TIMB vs CHT vs RCI Stock Comparison

Tim, Chunghwa Telecom and Rogers Communications Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
TIMB Tim S.A.
$17.80 -2.0% 1M -23.7% 1Y
Market cap
$8.52B
P/E
10.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.32B
Div. yield
6.85%
Wireless Carriers Communication Services
7 wins
CHT Chunghwa Telecom Co Ltd
$48.52 +5.2% 1M +13.0% 1Y
Market cap
$37.64B
P/E
28.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.90B
Div. yield
3.32%
Wireless Carriers Communication Services
4 wins
RCI Rogers Communications Inc
$31.78 -0.5% 1M -20.0% 1Y
Market cap
$17.16B
P/E
25.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.37B
Div. yield
6.29%
Wireless Carriers Communication Services
1 win

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Tim leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Tim 7, Chunghwa Telecom 4, Rogers Communications 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTIMBCHTRCILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $8.52B $37.64B $17.16B CHT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 10.4x 28.1x 25.6x TIMB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 10.6x 28.4x 9.2x RCI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +12.2% +8.3% +8.8% TIMB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 15.5% 17.0% 4.1% CHT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 26.5% 10.7% 9.6% TIMB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.2x — 2.7x TIMB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 6.85% 3.32% 6.29% TIMB
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -23.7% +13.0% -20.0% CHT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +12.3%/yr +4.2%/yr -7.5%/yr TIMB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 36.8% 13.9% 29.1% CHT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 84/100 53/100 60/100 TIMB

Percentile Scorecard

TIMBCHTRCI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTIMBCHTRCI
Valuation 83 #9 of 49 25 #37 of 49 85 #8 of 49
Growth 66 #16 of 45 50 #23 of 45 46 #25 of 45
Profitability 98 #2 of 45 55 #21 of 45 71 #14 of 45
Financial Health 88 #7 of 49 94 #4 of 49 38 #31 of 49
Shareholder Returns 83 #7 of 37 42 #22 of 37 61 #15 of 37
Overall 84 53 60
  • TIMB ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications
  • CHT ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications
  • RCI ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTIMBCHTRCISPY
1 month -2.0%+5.2%-0.5% -0.2%
3 months -9.9%+12.1%-8.5% +3.9%
6 months -30.0%+11.4%-11.9% +8.2%
Year to date -8.5%+16.3%-15.8% +12.9%
1 year -23.7%+13.0%-20.0% +12.3%
3 years +18.7%+36.7%-13.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year +5.9%+11.0%-4.7% +23.3%
5 years +78.5%+22.6%-32.4% +67.9%
5 years, per year +12.3%+4.2%-7.5% +10.9%
10 years +29.2%+41.9%-20.5% +261.1%
10 years, per year +2.6%+3.6%-2.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureTIMBCHTRCISPY
Volatility, 1Y 36.8%13.9%29.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 41.4%14.8%27.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.450.100.15 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.640.93-0.69 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -40.0%-26.5%-61.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -36.3%-0.4%-22.4% -1.2%
52-week high $27.96$48.73$40.97 $779.14
52-week low $16.78$40.74$29.79 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTIMBCHTRCI
P/E now vs peer median 10.4xmedian 11.8x 28.1xmedian 11.8x 25.6xmedian 11.8x
P/S now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 1.1x 4.8xmedian 1.1x 1.0xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 2.9xmedian 6.8x —median 6.8x 4.3xmedian 6.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 3.2xmedian 5.9x 60.2xmedian 5.9x 2.6xmedian 5.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 1.2x 3.3xmedian 1.2x 1.5xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.96median 0.24 2.09median 0.24 -4.17median 0.24

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTIMBCHTRCI
Revenue $5.32B $7.90B $16.37B
Gross profit $2.91B $2.88B $7.23B
Operating income $1.34B $1.61B $6.95B
Net income $825.44M $1.34B $733.46M
Free cash flow $2.65B $625.04M $6.69B
R&D – $144.76M –
EPS (diluted) $1.71 $1.72 $1.24
Cash & equivalents $516.69M $1.32B $2.22B
Total debt $297.23M $620.49M $120.01B
Shares (diluted) 482.86M 777.60M 541.00M
Enterprise value $4.23B $30.13B $16.11B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTIMBCHTRCI
P/E 10.4x 28.1x 25.6x
P/FCF 3.2x 60.2x 2.6x
P/Operating cash flow 3.2x – 3.8x
P/S 1.6x 4.8x 1.0x
P/B 1.8x 3.3x 1.5x
P/Tangible book 4.6x 3.3x -1.9x
EV/EBITDA 2.9x – 4.3x
EV/EBIT 5.9x 22.0x 6.5x
EV/Revenue 1.5x 4.5x 2.8x
EV/FCF 3.0x 56.4x 6.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 3.0x – 10.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.96 2.09 -4.17

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTIMBCHTRCI
Revenue growth (1Y) 12.2% 8.3% 8.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -10.9% 3.2% 6.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 15.3% 7.9% 4.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -8.4% 2.8% 7.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 33.0% 6.9% 5.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 21.6% 1.1% 7.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 18.6% 8.2% -85.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 10.7% -0.8% -1.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 18.8% 52.6% -86.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 10.8% 13.5% -6.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 3.8% – 14.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 3.9% – 7.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 48.0% -11.2% 0.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -6.6% 2.4% 1.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTIMBCHTRCI
Gross margin 54.7% 36.5% 44.2%
EBITDA margin 50.7% – 63.8%
Operating margin 25.2% 20.3% 42.4%
Pretax margin 18.2% 21.0% 7.8%
Net margin 15.5% 17.0% 4.1%
FCF margin 49.8% 7.9% 40.9%
Operating cash flow margin 49.8% – 27.8%
Return on equity 17.4% 11.3% 6.3%
Return on assets 7.5% 1.9% 1.1%
Return on invested capital 26.5% 10.7% 9.6%
Return on capital employed – 2.4% 13.3%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.1x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.2x – 6.2x
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTIMBCHTRCI
Debt / assets 2.7% 1.1% 46.7%
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.0x 2.6x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.2x – 2.7x
Debt / FCF 0.1x 0.3x 4.5x
Liabilities / assets 56.3% 34.0% 82.1%
Equity / assets 43.7% 66.0% 17.9%
Interest coverage 2.2x 144.6x 4.4x
Current ratio – 1.2x 0.7x
Quick ratio – 1.0x 0.5x
Cash ratio – 0.7x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – 6.04 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTIMBCHTRCI
Dividend yield 6.9% 3.3% 6.3%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 6.9% 3.3% 6.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTIMBCHTRCI
Forward P/E 10.6xFY2026 28.4xFY2026 9.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.68FY2026 $1.71FY2026 $3.46FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -2.9%FY2026 +8.2%FY2026 -5.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +28.6% +3.5% 0.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.74BFY2026 $7.63BFY2026 $15.02BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +11.8%FY2026 +2.1%FY2026 -5.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.7% +12.1% +1.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTIMBCHTRCI
Held by institutions 4.4% 2.6% –
Institutions holding 169 218 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -4.0% +1.3% –
Institutions buying 88 136 –
Institutions selling 56 47 –
Buyers to sellers 1.57 2.89 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TIMBCHTRCI
TIMB 1.00 0.19 0.04
CHT 0.19 1.00 0.24
RCI 0.04 0.24 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TIMB, CHT and RCI?

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Tim (TIMB) $8.52B, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) $37.64B, Rogers Communications (RCI) $17.16B.

Which stock is cheaper, TIMB, CHT and RCI?

Tim (TIMB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Tim (TIMB) 10.4x, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 28.1x, Rogers Communications (RCI) 25.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Rogers Communications (RCI) is cheapest (Tim (TIMB) 10.6x, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 28.4x, Rogers Communications (RCI) 9.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Tim (TIMB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Tim (TIMB) +12.2%, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) +8.3%, Rogers Communications (RCI) +8.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) has the highest net margin (Tim (TIMB) 15.5%, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 17.0%, Rogers Communications (RCI) 4.1%). On return on invested capital, Tim (TIMB) leads (Tim (TIMB) 26.5%, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 10.7%, Rogers Communications (RCI) 9.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) returned the most: Tim (TIMB) -23.7%, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) +13.0%, Rogers Communications (RCI) -20.0%. Over five years, Tim (TIMB) compounded fastest (Tim (TIMB) +12.3%/yr, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) +4.2%/yr, Rogers Communications (RCI) -7.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Tim (TIMB) has the highest dividend yield: Tim (TIMB) 6.85%, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 3.32%, Rogers Communications (RCI) 6.29%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) has been the steadiest (Tim (TIMB) 36.8%, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 13.9%, Rogers Communications (RCI) 29.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TIMB, CHT and RCI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Tim (TIMB) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.