TPB vs BLSH vs HGYN Stock Comparison

Turning Point Brands, Bullish and Hong Yuan Holding Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BLSH Bullish
$27.63 -26.5% 1M -49.0% 1Y
Market cap
$4.17B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$190.34B
Div. yield
–
Blockchain Infrastructure Technology
1 win
HGYN Hong Yuan Holding Group
$0.04 0.0% 1M -20.0% 1Y
Market cap
$2.99M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$559.73K
Div. yield
–
Food Distribution Consumer Staples
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Turning Point Brands leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Turning Point Brands 7, Bullish 1, Hong Yuan Holding 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTPBBLSHHGYNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.31B $4.17B $2.99M BLSH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 29.2x -2.5x -29.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 55.8x 65.8x — TPB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +24.5% -26.5% +6.1% TPB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.8% -0.7% -17.9% TPB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 9.1% -4.8% — TPB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.6x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.48% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -28.4% -49.0% -20.0% HGYN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +11.6%/yr — -27.5%/yr TPB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 56.5% 73.1% 349.7% TPB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 76/100 66/100 19/100 TPB

Percentile Scorecard

TPBBLSHHGYN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTPBBLSHHGYN
Valuation 43 #9 of 15 76 #13 of 50 17 #11 of 13
Growth 73 #4 of 12 47 #25 of 46 20 #9 of 11
Profitability 100 #1 of 13 49 #22 of 42 22 #8 of 10
Financial Health 87 #3 of 16 94 #4 of 54 17 #11 of 13
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 76 66 19
  • TPB ranked among 17 companies in Tobacco and Cannabis
  • BLSH ranked among 57 companies in Fintech
  • HGYN ranked among 14 companies in Staples Retail

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTPBBLSHHGYNSPY
1 month +5.3%-26.5%0.0% -0.8%
3 months -17.0%+21.2%+33.3% +3.5%
6 months -18.2%-29.0%-60.0% +7.0%
Year to date -39.8%-27.0%0.0% +12.2%
1 year -28.4%-49.0%-20.0% +13.0%
3 years +229.2%—+100.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year +48.8%—+26.0% +23.1%
5 years +72.8%—-80.0% +68.6%
5 years, per year +11.6%—-27.5% +11.0%
10 years +423.7%—— +258.0%
10 years, per year +18.0%—— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureTPBBLSHHGYNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 56.5%73.1%349.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 66.2%70.7%541.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.612.720.24 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.50-0.67-0.06 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -61.4%-70.8%-95.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -54.3%-50.9%-73.3% -1.8%
52-week high $142.98$56.31$0.15 $779.14
52-week low $55.23$21.79$0.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTPBBLSHHGYN
P/E now vs peer median 29.2xmedian 29.2x -2.5xmedian 9.8x -29.9xmedian 16.1x
P/S now vs peer median 2.6xmedian 0.7x 0.0xmedian 1.8x 5.3xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 25.1x -32.6xmedian 11.7x -33.8xmedian 7.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 66.7xmedian 34.2x 36.6xmedian 11.5x -78.9xmedian 11.5x
P/B now vs peer median 2.9xmedian 1.7x 1.7xmedian 0.9x -13.0xmedian 1.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.56median 0.78 —median 1.21 1.29median 0.54

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTPBBLSHHGYN
Revenue $507.23M $190.34B $559.73K
Gross profit $300.08M $71.94M $370.82K
Operating income $75.01M -$124.59M -$91.58K
Net income $59.64M -$1.43B -$99.38K
Free cash flow $19.63M $113.88M -$37.82K
EPS (diluted) $2.21 $-10.84 $0.00
Cash & equivalents $270.20M $86.61M $13.37K
Total debt $1.18B $11.00K –
Shares (diluted) 20.16M 127.72M 74.64M
Enterprise value $441.00M -$607.84M $3.02M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTPBBLSHHGYN
P/E 29.2x -2.5x -29.9x
P/FCF 66.7x 36.6x -78.9x
P/Operating cash flow 40.6x 33.9x -78.9x
P/S 2.6x 0.0x 5.3x
P/B 2.9x 1.7x -13.0x
P/Tangible book 3.4x 1.7x -12.3x
EV/EBITDA – -32.6x -33.8x
EV/EBIT 17.8x -30.9x -32.5x
EV/Revenue 2.6x 0.0x 5.3x
EV/FCF 67.9x 33.8x -78.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 41.4x 31.3x -78.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.56 – 1.29

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTPBBLSHHGYN
Revenue growth (1Y) 24.5% -26.5% 6.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 11.1% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 31.0% -17.9% 26.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 16.3% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -15.0% -57.2% -268.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 0.3% – -19.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 23.8% -858.6% -2,581%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 69.6% – -22.9%
EPS growth (1Y) -7.6% -755.9% -362.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 52.4% – -23.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -46.5% 190.7% 24.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -14.0% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -62.4% 171.4% 24.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -24.4% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTPBBLSHHGYN
Gross margin 59.2% 0.0% 66.2%
EBITDA margin – -0.1% -15.7%
Operating margin 14.8% -0.1% -16.4%
Pretax margin 13.6% -0.8% -16.4%
Net margin 8.8% -0.7% -17.9%
FCF margin 3.9% 0.1% -6.8%
Operating cash flow margin 6.4% 0.1% -6.8%
Return on equity 14.2% -55.4% –
Return on assets 7.3% -44.5% -16.4%
Return on invested capital 9.1% -4.8% –
Return on capital employed 10.3% -4.0% –
Asset turnover 0.6x 59.3x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.5x -0.1x 0.4x
Stock comp / revenue 1.8% 0.0% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTPBBLSHHGYN
Debt / assets 34.4% 0.0% –
Debt / equity 0.6x 0.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.6x –
Debt / FCF 15.0x 0.0x –
Liabilities / assets 46.9% 20.6% 136.2%
Equity / assets 53.1% 79.4% -36.2%
Interest coverage 2.7x -2.2x –
Current ratio 5.7x 23.5x 0.8x
Quick ratio 3.5x 2.5x 0.5x
Cash ratio 3.1x 2.5x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 3.77 64.94 -214.31

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTPBBLSHHGYN
Dividend yield 0.5% – –
Net buyback yield -12.2% – –
Shareholder yield -11.7% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) 10.2% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 30.9% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 15.9% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 11.9% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTPBBLSHHGYN
Forward P/E 55.8xFY2026 65.8xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.17FY2026 $0.42FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY -62.4%FY2026 +40.0%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +59.0% +95.2% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $597.82MFY2026 $364.64MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +29.1%FY2026 +26.4%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +4.7% +5.7% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTPBBLSHHGYN
Held by institutions 99.9% 32.8% –
Institutions holding 231 175 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +8.1% +7.8% –
Institutions buying 138 87 –
Institutions selling 66 70 –
Buyers to sellers 2.09 1.24 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TPBBLSHHGYN
TPB 1.00 -0.05 -0.03
BLSH -0.05 1.00 -0.13
HGYN -0.03 -0.13 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TPB, BLSH and HGYN?

Bullish (BLSH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Turning Point Brands (TPB) $1.31B, Bullish (BLSH) $4.17B, Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) $2.99M.

Which company is growing faster?

Turning Point Brands (TPB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Turning Point Brands (TPB) +24.5%, Bullish (BLSH) -26.5%, Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) +6.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Turning Point Brands (TPB) has the highest net margin (Turning Point Brands (TPB) 8.8%, Bullish (BLSH) -0.7%, Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) -17.9%). On return on invested capital, Turning Point Brands (TPB) leads (Turning Point Brands (TPB) 9.1%, Bullish (BLSH) -4.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) returned the most: Turning Point Brands (TPB) -28.4%, Bullish (BLSH) -49.0%, Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) -20.0%. Over five years, Turning Point Brands (TPB) compounded fastest (Turning Point Brands (TPB) +11.6%/yr, Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) -27.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Turning Point Brands (TPB) 0.48%. Bullish (BLSH) and Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Turning Point Brands (TPB) has been the steadiest (Turning Point Brands (TPB) 56.5%, Bullish (BLSH) 73.1%, Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) 349.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TPB, BLSH and HGYN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Turning Point Brands (TPB) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.