TPR vs RL vs VNCE Stock Comparison

Tapestry, Ralph Lauren and Vince Holding Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
TPR Tapestry, Inc.
$110.89 -2.6% 1M -3.3% 1Y
Market cap
$22.71B
P/E
14.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.00B
Div. yield
–
Luxury Goods Consumer Discretionary
4 wins
RL Ralph Lauren Corp
$386.98 +8.4% 1M +15.3% 1Y
Market cap
$23.50B
P/E
23.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.36B
Div. yield
0.01%
Luxury Goods Consumer Discretionary
5 wins
VNCE Vince Holding Corp.
$11.41 -0.8% 1M +285.5% 1Y
Market cap
$144.06M
P/E
18.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$314.66M
Div. yield
–
Luxury Goods Consumer Discretionary
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Ralph Lauren leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Ralph Lauren 5, Tapestry 4, Vince Holding 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTPRRLVNCELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $22.71B $23.50B $144.06M RL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 14.9x 23.9x 18.9x TPR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.8x 21.0x 8.6x VNCE
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +14.2% +14.7% +8.0% RL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 19.1% 11.8% 2.4% TPR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 51.3% 24.6% 9.4% TPR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.6x -0.5x 0.7x RL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -3.3% +15.3% +285.5% VNCE
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +23.9%/yr +26.0%/yr +5.6%/yr RL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 41.8% 34.7% 104.9% RL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 70/100 66/100 48/100 TPR

Percentile Scorecard

TPRRLVNCE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTPRRLVNCE
Valuation 49 #24 of 46 24 #35 of 46 78 #11 of 46
Growth 88 #6 of 43 79 #10 of 43 62 #17 of 43
Profitability 100 #1 of 42 90 #5 of 42 56 #19 of 42
Financial Health 37 #34 of 53 77 #13 of 53 39 #33 of 53
Shareholder Returns 76 #9 of 34 58 #15 of 34 6 #32 of 34
Overall 70 66 48
  • TPR ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • RL ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • VNCE ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTPRRLVNCESPY
1 month -2.6%+8.4%-0.8% -0.8%
3 months -24.8%+1.8%+88.6% +3.5%
6 months -24.3%+4.5%+147.5% +7.0%
Year to date -13.2%+9.4%+179.7% +12.2%
1 year -3.3%+15.3%+285.5% +13.0%
3 years +301.8%+252.4%+956.5% +86.3%
3 years, per year +59.0%+52.2%+119.5% +23.1%
5 years +191.4%+217.7%+31.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year +23.9%+26.0%+5.6% +11.0%
10 years +210.4%+294.7%-79.4% +258.0%
10 years, per year +12.0%+14.7%-14.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureTPRRLVNCESPY
Volatility, 1Y 41.8%34.7%104.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 47.2%30.9%85.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.031.231.17 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.080.442.72 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -43.0%-37.4%-90.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -32.7%-6.6%-14.6% -1.8%
52-week high $164.78$414.25$13.36 $779.14
52-week low $98.81$309.29$1.99 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTPRRLVNCE
P/E now vs peer median 14.8xmedian 16.6x 23.7xmedian 16.6x 19.3xmedian 16.6x
P/S now vs peer median 2.8xmedian 0.7x 2.8xmedian 0.7x 0.5xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.0xmedian 9.7x 15.2xmedian 9.7x 9.7xmedian 9.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 12.3xmedian 12.2x 22.3xmedian 12.2x 8.1xmedian 12.2x
P/B now vs peer median 32.1xmedian 2.2x 8.5xmedian 2.2x 2.5xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.64median 0.64 0.89median 0.64 -1.09median 0.64

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTPRRLVNCE
Revenue $8.00B $8.36B $314.66M
Gross profit $6.23B $5.87B $165.27M
Operating income $1.91B $1.25B $13.43M
Net income $1.53B $982.90M $7.62M
Free cash flow $1.81B $1.04B $18.11M
EPS (diluted) $7.27 $16.03 $0.58
Cash & equivalents $974.70M $1.72B $1.01M
Total debt $2.38B $1.24B $12.25M
Shares (diluted) 210.20M 61.30M 13.19M
Enterprise value $18.67B $15.60B $140.73M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTPRRLVNCE
P/E 14.8x 23.7x 19.3x
P/FCF 12.3x 22.3x 8.1x
P/Operating cash flow 11.2x 17.7x 7.4x
P/S 2.8x 2.8x 0.5x
P/B 32.1x 8.5x 2.5x
P/Tangible book -910.8x 8.8x 2.5x
EV/EBITDA 11.0x 15.2x 9.7x
EV/EBIT 12.2x 18.1x 11.8x
EV/Revenue 2.9x 2.7x 0.5x
EV/FCF 12.9x 21.6x 8.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.9x 17.1x 8.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.64 0.89 -1.09

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTPRRLVNCE
Revenue growth (1Y) 14.2% 14.7% 8.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.3% 9.0% -0.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 17.8% 16.7% 13.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 9.7% 11.8% 8.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 361.3% 25.2% 178.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 17.8% 21.5% -4.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 733.9% 23.7% 145.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 17.7% 22.8% -16.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 782.7% 26.1% 144.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 23.3% 26.7% -17.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 62.6% 16.2% -7.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 26.6% 27.4% 44.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 65.7% 36.6% 19.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 31.8% 35.6% 42.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTPRRLVNCE
Gross margin 77.8% 70.3% 52.5%
EBITDA margin 26.6% 17.8% 5.2%
Operating margin 23.9% 14.9% 4.3%
Pretax margin 23.2% 14.9% 3.5%
Net margin 19.1% 11.8% 2.4%
FCF margin 22.6% 12.5% 5.8%
Operating cash flow margin 24.7% 15.8% 6.3%
Return on equity 222.3% 35.3% 10.7%
Return on assets 23.2% 12.8% 2.5%
Return on invested capital 51.3% 24.6% 9.4%
Return on capital employed 38.8% 21.4% 8.8%
Asset turnover 1.2x 1.1x 1.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 1.3x 2.6x
Stock comp / revenue 1.3% 1.4% 0.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTPRRLVNCE
Debt / assets 35.6% 16.2% 5.4%
Debt / equity 3.4x 0.5x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.6x -0.5x 0.7x
Debt / FCF 1.3x 1.2x 0.7x
Liabilities / assets 89.7% 64.5% 74.3%
Equity / assets 10.3% 35.5% 25.7%
Interest coverage – 22.4x 4.4x
Current ratio 1.8x 2.0x 1.5x
Quick ratio 0.8x 1.3x 0.4x
Cash ratio 0.7x 1.0x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 3.91 6.32 -4.47

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTPRRLVNCE
Dividend yield 1.5% 1.0% –
Net buyback yield 6.5% 2.7% -1.4%
Shareholder yield 8.0% 3.7% -1.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 22.4% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 21.1% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 8.0% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 3.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTPRRLVNCE
Forward P/E 14.8xFY2027 21.0xFY2026 8.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $7.49FY2027 $18.41FY2026 $1.33FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +6.2%FY2027 +11.0%FY2026 +202.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +27.1% +19.8% -6.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.86BFY2027 $8.10BFY2026 $373.95MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +10.8%FY2027 -0.2%FY2026 +24.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -4.1% +7.2% +2.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTPRRLVNCE
Held by institutions 97.4% 65.2% 14.2%
Institutions holding 1,101 808 35
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.4% +0.6% +98.6%
Institutions buying 601 388 20
Institutions selling 373 324 6
Buyers to sellers 1.61 1.20 3.33

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TPRRLVNCE
TPR 1.00 0.53 0.01
RL 0.53 1.00 0.09
VNCE 0.01 0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TPR, RL and VNCE?

Ralph Lauren (RL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Tapestry (TPR) $22.71B, Ralph Lauren (RL) $23.50B, Vince Holding (VNCE) $144.06M.

Which stock is cheaper, TPR, RL and VNCE?

Tapestry (TPR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Tapestry (TPR) 14.9x, Ralph Lauren (RL) 23.9x, Vince Holding (VNCE) 18.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Vince Holding (VNCE) is cheapest (Tapestry (TPR) 14.8x, Ralph Lauren (RL) 21.0x, Vince Holding (VNCE) 8.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ralph Lauren (RL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Tapestry (TPR) +14.2%, Ralph Lauren (RL) +14.7%, Vince Holding (VNCE) +8.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Tapestry (TPR) has the highest net margin (Tapestry (TPR) 19.1%, Ralph Lauren (RL) 11.8%, Vince Holding (VNCE) 2.4%). On return on invested capital, Tapestry (TPR) leads (Tapestry (TPR) 51.3%, Ralph Lauren (RL) 24.6%, Vince Holding (VNCE) 9.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Vince Holding (VNCE) returned the most: Tapestry (TPR) -3.3%, Ralph Lauren (RL) +15.3%, Vince Holding (VNCE) +285.5%. Over five years, Ralph Lauren (RL) compounded fastest (Tapestry (TPR) +23.9%/yr, Ralph Lauren (RL) +26.0%/yr, Vince Holding (VNCE) +5.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Tapestry (TPR) 0.00%, Ralph Lauren (RL) 0.01%, Vince Holding (VNCE) 0.00%. Tapestry (TPR) and Vince Holding (VNCE) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ralph Lauren (RL) has been the steadiest (Tapestry (TPR) 41.8%, Ralph Lauren (RL) 34.7%, Vince Holding (VNCE) 104.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TPR, RL and VNCE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ralph Lauren (RL) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.