TPB vs CHUC vs GNLN Stock Comparison

Turning Point Brands, Charlie's Holdings and Greenlane Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Turning Point Brands leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Turning Point Brands 7, Charlie's Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTPBCHUCGNLNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.34B $41.11M $7.58M TPB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 30.1x -21.0x -0.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 55.8x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +24.5% +310.5% -67.0% CHUC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.8% -7.9% -4,632.1% TPB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 9.1% -47.3% — TPB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.6x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -28.4% -37.5% -92.7% TPB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +11.6%/yr -5.6%/yr -96.2%/yr TPB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 56.5% 130.1% 139.0% TPB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 32/100 22/100 TPB

Percentile Scorecard

TPBCHUCGNLN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTPBCHUCGNLN
Valuation 32 #26 of 38 3 #37 of 38 9 #90 of 99
Growth 50 #18 of 35 47 #19 of 35 20 #75 of 94
Profitability 89 #5 of 36 37 #23 of 36 3 #87 of 90
Financial Health 79 #9 of 39 32 #27 of 39 56 #47 of 105
Shareholder Returns 17 #11 of 13 42 #8 of 13 –
Overall 53 32 22
  • TPB ranked among 40 companies in Tobacco and Cannabis
  • CHUC ranked among 40 companies in Tobacco and Cannabis
  • GNLN ranked among 109 companies in Fintech

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTPBCHUCGNLNSPY
1 month +5.3%0.0%-38.4% -0.8%
3 months -17.0%-11.8%-3.1% +3.5%
6 months -18.2%-42.3%-56.8% +7.0%
Year to date -39.8%-50.0%-85.0% +12.2%
1 year -28.4%-37.5%-92.7% +13.0%
3 years +229.2%+66.7%-100.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year +48.8%+18.6%-96.3% +23.1%
5 years +72.8%-25.0%-100.0% +68.6%
5 years, per year +11.6%-5.6%-96.2% +11.0%
10 years +423.7%-98.8%— +258.0%
10 years, per year +18.0%-35.5%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureTPBCHUCGNLNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 56.5%130.1%139.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 66.2%156.9%142.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.610.592.43 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.50-0.29-0.67 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -61.4%-83.3%-100.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -54.3%-53.1%-93.0% -1.8%
52-week high $142.98$0.32$27.08 $779.14
52-week low $55.23$0.09$1.68 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTPBCHUCGNLN
P/E now vs peer median 29.2xmedian 16.5x -21.0xmedian 16.5x -0.1xmedian 20.6x
P/S now vs peer median 2.6xmedian 0.9x 1.7xmedian 0.9x 2.9xmedian 2.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.3x -16.5xmedian 12.3x 0.0xmedian 15.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 66.7xmedian 23.1x -9.5xmedian 23.1x -0.5xmedian 16.4x
P/B now vs peer median 2.9xmedian 1.0x 13.4xmedian 1.0x 0.3xmedian 1.9x
PEG now vs peer median 0.56median 0.56 -1.27median 0.56 0.00median 1.05

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTPBCHUCGNLN
Revenue $507.23M $24.67M $2.63M
Gross profit $300.08M $6.76M -$12.94M
Operating income $75.01M -$2.67M -$56.54M
Net income $59.64M -$2.14M -$121.56M
Free cash flow $19.63M -$4.42M -$15.54M
EPS (diluted) $2.21 $-0.01 $-29.71
Cash & equivalents $270.20M $527.00K $6.10M
Total debt $1.18B $9.45M –
Shares (diluted) 20.16M 274.07M 4.10M
Enterprise value $449.49M $37.47M -$46.16M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTPBCHUCGNLN
P/E 29.2x -21.0x -0.1x
P/FCF 66.7x -9.5x -0.5x
P/Operating cash flow 40.6x -9.5x -0.5x
P/S 2.6x 1.7x 2.9x
P/B 2.9x 13.4x 0.3x
P/Tangible book 3.4x 13.4x 0.9x
EV/EBITDA – -16.5x 0.0x
EV/EBIT 17.8x -16.4x 0.0x
EV/Revenue 2.6x 1.8x 0.6x
EV/FCF 67.9x -9.9x -0.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 41.4x -9.9x -0.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.56 -1.27 0.00

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTPBCHUCGNLN
Revenue growth (1Y) 24.5% 310.5% -67.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 11.1% 9.2% -69.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 31.0% 233.5% -388.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 16.3% – -37.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) -15.0% 22.8% -410.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 0.3% 5.7% 30.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 23.8% 22.0% -518.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 69.6% 10.9% 10.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -7.6% 26.5% 80.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 52.4% 16.6% 85.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -46.5% 12.8% -51.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -14.0% -139.9% -24.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -62.4% 12.8% -49.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -24.4% -121.4% -16.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTPBCHUCGNLN
Gross margin 59.2% 27.4% -492.4%
EBITDA margin – -10.7% -2,135%
Operating margin 14.8% -10.8% -2,151%
Pretax margin 13.6% -9.3% -4,625%
Net margin 8.8% -7.9% -4,632%
FCF margin 3.9% -17.9% -591.1%
Operating cash flow margin 6.4% -17.9% -590.0%
Return on equity 14.2% -68.5% -321.8%
Return on assets 7.3% -15.5% -275.5%
Return on invested capital 9.1% -47.3% –
Return on capital employed 10.3% -40.6% -150.5%
Asset turnover 0.6x 1.8x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.5x 2.1x 0.1x
Stock comp / revenue 1.8% 0.6% 41.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTPBCHUCGNLN
Debt / assets 34.4% 16.8% –
Debt / equity 0.6x 0.7x –
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.6x –
Debt / FCF 15.0x -0.5x –
Liabilities / assets 46.9% 75.5% 20.4%
Equity / assets 53.1% 24.5% 79.6%
Interest coverage 2.7x -9.9x -1,067x
Current ratio 5.7x 1.7x 2.4x
Quick ratio 3.5x 0.1x 0.9x
Cash ratio 3.1x 0.1x 0.9x
Altman Z-score 3.77 3.10 -22.35

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTPBCHUCGNLN
Dividend yield 0.5% – –
Net buyback yield -12.2% -1.9% –
Shareholder yield -11.7% -1.9% –
Payout ratio (earnings) 10.2% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 30.9% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 15.9% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 11.9% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTPBCHUCGNLN
Forward P/E 55.8xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.17FY2026 – $-904,073.61FY2023
EPS growth, next FY -62.4%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +59.0% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $597.82MFY2026 – $266.10MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +29.1%FY2026 – +6,010.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.7% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTPBCHUCGNLN
Held by institutions 99.9% – –
Institutions holding 231 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ +8.1% – –
Institutions buying 138 – –
Institutions selling 66 – –
Buyers to sellers 2.09 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TPBCHUCGNLN
TPB 1.00 -0.01 0.17
CHUC -0.01 1.00 -0.02
GNLN 0.17 -0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TPB, CHUC and GNLN?

Turning Point Brands (TPB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Turning Point Brands (TPB) $1.34B, Charlie's Holdings (CHUC) $41.11M, Greenlane Holdings (GNLN) $7.58M.

Which company is growing faster?

Charlie's Holdings (CHUC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Turning Point Brands (TPB) +24.5%, Charlie's Holdings (CHUC) +310.5%, Greenlane Holdings (GNLN) -67.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Turning Point Brands (TPB) has the highest net margin (Turning Point Brands (TPB) 8.8%, Charlie's Holdings (CHUC) -7.9%, Greenlane Holdings (GNLN) -4,632.1%). On return on invested capital, Turning Point Brands (TPB) leads (Turning Point Brands (TPB) 9.1%, Charlie's Holdings (CHUC) -47.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Turning Point Brands (TPB) returned the most: Turning Point Brands (TPB) -28.4%, Charlie's Holdings (CHUC) -37.5%, Greenlane Holdings (GNLN) -92.7%. Over five years, Turning Point Brands (TPB) compounded fastest (Turning Point Brands (TPB) +11.6%/yr, Charlie's Holdings (CHUC) -5.6%/yr, Greenlane Holdings (GNLN) -96.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Turning Point Brands (TPB) 0.00%, Charlie's Holdings (CHUC) 0.00%, Greenlane Holdings (GNLN) 0.00%. Charlie's Holdings (CHUC) and Greenlane Holdings (GNLN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Turning Point Brands (TPB) has been the steadiest (Turning Point Brands (TPB) 56.5%, Charlie's Holdings (CHUC) 130.1%, Greenlane Holdings (GNLN) 139.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TPB, CHUC and GNLN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Turning Point Brands (TPB) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.