TRC vs FPH vs JOE Stock Comparison

Tejon Ranch, Five Point Holdings and St Joe Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
TRC Tejon Ranch Co
$16.58 +1.0% 1M +3.7% 1Y
Market cap
$447.74M
P/E
74.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$56.84M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
3 wins
FPH Five Point Holdings, LLC
$4.10 -13.9% 1M -31.1% 1Y
Market cap
$606.87M
P/E
10.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$118.00M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
4 wins
JOE ST JOE Co
$68.31 +3.5% 1M +34.7% 1Y
Market cap
$3.86B
P/E
32.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$542.95M
Div. yield
0.94%
Real Estate Development Real Estate
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

St Joe leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (St Joe 4, Five Point Holdings 4, Tejon Ranch 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTRCFPHJOELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $447.74M $606.87M $3.86B JOE
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 74.2x 10.6x 32.0x FPH
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 97.5x 3.8x 88.7x FPH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +25.4% -39.1% +11.1% TRC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.6% 24.9% 22.3% FPH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.0% -4.0% — TRC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 12.9x -0.7x — FPH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.94% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +3.7% -31.1% +34.7% JOE
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -1.9%/yr -11.0%/yr +7.8%/yr JOE
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.4% 29.2% 29.9% TRC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 51/100 68/100 JOE

Percentile Scorecard

TRCFPHJOE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTRCFPHJOE
Valuation 32 #27 of 39 58 #17 of 39 55 #18 of 39
Growth 71 #10 of 32 29 #23 of 32 77 #8 of 32
Profitability 54 #14 of 29 43 #17 of 29 93 #3 of 29
Financial Health 78 #9 of 38 76 #10 of 38 62 #15 of 38
Shareholder Returns – – 54 #7 of 14
Overall 59 51 68
  • TRC ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • FPH ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • JOE ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTRCFPHJOESPY
1 month +1.0%-13.9%+3.5% +0.9%
3 months -2.8%-23.6%+10.2% +5.9%
6 months -15.7%-16.5%-1.0% +8.5%
Year to date +5.1%-26.7%+15.1% +13.3%
1 year +3.7%-31.1%+34.7% +12.4%
3 years +8.0%+90.7%+48.0% +88.1%
3 years, per year +2.6%+24.0%+14.0% +23.5%
5 years -9.0%-44.3%+45.3% +68.2%
5 years, per year -1.9%-11.0%+7.8% +11.0%
10 years -24.0%—+285.9% +263.4%
10 years, per year -2.7%—+14.5% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureTRCFPHJOESPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.4%29.2%29.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 20.9%30.3%26.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.230.540.48 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.17-1.061.16 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -32.4%-74.3%-48.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.0%-34.9%-6.2% -0.9%
52-week high $20.48$6.30$72.79 $779.14
52-week low $15.58$4.08$49.03 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTRCFPHJOE
P/E now vs peer median 74.2xmedian 7.8x 10.6xmedian 7.8x 32.0xmedian 7.8x
P/S now vs peer median 7.9xmedian 4.9x 5.1xmedian 4.9x 7.1xmedian 4.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 84.5xmedian 11.2x -5.6xmedian 11.2x 17.0xmedian 11.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -17.2xmedian 6.2x 101.0xmedian 6.2x 24.6xmedian 6.2x
P/B now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 0.6x 0.3xmedian 0.6x 5.0xmedian 0.6x
PEG now vs peer median -2.96median 0.32 0.32median 0.32 3.08median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTRCFPHJOE
Revenue $56.84M $118.00M $542.95M
Gross profit – -$10.11M $250.51M
Operating income -$515.00K -$131.54M $173.94M
Net income $6.04M $79.23M $120.57M
Free cash flow -$26.03M $6.01M $157.37M
EPS (diluted) $0.22 $0.39 $2.14
Cash & equivalents $3.87M $358.72M $117.86M
Total debt $377.27M $444.40M –
Shares (diluted) 27.07M 76.10M 56.76M
Enterprise value $382.72M $624.58M $3.37B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTRCFPHJOE
P/E 74.2x 10.6x 32.0x
P/FCF -17.2x 101.0x 24.6x
P/Operating cash flow 35.9x 95.6x 20.5x
P/S 7.9x 5.1x 7.1x
P/B 0.9x 0.3x 5.0x
P/Tangible book 0.9x 0.3x 5.0x
EV/EBITDA 84.5x -5.6x 17.0x
EV/EBIT -1,026x -5.3x 21.5x
EV/Revenue 9.3x 5.9x 6.9x
EV/FCF -20.3x 115.2x 23.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 42.4x 109.1x 19.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.96 0.32 3.08

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTRCFPHJOE
Revenue growth (1Y) 25.4% -39.1% 11.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 2.4% 14.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 90.0% 21.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 53.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 94.8% 51.4% 31.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -27.1% 15.7% 27.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 1,237% -67.8% 15.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -24.8% 0.7% 10.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 1,233% -6.4% 18.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -25.1% 32.9% 10.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -8.4% -97.0% 6.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 21.0% -50.3% 19.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 55.6% -97.1% 6.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -24.6% -51.2% 52.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTRCFPHJOE
Gross margin – -8.6% 46.1%
EBITDA margin 11.0% -103.9% 40.6%
Operating margin -0.9% -111.5% 32.0%
Pretax margin 5.1% 79.1% 29.8%
Net margin 10.6% 24.9% 22.3%
FCF margin -45.8% 5.1% 29.0%
Operating cash flow margin 21.9% 5.4% 34.7%
Return on equity 1.2% 3.4% 15.6%
Return on assets 0.9% 2.5% 8.0%
Return on invested capital 0.0% -4.0% –
Return on capital employed -0.1% – –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.0x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.1x 0.1x 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue 2.0% 7.0% 0.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTRCFPHJOE
Debt / assets 15.0% 13.8% –
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA 12.9x -0.7x –
Debt / FCF -3.7x 73.9x –
Liabilities / assets 22.9% 27.7% 48.4%
Equity / assets 77.1% 72.3% 51.6%
Interest coverage – – 6.2x
Current ratio 2.9x – –
Quick ratio 1.6x – –
Cash ratio 1.4x – –
Altman Z-score 2.21 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTRCFPHJOE
Dividend yield – – 0.9%
Net buyback yield – – 2.1%
Shareholder yield 0.0% – 3.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 30.4%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 23.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 12.6%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 14.5%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTRCFPHJOE
Forward P/E 97.5xFY2026 3.8xFY2023 88.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.17FY2026 $1.09FY2023 $0.77FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +1,600.0%FY2026 – -42.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +147.1% -136.7% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $57.93MFY2026 $559.28MFY2023 $273.72MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +16.8%FY2026 – -29.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +23.5% -90.5% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTRCFPHJOE
Held by institutions 78.6% 25.2% 87.6%
Institutions holding 127 88 320
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.3% +0.3% -0.2%
Institutions buying 61 37 160
Institutions selling 30 28 97
Buyers to sellers 2.03 1.32 1.65

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TRCFPHJOE
TRC 1.00 0.29 0.29
FPH 0.29 1.00 0.25
JOE 0.29 0.25 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TRC, FPH and JOE?

St Joe (JOE) is the largest by market capitalisation: Tejon Ranch (TRC) $447.74M, Five Point Holdings (FPH) $606.87M, St Joe (JOE) $3.86B.

Which stock is cheaper, TRC, FPH and JOE?

Five Point Holdings (FPH) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Tejon Ranch (TRC) 74.2x, Five Point Holdings (FPH) 10.6x, St Joe (JOE) 32.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Five Point Holdings (FPH) is cheapest (Tejon Ranch (TRC) 97.5x, Five Point Holdings (FPH) 3.8x, St Joe (JOE) 88.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Tejon Ranch (TRC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Tejon Ranch (TRC) +25.4%, Five Point Holdings (FPH) -39.1%, St Joe (JOE) +11.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Five Point Holdings (FPH) has the highest net margin (Tejon Ranch (TRC) 10.6%, Five Point Holdings (FPH) 24.9%, St Joe (JOE) 22.3%). On return on invested capital, Tejon Ranch (TRC) leads (Tejon Ranch (TRC) 0.0%, Five Point Holdings (FPH) -4.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year St Joe (JOE) returned the most: Tejon Ranch (TRC) +3.7%, Five Point Holdings (FPH) -31.1%, St Joe (JOE) +34.7%. Over five years, St Joe (JOE) compounded fastest (Tejon Ranch (TRC) -1.9%/yr, Five Point Holdings (FPH) -11.0%/yr, St Joe (JOE) +7.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Tejon Ranch (TRC) 0.00%, St Joe (JOE) 0.94%. Tejon Ranch (TRC) and Five Point Holdings (FPH) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Tejon Ranch (TRC) has been the steadiest (Tejon Ranch (TRC) 21.4%, Five Point Holdings (FPH) 29.2%, St Joe (JOE) 29.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TRC, FPH and JOE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, St Joe (JOE) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.