TMO vs ABT vs DHR Stock Comparison

Thermo Fisher Scientific, Abbott Laboratories and Danaher Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ABT Abbott Laboratories
$103.69 +0.2% 1M -17.9% 1Y
Market cap
$182.26B
P/E
33.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$46.59B
Div. yield
0.02%
Medical Devices Healthcare
6 wins
DHR Danaher Corp /De/
$230.44 +3.9% 1M +3.5% 1Y
Market cap
$164.19B
P/E
41.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$25.11B
Div. yield
–
Life Sciences Tools Healthcare
2 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Abbott Laboratories leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Abbott Laboratories 6, Thermo Fisher Scientific 4, Danaher 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTMOABTDHRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $254.18B $182.26B $164.19B TMO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 36.5x 33.6x 41.0x ABT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 26.1x 18.2x 25.5x ABT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.2% +8.1% +4.6% ABT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 15.0% 11.6% 15.9% DHR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.9% 6.2% 5.7% TMO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.5x 2.5x 2.9x ABT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.00% ABT
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +17.8% -17.9% +3.5% TMO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.9%/yr -3.9%/yr -6.0%/yr TMO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 29.8% 27.4% 30.6% ABT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 57/100 60/100 DHR

Percentile Scorecard

TMOABTDHR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTMOABTDHR
Valuation 60 #93 of 228 68 #74 of 228 67 #75 of 228
Growth 35 #144 of 222 27 #162 of 222 20 #178 of 222
Profitability 83 #37 of 210 85 #33 of 210 88 #27 of 210
Financial Health 28 #174 of 241 38 #151 of 241 46 #131 of 241
Shareholder Returns 88 #18 of 138 66 #48 of 138 77 #32 of 138
Overall 59 57 60
  • TMO ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • ABT ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • DHR ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTMOABTDHRSPY
1 month +1.2%+0.2%+3.9% -1.0%
3 months +18.6%+0.6%+20.3% +2.9%
6 months +43.5%+13.8%+30.0% +6.4%
Year to date +16.3%-17.2%+0.7% +11.4%
1 year +17.8%-17.9%+3.5% +13.1%
3 years +47.1%+9.4%+17.1% +79.4%
3 years, per year +13.7%+3.0%+5.4% +21.5%
5 years +10.1%-18.2%-26.5% +67.7%
5 years, per year +1.9%-3.9%-6.0% +10.9%
10 years +347.3%+156.0%+187.4% +255.2%
10 years, per year +16.2%+9.9%+11.1% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureTMOABTDHRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 29.8%27.4%30.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 28.3%27.5%31.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.590.000.44 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.60-0.660.11 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -41.5%-41.6%-50.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -3.3%-20.6%-4.8% -2.5%
52-week high $696.55$130.59$242.05 $779.14
52-week low $438.34$82.56$161.91 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTMOABTDHR
P/E now vs peer median 35.9xmedian 30.7x 33.3xmedian 30.7x 40.6xmedian 30.7x
P/S now vs peer median 5.4xmedian 3.0x 3.9xmedian 3.0x 6.5xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 25.9xmedian 17.7x 19.1xmedian 17.7x 24.0xmedian 17.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 34.0xmedian 23.7x 22.9xmedian 23.7x 29.6xmedian 23.7x
P/B now vs peer median 4.7xmedian 2.4x 3.5xmedian 2.4x 3.1xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 4.27median 0.96 18.30median 0.96 -3.24median 0.96

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTMOABTDHR
Revenue $46.34B $46.59B $25.11B
Gross profit $18.91B $26.37B $14.69B
Operating income $8.15B $7.35B $5.13B
Net income $6.99B $5.43B $4.00B
Free cash flow $7.32B $7.82B $5.47B
R&D $1.40B $3.16B $1.62B
EPS (diluted) $18.78 $3.11 $5.66
Cash & equivalents $4.06B $5.10B $4.35B
Total debt $42.55B $32.61B $26.56B
Shares (diluted) 371.00M 1.74B 707.60M
Enterprise value $233.20B $152.69B $148.00B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTMOABTDHR
P/E 35.9x 33.3x 40.6x
P/FCF 34.0x 22.9x 29.6x
P/Operating cash flow 27.6x 18.1x 24.4x
P/S 5.4x 3.9x 6.5x
P/B 4.7x 3.5x 3.1x
P/Tangible book 7.3x 5.2x 5.2x
EV/EBITDA 25.9x 19.1x 24.0x
EV/EBIT 35.3x 28.1x 35.9x
EV/Revenue 6.2x 4.4x 7.3x
EV/FCF 39.3x 26.4x 33.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 31.9x 20.8x 27.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 4.27 18.30 -3.24

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTMOABTDHR
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.2% 8.1% 4.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 2.1% 5.0% -0.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 6.2% 9.2% 2.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 3.0% 5.9% -0.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 10.0% -2.2% 16.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 6.7% 6.2% -7.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 6.2% -61.2% 17.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 6.9% 1.7% -14.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 7.8% -61.0% 19.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 8.4% 1.8% -12.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 18.9% 9.6% 7.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.4% 9.9% -7.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 18.6% 15.5% 12.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 7.7% 12.5% -9.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTMOABTDHR
Gross margin 40.8% 56.6% 58.5%
EBITDA margin 23.9% 23.2% 30.5%
Operating margin 17.6% 15.8% 20.4%
Pretax margin 16.5% 16.1% 19.0%
Net margin 15.0% 11.6% 15.9%
FCF margin 15.8% 16.8% 21.8%
Operating cash flow margin 19.5% 21.3% 26.4%
Return on equity 13.4% 10.4% 7.6%
Return on assets 6.2% 4.9% 4.5%
Return on invested capital 7.9% 6.2% 5.7%
Return on capital employed 8.3% 8.0% 6.4%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.4x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 1.8x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 1.5% 1.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTMOABTDHR
Debt / assets 37.6% 29.9% 28.8%
Debt / equity 0.8x 0.6x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.5x 2.5x 2.9x
Debt / FCF 5.8x 4.2x 4.9x
Liabilities / assets 53.4% 52.6% 43.1%
Equity / assets 46.6% 47.4% 56.9%
Interest coverage 5.6x 9.6x 17.6x
Current ratio 1.6x 1.4x 1.7x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.8x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.3x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 3.98 3.23 3.70

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTMOABTDHR
Dividend yield 0.3% 2.4% 0.7%
Net buyback yield 2.0% 0.9% 1.8%
Shareholder yield 2.3% 3.3% 2.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) 9.5% 78.5% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 9.0% 54.5% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 8.5% 7.2% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 10.8% 7.5% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTMOABTDHR
Forward P/E 26.1xFY2026 18.2xFY2026 25.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $25.77FY2026 $5.69FY2026 $9.03FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +12.7%FY2026 +10.5%FY2026 +15.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +1.8% +12.8% +8.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $49.99BFY2026 $53.32BFY2026 $27.12BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +12.2%FY2026 +20.3%FY2026 +10.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -2.9% -1.0% -1.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTMOABTDHR
Held by institutions 90.2% 79.2% 81.9%
Institutions holding 2,621 2,977 2,115
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.8% +0.3% +1.1%
Institutions buying 1,141 1,258 837
Institutions selling 1,144 1,376 1,015
Buyers to sellers 1.00 0.91 0.82

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TMOABTDHR
TMO 1.00 0.26 0.72
ABT 0.26 1.00 0.38
DHR 0.72 0.38 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TMO, ABT and DHR?

Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) $254.18B, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) $182.26B, Danaher (DHR) $164.19B.

Which stock is cheaper, TMO, ABT and DHR?

Abbott Laboratories (ABT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 36.5x, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 33.6x, Danaher (DHR) 41.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is cheapest (Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 26.1x, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 18.2x, Danaher (DHR) 25.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Abbott Laboratories (ABT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) +7.2%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) +8.1%, Danaher (DHR) +4.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Danaher (DHR) has the highest net margin (Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 15.0%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 11.6%, Danaher (DHR) 15.9%). On return on invested capital, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) leads (Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 7.9%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 6.2%, Danaher (DHR) 5.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) returned the most: Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) +17.8%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) -17.9%, Danaher (DHR) +3.5%. Over five years, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) compounded fastest (Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) +1.9%/yr, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) -3.9%/yr, Danaher (DHR) -6.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Abbott Laboratories (ABT) has the highest dividend yield: Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 0.00%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 0.02%, Danaher (DHR) 0.00%. Danaher (DHR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) has been the steadiest (Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 29.8%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 27.4%, Danaher (DHR) 30.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TMO, ABT and DHR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.