TPL vs OVV vs FRPH Stock Comparison

Texas Pacific Land, Ovintiv and Frp Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
TPL Texas Pacific Land Corp
$333.15 -2.3% 1M +7.6% 1Y
Market cap
$22.93B
P/E
42.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$897.54M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Operators Real Estate
5 wins
OVV Ovintiv Inc.
$72.54 +20.6% 1M +92.5% 1Y
Market cap
$19.98B
P/E
21.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.80B
Div. yield
0.02%
Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Energy
5 wins
FRPH Frp Holdings, Inc.
$18.96 -10.2% 1M -24.1% 1Y
Market cap
$358.81M
P/E
263.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$43.62M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Operators Real Estate
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Texas Pacific Land leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Texas Pacific Land 5, Ovintiv 5, Frp Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTPLOVVFRPHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $22.93B $19.98B $358.81M TPL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 42.3x 21.7x 263.6x OVV
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 34.0x 9.2x — OVV
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +20.8% +6.5% +3.1% TPL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 60.3% 9.4% 3.1% TPL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 33.0% 5.7% 0.9% TPL
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.0x 6.4x OVV
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +7.6% +92.5% -24.1% OVV
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +19.3%/yr +13.9%/yr -7.6%/yr TPL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 49.0% 35.3% 25.8% FRPH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 61/100 30/100 OVV

Percentile Scorecard

TPLOVVFRPH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTPLOVVFRPH
Valuation 21 #31 of 39 65 #35 of 99 24 #30 of 39
Growth 38 #21 of 33 46 #53 of 97 13 #29 of 33
Profitability 100 #1 of 30 63 #36 of 96 48 #16 of 30
Financial Health 97 #2 of 38 60 #41 of 102 35 #25 of 38
Shareholder Returns 39 #9 of 14 68 #25 of 76 –
Overall 59 61 30
  • TPL ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • OVV ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream
  • FRPH ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTPLOVVFRPHSPY
1 month -2.3%+20.6%-10.2% -0.8%
3 months -16.0%+20.7%-19.5% +3.5%
6 months -23.7%+27.4%-11.6% +7.0%
Year to date +16.0%+85.1%-16.8% +12.2%
1 year +7.6%+92.5%-24.1% +13.0%
3 years +64.8%+51.8%-29.8% +86.3%
3 years, per year +18.1%+14.9%-11.1% +23.1%
5 years +141.2%+91.8%-32.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year +19.3%+13.9%-7.6% +11.0%
10 years +941.1%+40.9%+18.9% +258.0%
10 years, per year +26.4%+3.5%+1.7% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureTPLOVVFRPHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 49.0%35.3%25.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 50.5%35.9%26.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.40-0.590.26 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.162.62-0.93 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -52.8%-49.7%-42.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -38.3%0.0%-25.8% -1.8%
52-week high $539.79$72.54$25.56 $779.14
52-week low $273.56$36.61$18.77 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTPLOVVFRPH
P/E now vs peer median 42.4xmedian 7.8x 22.1xmedian 13.5x 265.2xmedian 7.8x
P/S now vs peer median 25.6xmedian 4.9x 2.0xmedian 2.1x 8.3xmedian 4.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 30.7xmedian 11.2x 7.4xmedian 5.9x 26.9xmedian 11.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -350.2xmedian 6.4x 8.9xmedian 11.0x —median 6.4x
P/B now vs peer median 13.7xmedian 0.6x 1.7xmedian 1.5x 0.8xmedian 0.6x
PEG now vs peer median 4.60median 0.33 -0.59median 2.27 -8.16median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTPLOVVFRPH
Revenue $897.54M $9.80B $43.62M
Gross profit – $8.96B –
Operating income $672.48M $949.00M $6.16M
Net income $541.42M $920.00M $1.32M
Free cash flow -$65.61M $2.27B –
EPS (diluted) $7.84 $3.26 $0.07
Cash & equivalents $248.61M $700.00M $100.98M
Total debt – $3.70B $214.62M
Shares (diluted) 69.03M 281.90M 19.06M
Enterprise value $21.76B $18.95B -$136.81M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTPLOVVFRPH
P/E 42.4x 22.1x 265.2x
P/FCF -350.2x 8.9x –
P/Operating cash flow 38.1x 4.5x –
P/S 25.6x 2.0x 8.3x
P/B 13.7x 1.7x 0.8x
P/Tangible book 14.0x 1.7x 0.8x
EV/EBITDA 30.7x 7.4x 26.9x
EV/EBIT 33.8x 24.3x 77.5x
EV/Revenue 25.3x 2.4x 10.9x
EV/FCF -346.4x 10.2x –
EV/Operating cash flow 37.7x 5.2x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 4.60 -0.59 -8.16

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTPLOVVFRPH
Revenue growth (1Y) 20.8% 6.5% 3.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 11.3% -6.4% 3.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 7.5% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -7.0% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 19.3% -0.2% -38.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 9.5% -36.7% -15.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 17.3% 54.6% -75.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 9.1% -35.0% -33.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 17.3% 42.7% -74.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 9.2% -37.4% -32.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 15.4% 13.4% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.2% 6.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -176.9% 33.3% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -29.3% 11.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTPLOVVFRPH
Gross margin – 91.3% –
EBITDA margin 82.5% 31.7% 40.7%
Operating margin 74.9% 9.7% 14.1%
Pretax margin 76.2% 2.8% 24.5%
Net margin 60.3% 9.4% 3.1%
FCF margin -7.3% 23.1% –
Operating cash flow margin 67.2% 45.4% –
Return on equity 33.5% 8.0% 0.2%
Return on assets 30.0% 4.4% 0.1%
Return on invested capital 33.0% 5.7% 0.9%
Return on capital employed 39.3% 5.1% –
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.5x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 4.8x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.9% – 6.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTPLOVVFRPH
Debt / assets – 19.2% 28.2%
Debt / equity – 0.3x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.0x 6.4x
Debt / FCF – 1.6x –
Liabilities / assets 10.1% 40.4% 40.3%
Equity / assets 89.9% 59.6% 59.7%
Interest coverage 342.2x 2.4x 2.1x
Current ratio 4.6x 1.0x –
Quick ratio 4.5x 0.9x –
Cash ratio 2.6x 0.3x –
Altman Z-score 76.94 2.37 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTPLOVVFRPH
Dividend yield 0.7% 1.7% –
Net buyback yield 0.0% 2.9% –
Shareholder yield 0.7% 4.6% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – 35.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 14.2% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 3.5% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 6.6% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTPLOVVFRPH
Forward P/E 34.0xFY2026 9.2xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $9.79FY2026 $7.90FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +40.5%FY2026 +57.7%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after -1.3% +1.4% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $976.77MFY2026 $10.54BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +22.4%FY2026 +18.3%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +25.8% -11.8% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTPLOVVFRPH
Held by institutions 72.9% 91.6% 47.8%
Institutions holding 868 593 109
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.5% +4.2% +3.0%
Institutions buying 440 328 56
Institutions selling 276 177 30
Buyers to sellers 1.59 1.85 1.87

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TPLOVVFRPH
TPL 1.00 0.36 0.04
OVV 0.36 1.00 -0.13
FRPH 0.04 -0.13 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TPL, OVV and FRPH?

Texas Pacific Land (TPL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Texas Pacific Land (TPL) $22.93B, Ovintiv (OVV) $19.98B, Frp Holdings (FRPH) $358.81M.

Which stock is cheaper, TPL, OVV and FRPH?

Ovintiv (OVV) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Texas Pacific Land (TPL) 42.3x, Ovintiv (OVV) 21.7x, Frp Holdings (FRPH) 263.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ovintiv (OVV) is cheapest (Texas Pacific Land (TPL) 34.0x, Ovintiv (OVV) 9.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Texas Pacific Land (TPL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Texas Pacific Land (TPL) +20.8%, Ovintiv (OVV) +6.5%, Frp Holdings (FRPH) +3.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Texas Pacific Land (TPL) has the highest net margin (Texas Pacific Land (TPL) 60.3%, Ovintiv (OVV) 9.4%, Frp Holdings (FRPH) 3.1%). On return on invested capital, Texas Pacific Land (TPL) leads (Texas Pacific Land (TPL) 33.0%, Ovintiv (OVV) 5.7%, Frp Holdings (FRPH) 0.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ovintiv (OVV) returned the most: Texas Pacific Land (TPL) +7.6%, Ovintiv (OVV) +92.5%, Frp Holdings (FRPH) -24.1%. Over five years, Texas Pacific Land (TPL) compounded fastest (Texas Pacific Land (TPL) +19.3%/yr, Ovintiv (OVV) +13.9%/yr, Frp Holdings (FRPH) -7.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Texas Pacific Land (TPL) 0.00%, Ovintiv (OVV) 0.02%, Frp Holdings (FRPH) 0.00%. Texas Pacific Land (TPL) and Frp Holdings (FRPH) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Frp Holdings (FRPH) has been the steadiest (Texas Pacific Land (TPL) 49.0%, Ovintiv (OVV) 35.3%, Frp Holdings (FRPH) 25.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TPL, OVV and FRPH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Texas Pacific Land (TPL) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.