% 5.4%
Return on equity 1.2% 7.4% 3.4%
Return on assets 0.9% 2.1% 2.5%
Return on invested capital 0.0% 4.0% -4.0%
Return on capital employed -0.1% – –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.2x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.1x 2.7x 0.1x
Stock comp / revenue 2.0% 0.7% 7.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTRCHHHFPH
Debt / assets 15.0% 34.3% 13.8%
Debt / equity 0.2x 1.4x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 12.9x 4.0x -0.7x
Debt / FCF -3.7x 8.7x 73.9x
Liabilities / assets 22.9% 74.6% 27.7%
Equity / assets 77.1% 25.4% 72.3%
Interest coverage – 2.9x –
Current ratio 2.9x – –
Quick ratio 1.6x – –
Cash ratio 1.4x – –
Altman Z-score 2.17 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTRCHHHFPH
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 0.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTRCHHHFPH
Forward P/E 95.6xFY2026 15.9xFY2026 3.8xFY2023
EPS, next fiscal year $0.17FY2026 $4.01FY2026 $1.09FY2023
EPS growth, next FY +1,600.0%FY2026 +81.4%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +147.1% -14.2% -136.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $57.93MFY2026 $2.70BFY2026 $559.28MFY2023
Revenue growth, next FY +16.8%FY2026 +83.4%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +23.5% -3.0% -90.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTRCHHHFPH
Held by institutions 78.6% 90.7% 25.2%
Institutions holding 127 303 88
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.3% +1.8% +0.3%
Institutions buying 61 170 37
Institutions selling 30 87 28
Buyers to sellers 2.03 1.95 1.32

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TRCHHHFPH
TRC 1.00 0.24 0.30
HHH 0.24 1.00 0.41
FPH 0.30 0.41 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TRC, HHH and FPH?

Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Tejon Ranch (TRC) $442.06M, Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) $4.34B, Five Point Holdings (FPH) $309.33M.

Which stock is cheaper, TRC, HHH and FPH?

Five Point Holdings (FPH) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Tejon Ranch (TRC) 73.2x, Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) 14.8x, Five Point Holdings (FPH) 10.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Five Point Holdings (FPH) is cheapest (Tejon Ranch (TRC) 95.6x, Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) 15.9x, Five Point Holdings (FPH) 3.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Tejon Ranch (TRC) +25.4%, Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) +34.0%, Five Point Holdings (FPH) -39.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Five Point Holdings (FPH) has the highest net margin (Tejon Ranch (TRC) 10.6%, Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) 12.3%, Five Point Holdings (FPH) 24.9%). On return on invested capital, Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) leads (Tejon Ranch (TRC) 0.0%, Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) 4.0%, Five Point Holdings (FPH) -4.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Tejon Ranch (TRC) returned the most: Tejon Ranch (TRC) +0.6%, Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) -10.2%, Five Point Holdings (FPH) -32.4%. Over five years, Tejon Ranch (TRC) compounded fastest (Tejon Ranch (TRC) -2.4%/yr, Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) -2.8%/yr, Five Point Holdings (FPH) -11.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Tejon Ranch (TRC) has been the steadiest (Tejon Ranch (TRC) 21.4%, Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) 33.8%, Five Point Holdings (FPH) 29.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TRC, HHH and FPH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.