TGT vs SVV vs MNSO Stock Comparison

Target, Savers Value Village and MINISO Group Holding Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
TGT Target Corp
$152.74 -2.3% 1M +62.1% 1Y
Market cap
$67.49B
P/E
15.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$107.71B
Div. yield
0.03%
Broadline Retail Consumer Discretionary
4 wins
MNSO MINISO Group Holding Ltd
$10.04 +11.8% 1M -54.3% 1Y
Market cap
$3.06B
P/E
17.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.38B
Div. yield
–
Broadline Retail Consumer Discretionary
7 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

MINISO Group Holding leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (MINISO Group Holding 7, Target 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTGTSVVMNSOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $67.49B $1.37B $3.06B TGT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 15.4x 55.2x 17.0x TGT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.7x 19.1x 9.7x MNSO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +2.0% +10.0% +30.5% MNSO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.1% 1.4% 5.3% MNSO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 14.4% 7.0% 20.1% MNSO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.1x 2.8x -0.3x MNSO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.03% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +62.1% -28.9% -54.3% TGT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -9.8%/yr — -9.2%/yr MNSO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 30.6% 60.4% 37.5% TGT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 45/100 71/100 MNSO

Percentile Scorecard

TGTSVVMNSO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTGTSVVMNSO
Valuation 60 #42 of 104 46 #57 of 104 66 #36 of 104
Growth 61 #39 of 99 52 #48 of 99 67 #33 of 99
Profitability 74 #27 of 99 61 #39 of 99 83 #18 of 99
Financial Health 45 #63 of 113 23 #87 of 113 63 #42 of 113
Shareholder Returns 32 #50 of 73 44 #41 of 73 75 #19 of 73
Overall 54 45 71
  • TGT ranked among 115 companies in Retail
  • SVV ranked among 115 companies in Retail
  • MNSO ranked among 115 companies in Retail

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTGTSVVMNSOSPY
1 month -2.3%+3.9%+11.8% -1.0%
3 months +11.7%+2.9%-17.8% +2.9%
6 months +18.2%+7.6%-33.4% +6.4%
Year to date +56.3%+0.4%-46.5% +11.4%
1 year +62.1%-28.9%-54.3% +13.1%
3 years +40.5%-36.0%-64.3% +79.4%
3 years, per year +12.0%-13.8%-29.1% +21.5%
5 years -40.3%—-38.2% +67.7%
5 years, per year -9.8%—-9.2% +10.9%
10 years +123.9%—— +255.2%
10 years, per year +8.4%—— +13.5%

Risk

MeasureTGTSVVMNSOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 30.6%60.4%37.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 29.3%70.5%40.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.301.220.83 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.03-0.48-1.45 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -68.6%-74.7%-73.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -10.1%-31.2%-54.8% -2.5%
52-week high $169.90$13.63$22.19 $779.14
52-week low $83.68$7.10$8.60 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTGTSVVMNSO
P/E now vs peer median 15.8xmedian 16.7x 58.2xmedian 16.7x 17.1xmedian 16.7x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 0.5x 0.8xmedian 0.5x 0.9xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.6xmedian 9.1x 9.1xmedian 9.1x 6.5xmedian 9.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 15.6xmedian 16.6x 17.6xmedian 16.6x —median 16.6x
P/B now vs peer median 3.9xmedian 1.7x 3.2xmedian 1.7x 2.0xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 1.63median 0.73 -1.93median 0.73 -1.69median 0.73

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTGTSVVMNSO
Revenue $107.71B $1.74B $3.38B
Gross profit $31.56B $971.07M $1.52B
Operating income $6.02B $134.38M $486.18M
Net income $4.39B $24.81M $179.70M
Free cash flow $4.46B $81.81M –
EPS (diluted) $9.62 $0.16 $0.58
Cash & equivalents – $91.87M $1.04B
Total debt $63.73B $713.99M $3.53B
Shares (diluted) 456.60M 159.10M 308.38M
Enterprise value $62.08B $1.07B -$445.15M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTGTSVVMNSO
P/E 15.8x 58.2x 17.1x
P/FCF 15.6x 17.6x –
P/Operating cash flow 8.0x 7.0x –
P/S 0.6x 0.8x 0.9x
P/B 3.9x 3.2x 2.0x
P/Tangible book 3.9x 4.9x 2.1x
EV/EBITDA 8.6x 9.1x 6.5x
EV/EBIT 13.2x 15.4x 6.1x
EV/Revenue 0.7x 1.2x 0.9x
EV/FCF 17.8x 25.2x –
EV/Operating cash flow 9.1x 10.1x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.63 -1.93 -1.69

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTGTSVVMNSO
Revenue growth (1Y) 2.0% 10.0% 30.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.1% 5.8% 27.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 7.3% 10.4% 30.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 3.9% 4.1% 34.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 11.0% 6.5% 3.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 8.6% -11.9% 15.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 11.8% -27.0% -45.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 9.2% -28.1% -10.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 11.6% -25.5% -44.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 9.7% -30.1% -10.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 36.6% 52.4% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.3% 5.9% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 51.4% 183.7% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 39.7% 3.8% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTGTSVVMNSO
Gross margin 29.3% 55.7% 44.9%
EBITDA margin 8.5% 13.0% 13.4%
Operating margin 5.6% 7.7% 14.4%
Pretax margin 5.3% 2.4% 14.1%
Net margin 4.1% 1.4% 5.3%
FCF margin 4.1% 4.7% –
Operating cash flow margin 8.1% 11.8% –
Return on equity 25.8% 5.7% 11.5%
Return on assets 7.4% 1.2% 4.1%
Return on invested capital 14.4% 7.0% 20.1%
Return on capital employed 15.7% 7.4% 16.0%
Asset turnover 1.8x 0.9x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.0x 8.3x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.3% 1.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTGTSVVMNSO
Debt / assets 25.1% 34.4% 20.7%
Debt / equity 0.9x 1.6x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.1x 2.8x -0.3x
Debt / FCF 3.4x 8.7x –
Liabilities / assets 70.9% 78.6% 65.7%
Equity / assets 29.1% 21.4% 34.3%
Interest coverage 14.0x – 7.0x
Current ratio 1.0x 0.8x 1.6x
Quick ratio 0.3x 0.5x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.4x 0.8x
Altman Z-score 3.29 1.37 2.26

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTGTSVVMNSO
Dividend yield 3.0% – 3.8%
Net buyback yield 0.2% 1.9% –
Shareholder yield 3.2% 1.9% 3.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) 47.1% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 46.4% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 1.0% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 1.3% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTGTSVVMNSO
Forward P/E 14.7xFY2026 19.1xFY2026 9.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $10.42FY2026 $0.49FY2026 $1.03FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +37.6%FY2026 +8.9%FY2026 +83.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -13.2% +18.4% +18.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $112.64BFY2026 $1.71BFY2026 $3.46BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +7.5%FY2026 +1.8%FY2026 +12.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +7.7% +15.0% +14.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTGTSVVMNSO
Held by institutions 86.5% 100.0% 4.5%
Institutions holding 1,882 149 101
Change in shares held, QoQ +20.5% -0.6% -2.8%
Institutions buying 929 91 68
Institutions selling 670 36 23
Buyers to sellers 1.39 2.53 2.96

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TGTSVVMNSO
TGT 1.00 0.33 0.19
SVV 0.33 1.00 0.21
MNSO 0.19 0.21 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TGT, SVV and MNSO?

Target (TGT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Target (TGT) $67.49B, Savers Value Village (SVV) $1.37B, MINISO Group Holding (MNSO) $3.06B.

Which stock is cheaper, TGT, SVV and MNSO?

Target (TGT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Target (TGT) 15.4x, Savers Value Village (SVV) 55.2x, MINISO Group Holding (MNSO) 17.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, MINISO Group Holding (MNSO) is cheapest (Target (TGT) 14.7x, Savers Value Village (SVV) 19.1x, MINISO Group Holding (MNSO) 9.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

MINISO Group Holding (MNSO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Target (TGT) +2.0%, Savers Value Village (SVV) +10.0%, MINISO Group Holding (MNSO) +30.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

MINISO Group Holding (MNSO) has the highest net margin (Target (TGT) 4.1%, Savers Value Village (SVV) 1.4%, MINISO Group Holding (MNSO) 5.3%). On return on invested capital, MINISO Group Holding (MNSO) leads (Target (TGT) 14.4%, Savers Value Village (SVV) 7.0%, MINISO Group Holding (MNSO) 20.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Target (TGT) returned the most: Target (TGT) +62.1%, Savers Value Village (SVV) -28.9%, MINISO Group Holding (MNSO) -54.3%. Over five years, MINISO Group Holding (MNSO) compounded fastest (Target (TGT) -9.8%/yr, MINISO Group Holding (MNSO) -9.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Target (TGT) 0.03%, Savers Value Village (SVV) 0.00%, MINISO Group Holding (MNSO) 0.00%. Savers Value Village (SVV) and MINISO Group Holding (MNSO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Target (TGT) has been the steadiest (Target (TGT) 30.6%, Savers Value Village (SVV) 60.4%, MINISO Group Holding (MNSO) 37.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TGT, SVV and MNSO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, MINISO Group Holding (MNSO) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.